Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 305–316 | Cite as

Humanizing an Invisible Population in India: Voices from Bisexual Men Concerning Identity, Life Experiences, and Sexual Health

  • Swagata Banik
  • Brian DodgeEmail author
  • Megan Schmidt-Sane
  • Murugesan Sivasubramanian
  • Jessamyn Bowling
  • Shruta Mengle Rawat
  • Alpana Dange
  • Vivek Anand
Special Section: Bisexual Health

Abstract

Research examining the sexual identities, behaviors, and experiences of bisexual men outside of Western contexts (including in India) is limited. Individuals who self-identify as bisexual due to their orientation toward partners of more than one gender face distinct psychosocial challenges relative to exclusively heterosexual, gay/lesbian, or other individuals. We conducted four focus group discussions (n = 22) and in-depth interviews (n = 50) with self-identified bisexual men (age 18 years and older) who were recruited from the metropolitan area of Mumbai, India, between June and August 2013. We triangulated and analyzed focus group and interview data using standard qualitative research techniques. Findings from our study suggest that multiple factors influence the sexual experiences of self-identified bisexual men in Mumbai, including contexts of sexual interactions, sexual positioning, and the gender of sexual partners. Participants described cultural meaning systems and psychosocial dynamics that regulate bisexual identity development, disclosure, and sexual decision making with male, female, and other partners. Secrecy, discretion, and sexual pleasure also influenced sexual behaviors and relationships. Although Western sexual identity categories are not necessarily equivalent in the Indian context, it is interesting and important to note that a number of individuals in India continue to use the identity label of “bisexual.” Before developing interventions to meet unique sexual health needs of bisexual men, it is crucial to understand how these men perceive themselves, reconcile the ordinary aspects of their lives with their sexuality, and structure their relationships with partners.

Keywords

Bisexual men Mumbai India Identity Life experiences Sexual health Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the staff of the Humsafar Trust, whose insight and collaboration guided the researchers throughout the study process. We also deeply appreciate the investment and support in this ongoing partnership, in particular, from the Office of the Vice President for International Affairs, as well as the Institute for Advanced Study, at Indiana University—Bloomington.

Funding

The formative and sustaining resources for this academic–research partnership were sponsored by the Office of the Vice President for International Affairs at Indiana University—Bloomington (Brian Dodge, Ph.D.). Additional grant funding was awarded by the Institute for Advanced Study at Indiana University—Bloomington—and the Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington (Brian Dodge, Ph.D.). During the process of data collection, Dr. Banik was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R21 DA033719 (Swagata Banik, Principal Investigator). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Supplementary material

10508_2018_1361_MOESM1_ESM.doc (64 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 64 kb)

References

  1. Asthana, S., & Oostvogels, R. (2001). The social construction of male ‘homosexuality’ in India: Implications for HIV transmission and prevention. Social Science and Medicine, 52(5), 707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banik, S. (2008). Cultural dimension of male sexual behavior and HIV risk in South Asia with special emphasis on India: A commentary. Journal of LGBT Health Research, 4(2–3), 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banik, S., Fisher, L., & Anand, V. R. (2014). Expression and experiences of sexual identity among married men who have sex with men in India. Health Education Monographs, 31(2), 62–72.Google Scholar
  4. Bostwick, W., & Hequembourg, A. (2014). ‘Just a little hint’: Bisexual-specific microaggressions and their connection to epistemic injustices. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 16(5), 488–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyce, P., & Khanna, A. (2011). Rights and representations: Querying the male-to-male sexual subject in India. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13(1), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, A. D., Fisher, J. D., & Benziger, T. J. (2011). Determinants of HIV risk among Indian truck drivers. Social Science and Medicine, 53(11), 1413–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dolezal, C., Nieves, L., Díaz, F., Decena, C., & Balan, I. (2004). Looking for a tall, dark, macho man…sexual-role behaviour variations in Latino gay and bisexual men. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 6, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Closson, E. F., Sivasubramanian, M., Mayer, K. J., Srivastava, A., Safren, S. A., Anand, V., & Mimiaga, M. J. (2014). The other side of the bridge: Exploring the sexual relationships of men who have sex with men and their female partners in Mumbai, India. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 16(7), 780–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dandona, L., Dandona, R., Gutierrez, J. P., Kumar, G. A., McPherson, S., & Bertozzi, S. M. (2005). Sex behaviour of men who have sex with men and risk of HIV in Andhra Pradesh, India. AIDS, 19(6), 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodge, B., Banik, S., Bowling, J., Sivasubramanian, M., Mengle, S., Schick, V., … Anand, V. (2016a). Sexual relationships, behaviors, and experiences among bisexual men in Mumbai, India. International Journal of Sexual Health, 28(1), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge, B., Herbenick, D., Friedman, M. R., Schick, V., Fu, T. C., Bostwick, W., … Sandfort, T. G. M. (2016b). Attitudes toward bisexual men and women among a nationally representative probability sample of adults in the United States. PLoS ONE, 11(10), 58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodge, B., Jeffries, W. L., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2008). Beyond the down low: Sexual risk, protection, and disclosure among at-risk Black men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(5), 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodge, B., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2007). A review of mental health research on bisexual individuals when compared to homosexual and heterosexual individuals. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Becoming visible: Counseling bisexuals across the lifespan (pp. 28–51). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dodge, B., Schnarrs, P. W., Reece, M., Goncalves, G., Martinez, O., Nix, R., … Fortenberry, J. D. (2012a). Community involvement among behaviorally bisexual men in the midwestern USA: Experiences and perceptions across communities. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 14(9), 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodge, B., Schnarrs, P. W., Reece, M., Martinez, O., Goncalves, G., Malebranche, D., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2012b). Individual and social factors related to mental health concerns among bisexual men in the midwestern United States. Journal of Bisexuality, 12(2), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodge, B., Schnarrs, P. W., Reece, M., Martinez, O., Goncalves, G., Malebranche, D., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). Sexual behaviors and experiences among behaviorally bisexual men in the midwestern United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(2), 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  20. Garcia, J., Muñoz-Laboy, M., Parker, R., & Wilson, P. A. (2014). Sex markets and sexual opportunity structures of behaviorally bisexual Latino men in the urban metropolis of New York City. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greig, A. (2003). HIV prevention with men: Towards gender equality and social justice. Brasilia: United Nations. Retrieved November 23, 2018 from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/men-boys2003/EP7-Greig.pdf.
  22. Herdt, G. (Ed.). (1994). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  23. Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual stigma and prejudice in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Humsafar Trust. (2018). About us. Retrieved November 23, 2018 from https://humsafar.org/about-us/.
  25. Jeffries, W. L., & Dodge, B. (2007). Male bisexuality and condom use at last sexual encounter Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 44(3), 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeffries, W. L., Dodge, B., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2008). Religion and spirituality among bisexual Black men in the USA. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 10(5), 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan, S. (2001). Culture, sexualities, and identities: Men who have sex with men in India. Journal of Homosexuality, 40(3–4), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumta, S., Lurie, M., Weitzen, S., Jerajani, H., Gogate, A., Row-Kavi, A., & Mayer, K. H. (1999). Bisexuality, sexual risk taking, and HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men accessing voluntary counseling and testing services in Mumbai, India. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 53(2), 45–50.Google Scholar
  29. Laumann, E. O., Ellingson, S., Mahay, J., & Paik, A. (2004). The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malebranche, D. J. (2008). Bisexually active Black men in the United States and HIV: Acknowledging more than the “down low”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(5), 810–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez, O., Dodge, B., Reece, M., Schnarrs, P. W., Rhodes, S. D., Goncalves, G., & Nix, R. (2011). Sexual health and life experiences: Voices from behaviorally bisexual Latino men in the midwestern USA. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13(9), 1073–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCormack, M., Anderson, E., & Adams, A. (2014). Cohort effect on the coming out experiences of bisexual men. Sociology, 48(6), 1207–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Millett, G., Malebranche, D., & Mason, B. (2005). Focusing “down low”: Bisexual black men, HIV risk and heterosexual transmission. Journal of the National Medical Association, 97(7), 52S–59S.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Muñoz-Laboy, M., & Dodge, B. (2005). Bisexual practices: Patterns, meanings, and implications for HIV/STI prevention among bisexually active Latino men and their partners. Journal of Bisexuality, 5, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muñoz-Laboy, M., Leau, C. J., Sriram, V., Weinstein, H. J., del Aquila, E. V., & Parker, R. (2009). Bisexual desire and familism: Latino/a bisexual young men and women in New York City. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 11(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muñoz-Laboy, M., Parker, R., Perry, A., & Garcia, J. (2013). Alternative frameworks for examining Latino male bisexuality in the urban space: A theoretical commentary based on ethnographic research in Rio de Janeiro and New York. Sexualities, 16(5–6), 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narayanan, P., Das, A., Morineau, G., Prabhakar, P., Deshpande, G. R., Gangakhedkar, R., & Risbud, A. (2013). An exploration of elevated HIV and STI risk among male sex workers from India. BMC Public Health, 13, 1059.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1059.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. National AIDS Control Organization, India. (2016). Annual report. Retrieved from: http://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/NACO%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202016-17.pdf.
  39. Patel, V. V., Mayer, K. H., & Makadon, H. J. (2012). Men who have sex with men in India: A diverse population in need of medical attention. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 136(4), 563–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Safren, S. A., Martin, C., Menon, S., Greer, J., Solomon, S., Mimiaga, M. J., & Mayer, K. H. (2006). A survey of MSM HIV prevention outreach workers in Chennai, India. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18(4), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shinde, S., Setia, M. S., Row-Kavi, A., Anand, V., & Jerajani, H. (2009). Male sex workers: Are we ignoring a risk group in Mumbai, India? Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 75(1), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh, Y. N., & Malaviya, A. N. (1994). Long distance truck drivers in India: HIV infection and their possible role in disseminating HIV into rural areas. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 5(2), 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verma, R. K., & Collumbien, M. (2004). Homosexual activity among rural Indian men: Implications for HIV interventions. AIDS, 18, 1845–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Welles, S., Ross, M., Banik, S., Fisher, L., McFarlane, M., Kachur, R., & Allensworth-Davies, D. (2011). Demographic and sexual behavior comparisons of Indian and U.S. internet samples of men who have sex with men. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(2), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Prevention SciencesBaldwin Wallace UniversityBereaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public HealthIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  4. 4.Humsafar TrustMumbaiIndia
  5. 5.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of North CarolinaCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations