Advertisement

Developing an Integrative Approach to Female Sexual Desire: The Advances and Drawbacks of Relational and Bodily Experiences Theory

  • Nicholas VelottaEmail author
  • Pepper Schwartz
Commentary
  • 69 Downloads

There seems to be a significant amount of new writing and research on the subject of female sexual desire and we welcome it. For a while, it seemed that there was no further discussion on the etiology or nature of female desire other than debates on the work of Helen Kaplan, Rosemary Basson, or clinical evaluations of hypo- or hypersexual desire. Recently, however, younger scholars are readdressing the subject in more multivariate ways. This is particularly true of the Target Article by Cherkasskaya and Rosario (2018), and we find it an innovative and provocative approach to understanding why female desire may be intense among some women or suppressed or modest in others. We particularly appreciate Cherkasskaya and Rosario’s work in specifying the influence of attachment styles (included within their construct of “relational experiences”) and “bodily experiences,” which are composed of “self-subjectivity,” “self-objectivity,” and genital self-image on female sexual desire. However, as...

References

  1. Blair, K. L., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Can less be more?: Comparing duration vs. frequency of sexual encounters in same-sex and mixed-sex relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 123–136.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work and sex (1st ed.). New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  3. Cherkasskaya, E., & Rosario, M. (2018). The relational and bodily experiences theory of sexual desire in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1212-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Guay, A. T., & Spark, R. (2006). Pathophysiology of sex steroids in women. In I. Goldstein, C. M. Meston, S. Davis, & A. Traish (Eds.), Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: Study, diagnosis and treatment (pp. 218–227). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Herbenick, D., Schick, V., Reece, M., Sanders, S., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: Prevalence, methods, and characteristics. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(10), 3322–3330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01935.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaplan, H. S. (1995). The sexual desire disorders: Dysfunctional regulation of sexual motivation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  7. Schwartz, P., & Velotta, N. (2018a). Gender and sexuality in aging. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 329–347). Berlin: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schwartz, P., & Velotta, N. (2018b). The changing nature of intimate and sexual relationships in later life. Journal of Aging Life Care, 28(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  9. Tracy, J. K., & Junginger, J. (2007). Correlates of lesbian sexual functioning. Journal of Women’s Health, 16(4), 499–509.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Velotta, N., & Schwartz, P. (2019). Rethinking love, intimacy, and sexual relationships in the later years. In L. Kaye & C. Singer (Eds.), Social isolation in later life: Strategies for bolstering health and well-being (pp. 219–234). Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations