Advertisement

Fraternal Birth Order, Only-Child Status, and Sibling Sex Ratio Related to Sexual Orientation in the Add Health Data: A Re-analysis and Extended Findings

  • Malvina N. SkorskaEmail author
  • Anthony F. Bogaert
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The fraternal birth order (FBO) effect related to men’s sexual orientation refers to the finding that the number of older brothers that a man has increases his chance of being androphilic. The FBO effect has generally been well replicated in diverse samples; one instance of non-replication was by Francis (2008) using Waves I and III of the Add Health data. We attempted to replicate the FBO effect in the Add Health data taking into account family size and other limitations of Francis’ (2008) analyses. Also, we examined other sibling characteristics related to the FBO effect: sibling sex ratio and only-child status. We used two subsamples from Waves I (n = 20,745) and IV (n = 15,701) of the Add Health data, consisting of adolescents who were followed longitudinally from 1994 to 1995 until 2008. Wave I data were used to compute numbers of younger and older brothers and sisters from household roster information. Wave IV information about sexual orientation identity was used. Analyses were conducted within men and within women. We found modest support for the FBO effect in men, but not in women, using the older brother odds ratio, logistic regression analyses, and sibling sex ratio, which provided the strongest support for FBO. We found that gynephilic/biphilic women, but not androphilic/biphilic men, were more likely to be only-children compared to androphilic women and gynephilic men, respectively. We discuss limitations of the Add Health data and purported mechanisms for the FBO effect in men and the only-child effect in women.

Keywords

Sexual orientation Fraternal birth order Sibling sex ratio Only-child status Add Health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis. Data acquisition was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Grant to A. F. Bogaert [335-737-042]. Thank you to R. Blanchard for help with analyses.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study by the Add Health researchers. Ethics approval for secondary data analysis was received from the University Research Ethics Board.

References

  1. Apostolou, M. (2019). Does fraternal birth order predict male homosexuality, bisexuality, and heterosexual orientation with same-sex attraction? Evidence from a Greek-speaking sample from Greece. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01466-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. M., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,17, 45–101.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616637616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research,8, 27–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.1997.10559918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (2012a). A possible second type of maternal–fetal immune interaction involved in both male and female homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 1507–1511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9896-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R. (2012b). Fertility in the mothers of firstborn homosexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 551–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-01-9888-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R. (2014). Detecting and correcting for family size differences in the study of sexual orientation and fraternal birth order. Archives of Sexual Behavior,43, 845–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0245-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R. (2018a). Fraternal birth order, family size, and male homosexuality: Meta-analysis of studies spanning 25 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1007-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard, R. (2018b). Older brothers and older sisters odds ratios in 36 samples of homosexual males. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 829–832.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1160-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard, R. (2018c). Response to commentaries: Meta-analysis of probability samples and other new evidence. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1134-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996). Homosexuality in men and number of older brothers. American Journal of Psychiatry,153, 27–31.  https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.153.1.27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Proportion of homosexual men who owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order: An estimate based on two national probability samples. American Journal of Human Biology,16, 151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanchard, R., Zucker, K. J., Siegelman, M., Dickey, R., & Klassen, P. (1998). The relation of birth order to sexual orientation in men and women. Journal of Biosocial Science,30, 511–519.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932098005112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogaert, A. F. (1997). Birth order and sexual orientation in women. Behavioral Neuroscience,111, 1395–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.111.6.1395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bogaert, A. F. (2003). Number of older brothers and sexual orientation: New tests and the attraction/behavior distinction in two national probability samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84, 644–652.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bogaert, A. F. (2006). Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men’s sexual orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103, 10771–10774.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511152103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. N. (2011). Sexual orientation, fraternal birth order, and the maternal immune hypothesis: A review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology,32, 247–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bogaert, A. F., Skorska, M. N., Wang, C., Gabrie, J., MacNeil, A. J., Hoffarth, M. R., … Blanchard, R. (2018). Male homosexuality and maternal immune responsivity to the Y-linked protein NLGN4Y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 302–306.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705895114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breedlove, S. M. (2017). Prenatal influences on human sexual orientation: Expectations versus data. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 1583–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0904-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Paterson, A. D., & Bogaert, A. F. (2002). How many gay men owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order? Archives of Sexual Behavior,31, 63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014031201935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, P., & Chantala, K. (2014). Guidelines for analyzing Add Health data. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/wt-guidelines.pdf.
  21. Coome, L. A., Skorska, M. N., van der Miesen, A. I. R., Peregine, D. E., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2018). An examination of the biodevelopment of gender expression in children ages 6-to 12-years. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,27, 133–143.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2018-0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond, L. M., & Alley, J. (2019). Was it good for her? An alternative perspective on life history theory, female same-sex sexuality, and pleasure [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,48, 1315–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1313-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fish, J. N., & Russell, S. T. (2018). Have mischievous responders misidentified sexual minority youth disparities in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health? Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1053–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0993-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Francis, A. M. (2008). Family and sexual orientation: The family-demographic correlates of homosexuality in men and women. Journal of Sex Research,45, 371–377.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grimbos, T., Dawood, K., Burriss, R. P., Zucker, K. J., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: A meta-analysis in men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience,124, 278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018764.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, K. M. (2009). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007–2009 [Machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27021.v9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, K. M. (2013). The Add health study: Design and accomplishments. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/DesignPaperWIIV.pdf.
  29. Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., & Udry, J. R. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health: Research design. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
  30. James, W. H. (1987). The human sex ratio. Part 1: A review of the literature. Human Biology,59, 721–752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn, D. A., & Baltimore, D. (2010). Pregnancy induces a fetal antigen-specific maternal T regulatory cell response that contributes to tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107, 9299–9304.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003909107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz-Wise, S. L., Calzo, J. P., Li, G., & Pollitt, A. (2015). Same data, different perspectives: What is at stake? Response to Savin-Williams and Joyner (2014a) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0434-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly, J. B. (2007). Children’s living arrangements following separation and divorce: Insights from empirical and clinical research. Family Process,46, 35–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00190.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lavin, C. (1991). About 80 percent of Americans have at …. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-11-10-9104110272-story.html.
  35. Li, G., Katz-Wise, S. L., & Calzo, J. P. (2014). The unjustified doubt of Add Health studies on the health disparities of non-heterosexual adolescents: Comment on Savin-Williams and Joyner (2014) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,43, 1023–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0313-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, G., & Wong, W. I. (2018). Single-sex schooling: Friendships, dating, and sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1025–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowry, R. (2019a). The significance of the difference between two independent proportions. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://vassarstats.net/propdiff_ind.html.
  38. Lowry, R. (2019b). VassarStats: Website for statistical computation. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://vassarstats.net/index.html.
  39. Meyer, D. R., Cancian, M., & Cook, S. T. (2017). The growth in shared custody in the United States: Patterns and implications. Family Court Review,55, 500–512.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nielsen, H. S. (2011). Secondary recurrent miscarriage and H–Y immunity. Human Reproduction Update,17, 558–574.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jamain, S., Jamain, S, Quach, H, Betancur, C, Råstam, M, Colineaux, C, … Bourgeron, T. (2003). Mutations of the X-linked genes encoding neuroligins NLGN3 and NLGN4 are associated with autism. Nature Genetics, 34, 27–29.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Odds ratio calculator. (2019). Retrieved January 15, 2017, from https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php.
  43. Odds-ratioconfidence interval calculator. (2019). Retrieved January 15, 2017, from https://select-statistics.co.uk/calculators/confidence-interval-calculator-odds-ratio/.
  44. Olson, S. (2015). Brothers and sisters and nobody: The science behind their personality and health. Medical Daily. Retrieved from https://www.medicaldaily.com/brothers-and-sisters-and-nobody-science-behind-their-personality-and-health-317912.
  45. Orzack, S. H., Stubblefield, J. W., Akmaev, V. R., Colls, P., Munne, S., Scholl, T., … Zuckerman, J. E. (2015). The human sex ratio from conception to birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, E2102–E2111.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416546112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Questionnaire Codebooks for Waves I, II, III and IV. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2016, from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/codebooks.
  47. Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9881-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Joyner, K. (2014). The dubious assessment of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents of Add Health. Archives of Sexual Behavior,43, 413–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0219-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Savin-Williams, R. C., Joyner, K., & Rieger, G. (2012). Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity during young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9913-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schagen, S. E. E., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., Blanchard, R., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2012). Sibling sex ratio and birth order in early-onset gender dysphoric adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 541–549.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9777-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Skaletsky, H., Kuroda-Kawaguchi, T., Minx, P. J., Cordum, H. S., Hillier, L. Brown, L. G., … Page, D. C. (2003). The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature, 423, 825–837.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skorska, M. N., Blanchard, R., VanderLaan, D. P., Zucker, K. J., & Bogaert, A. F. (2017). Gay male only-children: Evidence for low birth weight and high maternal miscarriage rates. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0829-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Skorska, M. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2017a). Pubertal stress and nutrition and their association with sexual orientation and height in the Add Health data. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 217–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0800-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Skorska, M. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2017b). Sibling sex ratio and the fraternal birth order effect related to men’s sexual orientation, in the Add Health data: A re-analysis and extended findings. Presented at the International Academy of Sex Research. Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
  55. Skorska, M. N., Geniole, S. N., Vrysen, B. M., McCormick, C. M., & Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Facial structure predicts sexual orientation in both men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 1377–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0454-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Swift-Gallant, A., Coome, L. A., Monks, D. A., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2018a). Gender nonconformity and birth order in relation to anal sex role among gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1041–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0980-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Swift-Gallant, A., Coome, L. A., Skorska, M. N., Monks, D. A., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2018b). Pubertal onset and anal sex role among gay men. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity,6, 107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. VanderLaan, D. P., Blanchard, R., Wood, H., Garzon, L. C., & Zucker, K. J. (2015). Birth weight and two possible types of maternal effects on male sexual orientation: A clinical study of children and adolescents referred to a gender identity service. Developmental Psychobiology,57, 25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. VanderLaan, D. P., Blanchard, R., Wood, H., & Zucker, K. J. (2014). Birth order and sibling sex ratio of children and adolescents referred to a gender identity service. PLoS ONE,9, e90257.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090257.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Wampold, C. H. (2018). The association between fraternal birth order and anal-erotic roles of men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 2445–2454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1237-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu, Y., Norton, S., & Rahman, Q. (2019). Early life conditions and adolescent sexual orientation: A prospective birth cohort study. Developmental Psychology,55, 1226–1243.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zietsch, B. P. (2018). Reasons for caution about the fraternal birth order effect [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 47–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1086-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Toronto MississaugaMississaugaCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  3. 3.Department of Health SciencesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations