Advertisement

Prediction of ionospheric vertical total electron content from GPS data using ordinary kriging-based surrogate model

  • R. MukeshEmail author
  • P. Soma
  • V. Karthikeyan
  • P. Sindhu
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The total electron content (TEC) is the number of electrons present in a ray path between satellite and receiver. TEC affects the propagation of radio signal from satellite to receiver, which causes a ranging error. In the case of single frequency user receiver, the prediction of TEC helps to correct the range errors. TEC is measured using TEC unit (TECU), where \(1~\text{TECU} = 1 \times 10^{16}~\text{electrons}/\text{m}^{2}\). The vertical total electron content (VTEC) of the L1 band is estimated by using data collected from GPS receiver which is installed at the ACSCE station Bangalore. In this work, an ordinary kriging (OK)-based surrogate model algorithm and Matlab code is developed and used to predict the hourly basis ionospheric VTEC. Six parameters such as time, sun spot number (SSN), the solar flux index at 10.7 cm (F10.7), Kp and Ap and observed TEC are used to build the surrogate model. These parameters are related to the ionospheric diurnal variations, solar cycle and geomagnetic activities. In order to cover all regions of the world during different solar activity periods six input parameters are collected from low-, mid- and high-latitude regions during low, medium and high solar activity periods. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the OK-based surrogate model ranges from 0.6–3.6 TECU, and the correlation coefficient varies between 0.79–0.99 and range error varies from 0.04654–0.3017244 m at three regions.

The TEC prediction results from the OK-based surrogate model are compared with results obtained from (i) a genetic algorithm-based neural network (GA-NN), (ii) a back-propagation neural network (BP-NN) and (iii) the IRI-2012 model at the CHAN station. For a typical dataset the RMSE of the OK-based surrogate model is 4.523 TECU and the correlation coefficient is 0.9733. The RMSE values for the GA-NN, BP-NN and IRI-2012 models are 5.3529, 6.2913 and 6.7179 TECU and The correlation coefficients are 0.8343, 0.7869 and 0.7797, respectively. The OK model is also compared with a time series method for the CHAN station; it is observed that, for 3 days (7-1-2008 to 9-1-2008) prediction, the OK model gives a 75% result for \(\Delta \textit{TEC} <1~\text{TECU}\) condition, the time series method gives 39% for the same condition. The results indicate that the OK-based surrogate model is suitable for applications in ionospheric TEC predictions.

Keywords

Ionosphere Vertical total electron content Ordinary kriging Surrogate model GPS TEC prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research work presented in this paper has been carried out under the project entitled “Surrogate model for ionospheric studies using IRNSS/GPS Data”, funded by SAC, ISRO, Ahmadabad.

References

  1. Acharya, R., Roy, B., Sivaraman, M.R., Dasgupta, A.: Prediction of ionospheric total electron content using adaptive neural network with in-situ learning algorithm. Adv. Space Res. 47, 115–123 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arikan, F., Erol, C.B., Arikan, O.: Regularized estimation of vertical total electron content from GPS data for a desired time period. IEEE (2004) Google Scholar
  3. Arikan, F., Erol, C.B., Arikan, O.: Regularized estimation of TEC from GPS data for certain mid latitude stations and comparisons with IRI model. Adv. Space Res. 39(5), 867–874 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badeke, R., Borries, C., Hoque, M.M., Minkwitz, D.: Empirical forecast of quiet time ionospheric Total Electron Content maps over Europe. Adv. Space Res. 61(12), 2881–2890 (2018) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balu, R., Ulaganathan, S., Asproulis, N.: Effect of variogram types on surrogate model based optimisation of aircraft wing shapes. Proc. Eng. 38, 2713–2725 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilitza, D., McKinnell, L.-A., Reinisch, B., Fuller-Rowell, T.: The international reference ionosphere today and in the future. J. Geod. 85, 909–920 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Homam, M.J.: Prediction of total electron content of the ionosphere using neural network. UTM J. Technol. 78(5–8), 53–57 (2016) Google Scholar
  8. Kenpankho, P., Watthanasangmechai, K., Supnithi, P., Tsugawa, T., Maruyama, T.: Comparison of GPS TEC measurements with IRI TEC prediction at the equatorial latitude station, Chumphon, Thailand. Earth Planets Space 63, 365–370 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krishnan, S.R., Seelamantula, C.S.: On the selection of optimum Savitzky-Golay filters. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61(2), 380–391 (2013) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanyi, G.E., Roth, T.: A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and beacon satellite observations. Radio Sci. 23, 483–492 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, X., Guo, D.: Modeling and prediction of ionospheric total electron content by time series analysis. In: 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Control. IEEE Press, New York (2010) Google Scholar
  12. Montagnac, M., Jouhaud, J.C., Sagaut, P., Laurenceau, J.: A surrogate-model based multidisciplinary shape optimization method with application to a 2d subsonic airfoil. Comput. Fluids 36, 520–529 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukesh, R., Lingadurai, K., Selvakumar, U.: Kriging methodology for surrogate-based airfoil shape optimization. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(10), 7363–7373 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murayama, M., Jeong, S., Yamamoto, K.: Efficient optimization design method using kriging model. J. Aircr. 42, 413–420 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nayirl, H., Arikan, F., Arikan, O., Erol, C.B.: GPS/TEC estimation with IONOLAB method. 1-4244-1057-6/07, IEEE (2007) Google Scholar
  16. Norsuzila, Y., Abdullah, M., Ismail, M., Ibrahim, M., Zakaria, Z.: Total electron content (TEC) and estimation of positioning error using Malaysia data. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. I, WCE 2010 (2010) Google Scholar
  17. Panda, S.K., Gedam, S.S., Shuanggen, J.: Ionospheric TEC Variations at Low Latitude Indian Region. IntechOpen, China (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poole, A.W.V., McKinnell, L.-A.: On the predictability of foF2 using neural networks. Radio Sci. 35, 225–234 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Radzol, A.R.M., Lee, K.Y., Mansor, W., Azman, A.: Optimization of Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter for salivary surface enhanced Raman spectra of non structural protein 1. IEEE (2014) Google Scholar
  20. Sharma, K., Dabas, R.S., Ravindran, S.: Study of total electron content variations over equatorial and low latitude ionosphere during extreme solar minimum. Astrophys. Space Sci. 341(2), 277–286 (2012) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shyy, Wei, Tushar, G., Vaidyanathan, R., Queipo, N.V., Haftka, R.T., Tucker, P.K.: Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41, 1–28 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Song, R., Zhang, X., Zhou, C., Liu, J., He, J.: Predicting TEC in China based on the neural networks optimized by genetic algorithm. Adv. Space Res. 62, 745–759 (2018) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Srilatha Indira Dutt, V.B.S., Gowsuddin, S.: Ionospheric delay estimation using Klobuchar algorithm for single frequency GPS receivers. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electron. Commun. Eng. 2, 202–207 (2013) Google Scholar
  24. Sun, S., Egerstedt, M.B., Martin, C.F.: Control theoretic smoothing splines. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(12), 2271–2279 (2000) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu, W.-C., Wang, T.-H., Chiu, C.-T.: Edge curve scaling and smoothing with cubic spline interpolation for image up scaling. In: IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2013) Google Scholar
  26. Ya’acob, N., Abdullah, M., Ismail, M.: GPS total electron content (TEC) prediction at ionosphere layer over the equatorial region. In: Bouras, C.J. (ed.) Trends in Telecommunications Technologies. IntechOpen, Europe (2010) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringACS College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Aeronautical EngineeringACS College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of ECEDr. MGR Educational and Research InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations