Advertisement

Development of a Dualistic Model of Sexual Passion: Investigating Determinants and Consequences

  • Frederick L. PhilippeEmail author
  • Robert J. Vallerand
  • Geneviève Beaulieu-Pelletier
  • Gabrielle Maliha
  • Samuel Laventure
  • Jean-Sébastien Ricard-St-Aubin
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In empirical research, sexual passion has frequently been conceptualized as the interdependent dynamics experienced with a partner and as following a unidimensional continuum of intensity. A recent theoretical model conceptualized sexual passion as an intrapersonal motivation, which can energize both partnered and non-partnered sexual behaviors (Philippe, Vallerand, Bernard-Desrosiers, Guilbault, & Rajotte, 2017). This model also departs from the typical unidimensional continuum by positing the existence of two types of sexual passion: harmonious sexual passion (HSP) and obsessive sexual passion (OSP). The purpose of the present research was to extend the development of such a dualistic model by examining key theoretical determinants and consequences of each type of sexual passion. Study 1 provided empirical evidence of discriminant validity for such a model with respect to key-related constructs in the sex literature (e.g., sexual desire, hypersexuality, self-determined motives). The results of Study 2 showed that both types of sexual passion were associated with a high engagement in various sexual activities, but that only HSP combined it with couple adjustment. Finally, Study 3 indicated that both HSP and OSP were associated with common as well as distinct determinants, while being conducive to different personal and interpersonal consequences. Overall, there were very few moderations by biological sex. The results of these three studies provide empirical support for the sexual passion model and pave the way for new research directions.

Keywords

Sexual passion Dualistic model Sexual desire Sexuality Relationship 

Notes

References

  1. Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu-Pelletier, G., Philippe, F. L., Lecours, S., & Couture, S. (2011). The role of attachment avoidance in extradyadic sex. Attachment & Human Development, 13, 293–313.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2011.562419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bélanger, J. J., Lafreniere, M.-A. K., Vallerand, R. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). When passion makes the heart grow colder: The role of passion in alternative goal suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 126–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotto, L. A., & Smith, K. B. (2013). Sexual desire and pleasure. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 205–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-008.Google Scholar
  7. Brunell, A. B., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Self-determination and sexual experience in dating relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 970–987.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213485442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193–221.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1158–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982411003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederick, D., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2012). Sexual arousal and desire: Interrelations and responses to three modalities of sexual stimuli. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 2315–2329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02845.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldhammer, D. L., & McCabe, M. P. (2011). A qualitative exploration of the meaning and experience of sexual desire among partnered women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 19–29.Google Scholar
  19. Hatfield, E., & Walster, G. W. (1978). A new look at love. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Hook, J. N., Hook, J. P., Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Penberthy, J. K. (2010). Measuring sexual addiction and compulsivity: A critical review of instruments. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 227–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926231003719673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins, S. S. (2003). Gender and self-determination in sexual motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 6330.Google Scholar
  22. Kafka, M. P. (2010). Hypersexual disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 377–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9574-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kafka, M. P., & Hennen, J. (2003). Hypersexual desire in males: Are males with paraphilias different from males with paraphilia-related disorders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 307–321.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320301500407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales: Reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586–601.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  26. Levine, S. B. (2002). Reexploring the concept of sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262302317251007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pelletier, L., Dion, S., Slovinec-D’Angelo, M., & Reid, R. (2004). Why do you regulate what you eat? Relationships between forms of regulation, eating behaviors, sustained dietary behavior change, and psychological adjustment. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 245–277.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040154.40922.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelletier, L. G., Sharp, E., Huta, V., & Beaudry, S. (2016). The global motivation scale: Its validity and usefulness in predicting success and failure at self-regulation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
  31. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Bernard-Desrosiers, L., Guilbault, V., & Rajotte, G. (2017). Understanding the cognitive and motivational underpinnings of sexual passion from a dualistic model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 769–785.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinney, E. M., Gerrard, M., & Denney, N. W. (1987). The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 233–251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498709551359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid, R., Carpenter, B., Spackman, M., & Willes, D. (2008). Alexithymia, emotional instability, and vulnerability to stress proneness in patients seeking help for hypersexual behavior. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 133–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230701636197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997). The International Index Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  37. Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 141–177.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheldon, K. M., Osin, E. N., Gordeeva, T. O., Suchkov, D. D., & Sychev, O. A. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1215–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217711915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 38, 15–28.  https://doi.org/10.2307/350547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239608414655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stice, E. (2001). A prospective test of the dual-pathway model of bulimic pathology: Mediating effects of dieting and negative affect. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 124–135.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stice, E., & Bearman, S. K. (2001). Body-image and eating disturbances prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms in adolescent girls: A growth curve analysis. Developmental Psychology, 37, 597–619.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Štulhofer, A., Jurin, T., & Briken, P. (2016). Is high sexual desire a facet of male hypersexuality? Results from an online study. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 42, 665–680.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1113585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168–193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Leonard, M., … Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l’ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756–767.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Sexual passion, intimacy, and gender. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 189–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Weinstein, N., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Motivational determinants of integrating positive and negative past identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 527–544.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations