To What Extent Do Erotic Images Elicit Visuospatial versus Cognitive Attentional Processes? Consistent Support for a (Non-Spatial) Sexual Content-Induced Delay
It is almost a cultural truism that erotic images attract our attention, presumably because paying attention to erotic stimuli provided our ancestors with mating benefits. Attention, however, can be narrowly defined as visuospatial attention (keeping such stimuli in view) or more broadly as cognitive attention (such stimuli taking up one’s thoughts). We present four independent studies aiming to test the extent to which erotic images have priority in capturing visuospatial versus cognitive attention. Whereas the former would show in quicker reactions to stimuli presented in locations where erotic images appeared previously, the latter causes delayed responding after erotic images, independent of their location). To this end, we specifically modified spatial cueing tasks to disentangle visuospatial attention capture from general sexual content-induced delay (SCID) effects—a major drawback in the previous literature. Consistently across all studies (total N = 399), we found no evidence in support of visuospatial attention capture but reliably observed an unspecific delay of responding for trials in which erotic images appeared (irrespective of cue location). This SCID is equally large for heterosexual men and women and reliably associated with their self-reported sexual excitability.
KeywordsErotic cognition Visual attention Spatial cueing Sexual content-induced delay Sexual excitability
The reported research and preparation of this paper were supported by a DFG Grant (IM147/3-1) awarded to Roland Imhoff. All experimental scripts, raw and aggregated data as well as results of additional analyses can be found on the Open Science Framework under https://osf.io/6uqyv.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brauer, M., van Leeuwen, M., Janssen, E., Newhouse, S. K., Heiman, J. R., & Laan, E. (2012). Attentional and affective processing of sexual stimuli in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9820-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93, 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conaglen, H. M. (2004). Sexual content induced delay: A reexamination investigating relation to sexual desire. Archives of Sexual Behavior,33, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028889.63425.fb.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fox, E., Derakshan, N., & Standage, H. (2011). The assessment of human attention. In K. C. Klauer, A. Voss, & C. Stahl (Eds.), Cognitive methods in social psychology (pp. 15–47). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Fromberger, P., Jordan, K., Steinkrauss, H., Von Herder, J., Stolpmann, G., Kröner-Herwig, B., & Müller, J. L. (2013). Eye movements in pedophiles: Automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,122(2), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Imhoff, R., Lange, J., & Germar, M. (2019). Identification and location tasks rely on different mental processes: A diffusion model account of validity effects in spatial cueing paradigms with emotional stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 33, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1443433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9595-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Weiß, S., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2012). Vicarious viewing time: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task- or stimulus-specific processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9879-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, N. C. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior,28, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mechelsmann, D. J., Irvine, M., Banca, P., Porter, L., Mitchell, S., Mole, T. B., … Voon, V. (2014). Enhanced attentional bias towards sexually explicit cues in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviours. PLoS ONE,9, e105476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nemetschek, R. (2013). Das Dot-Probe-Paradigma zur Erfassung sexueller Präferenzen [The Dot Probe paradigm as a measure of sexual preferences]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
- Oberlader, V. A., Ettinger, U., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2017). Development of a cued pro- and antisaccade paradigm: An indirect measure to explore automatic components of sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 2377–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0839-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rönspies, J., Schmidt, A. F., Melnikova, A., Krumova, R., Zolfagari, A., & Banse, R. (2015). Indirect measurement of sexual orientation: Comparison of the implicit relational assessment procedure, viewing time, and choice reaction time tasks. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0473-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., & Imhoff, R. (2015). Indirect measures in forensic contexts. In T. M. Ortner & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Behavior-based assessment in psychology: Going beyond self-report in the personality, affective, motivation, and social domains (pp. 173–194). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Seehus, M. (2015). Discrepant attentional biases toward sexual stimuli. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
- Snowden, R. J., Curl, C., Jobbins, K., Lavington, C., & Gray, N. S. (2016). Automatic direction of spatial attention to male versus female stimuli: A comparison of heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0678-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2004). Conscious processing of sexual information: Mechanisms of appraisal. Archives of Sexual Behavior,33, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028890.08687.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welsch, R., Schmidt, A. F., Turner, D., & Rettenberger, M. (2019). Test-retest reliability and temporal agreement of direct and indirect sexual interest measures. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar