Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 56–59 | Cite as

Estimation and Prediction of the Population Irradiation Dose in the Vicinity of NPP with VVER-1200

  • R. A. MikailovaEmail author
  • V. E. Nushtaeva
  • S. I. Spiridonov
  • E. I. Karpenko
  • V. V. Krechetnikov
Article
  • 3 Downloads

The dose loads from the natural and technogenic background to the population living in the vicinity of NPP with VVER-1200 in Kaliningrad Oblast were estimated on the basis of radioecological inspection data. The average yearly effective population irradiation dose from natural and technogenic radionuclides present in the environment is equal to 2.42 mSv. The population radiation impact from atmospheric emissions is predicted. The maximum dose load is ~1 μSv/yr and does not exceed the quota for radioactive emissions from NPP 10 μmSv/yr.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. K. Kuznetsov, E. I. Karpenko, N. N. Isamov, et al., “Results of radioecological monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems in the construction zone of the Baltic NPP,” in: Trudy FGBNU VNIIRAE, Iss. 1, Topical Problems of Radioecology, FGBNU VNIIRAE, Obninsk (2018), pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MR 2.6.1.0063-06, Monitoring of Population Irradiation Doses in the Observation Zone of a Radiation Facility during Normal Operation and Radiation Accidents. Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, Moscow (2013).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment, Saf. Rep. Ser. No. 19, IAEA, Vienna (2001).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Simmonds, G. Lawson, and A. Mayall, “Methodology for assessing the radiological consequences of routine releases of radionuclides to the environment,” Radiation Protection 72, Brussels–Luxembourg (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. I. Kryshev and E. P. Ryazantsev, Ecological Safety of the Russian Nuclear Power System, IzdAT, Moscow (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. I. Spiridonov, R. M. Aleksakhin, and E. V. Spirin, “Integrated indicators of the impact of radiation exposure from open and closed fuel cycle facilities on the population,” At. Energ., 118, No. 1, 47–54 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. I, Sources, Vol. II, Effects, UNSCEAR 2008 Rep., United Nations, New York (2011).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Ojovan, W. Lee, and S. N. Kalmykov, An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2019), 3rd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SanPiN 2.6.1.2523–09 NRB-99/2009, Radiation Safety Standards, Rospotrebnadzor, Moscow (2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    SanPin 2.6.1.24-03, Sanitary Regulations for the Design and Operation of Nuclear Plants (SP AS-03), NTTs YaRB, Moscow (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Mikailova
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. E. Nushtaeva
    • 1
  • S. I. Spiridonov
    • 1
  • E. I. Karpenko
    • 1
  • V. V. Krechetnikov
    • 1
  1. 1.All-Russia Research Institute of Radiology and Agroecology (VNIIRAE)ObninskRussia

Personalised recommendations