A Randomized Pilot Study of a Group-Delivered HIV Risk Reduction Intervention for At-Risk Urban Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Regularly Attend Private Sex Events
Across HIV prevention studies, as many as 25% of men who have sex with men (MSM) report meeting male partners at private sex events and attendance is associated with increased number of sexual partners, condomless anal sex (CAS), and HIV infection. Despite the need for effective HIV prevention interventions, no risk reduction interventions have been tested to reduce HIV sexual risk of MSM that regularly engage in sexual risk at private sex events. This randomized pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of an HIV risk reduction intervention to reduce CAS among urban MSM (N = 14) reporting risk at a private sex event in the prior 12 months. The intervention arm received four group sessions (2 h/session) focusing on HIV risk reduction education and skills building. Both the intervention (n = 8) and control (n = 6) conditions received HIV testing and pre- and posttest risk reduction counseling and completed a sexual risk and psychosocial assessment visit at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. In addition, intervention participants completed a brief exit interview post-intervention. Mean age was 37 years, and 57% were racial/ethnic minorities. At follow-up, the intervention group reported greater reductions in sexual risk behavior in the past 3 months including number of CAS episodes, number of partners at private sex events, and CAS episodes at private sex events. The intervention group also reported reduced sexual compulsivity, increases in HIV disclosure, and reduced drug use at private sex events over study follow-up. Exit interviews revealed that participants found the intervention to be highly acceptable. Findings demonstrate feasibility of procedures, participant acceptability, and initial promise of a group-delivered HIV risk reduction intervention for MSM who attend and engage in CAS at private sex events. Further testing of this intervention in a larger pilot randomized controlled trial is warranted.
KeywordsHIV MSM Private sex events Gay venues Sexual risk behavior Sexual orientation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993). Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Bouhnik, A.-D., Préau, M., Schiltz, M.-A., Peretti-Watel, P., Obadia, Y., Lert, F., & Spire, B. (2006). Unsafe sex with casual partners and quality of life among HIV-infected gay men: Evidence from a large representative sample of outpatients attending French hospitals (ANRS-EN12-VESPA). Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 42(5), 597–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). HIV in the United States: At a glance. Retrieved 21 May, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Denning, P. (2004). Practicing harm reduction therapy: An alternative approach to addictions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Drumright, L. N., Little, S. J., Strathdee, S. A., Slymen, D. J., Araneta, M. R. G., Malcarne, V. L., et al. (2006). Unprotected anal intercourse and substance use among men who have sex with men with recent HIV infection. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 43(3), 344–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duru, O., Collins, R., Ciccarone, D., Morton, S., Stall, R., Beckman, R., et al. (2006). Correlates of sex without serostatus disclosure among a national probability sample of HIV patients. AIDS and Behavior, 10(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9089-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenwood, G. L., White, E. W., Page-Shafer, K., Bein, E., Osmond, D. H., Paul, J., & Stall, R. D. (2001). Correlates of heavy substance use among young gay and bisexual men: The San Francisco Young Men’s Health Study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 61(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00129-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herbst, J. H., Beeker, C., Mathew, A., McNally, T., Passin, W., Kay, L. S., et al. (2007). The effectiveness of individual-, group-, and community-level HIV behavioral risk-reduction interventions for adult men who have sex with men: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(4 Suppl.), S38–S67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, M. A., DeVellis, B. M., & Sleath, B. (2002). Social influence and interpersonal communication in health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 240–264). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lyles, C. M., Kay, L. S., Crepaz, N., Herbst, J. H., Passin, W. F., Kim, A. S., et al. (2007). Best-evidence interventions: Findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000–2004. American Journal of Public Health, 97(1), 133–143.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marlatt, G. A. (1998). Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Marlatt, G. A., Larimer, M. E., & Witkiewitz, K. (2011). Harm reduction, Second edition: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, K. H., Mimiaga, M. J., Cohen, D., Grasso, C., Bill, R., VanDerwarker, R., & Fisher, A. (2008). Tenofovir DF plus lamivudine or emtricitabine for nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (NPEP) in a Boston community health center. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 47(4), 494–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mimiaga, M. J., Case, P., Johnson, C. V., Safren, S. A., & Mayer, K. H. (2009a). Pre-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis (PrEP) attitudes in high risk Boston area MSM: Limited knowledge and experience, but potential for increased utilization after education. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 50(1), 77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mimiaga, M. J., Reisner, S. L., Bland, S., Cranston, K., Isenberg, D., Driscoll, M. A., et al. (2010a). “It’s a quick way to get what you want”: A formative exploration of HIV risk among urban Massachusetts men who have sex with men who attend sex parties. AIDS Patient Care and STDS, 24(10), 659–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mimiaga, M. J., Reisner, S. L., Cranston, K., Isenberg, D., Bright, D., Daffin, G., et al. (2009b). Sexual mixing patterns and partner characteristics of Black MSM in Massachusetts at increased for HIV risk for HIV infection and transmission. Journal of Urban Health, 86(4), 602–623.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mimiaga, M. J., Reisner, S. L., Tetu, A. M., Bonafide, K. E., Cranston, K., Bertrand, T., et al. (2009c). Partner notification after STD and HIV exposures and infections: Knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Massachusetts men who have sex with men. Public Health Reports, 124(1), 111–119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parsons, J. T., Schrimshaw, E. W., Wolitski, R. J., Halkitis, P. N., Purcell, D. W., Hoff, C. C., & Gómez, C. A. (2005). Sexual harm reduction practices of HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men: Serosorting, strategic positioning, and withdrawal before ejaculation. AIDS, 19(Suppl. 1), S13–S25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Purcell, D. W., Johnson, C. H., Lansky, A., Prejean, J., Stein, R., Denning, P., … Crepaz, N. (2012). Suppl 1: Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. The Open AIDS Journal, 6, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010098.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reisner, S. L., Mimiaga, M. J., Skeer, M., Vanderwarker, R., Gaucher, M. J., O’Connor, C. A., et al. (2009b). Differential HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men seeking health-related mobile van services at diverse gay-specific venues. AIDS and Behavior, 13, 822–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health education and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 465–486). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sanchez, T., Finlayson, T., Drake, A., Behel, S., Cribbin, M., Dinenno, E., et al. (2006). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: Men who have sex with men, November 2003–April 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 55(SS6), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, M., McRee, B., & Babor, T. F. (1992). Evaluation of the reliability of AUDIT. Farmington: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Alcohol Research Center.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). CES-D Scale. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health.Google Scholar