Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships
Evolutionary psychological research has studied romantic jealousy extensively within monogamous relationships, but has largely ignored jealousy among partners who mutually consent to forming extra-pair relationships (i.e., consensual non-monogamy; CNM). We examined monogamous (n = 529) and CNM (n = 159) individuals’ reactions to imagining their romantic partner(s)’s extra-pair involvement. For each romantic partner, men and women completed measures of relationship jealousy and reacted to scenarios of their partner’s extra-pair emotional and sexual involvement. Scenarios prompted participants to indicate which type of involvement would be more distressing and more enjoyable. They also described whether or not participants had consented to their partner’s extradyadic relationship. Monogamous men were more distressed by a partner’s extradyadic sexual versus emotional involvement (and a partner’s emotional involvement was more enjoyable) whether the scenario was consensual or not. Monogamous women were more distressed by a partner’s emotional versus sexual involvement (and a partner’s sexual involvement was more enjoyable) for consensual, but not non-consensual, scenarios. There were no gender differences among CNM participants. Monogamous individuals reported greater emotional distress toward a partner’s imagined extradyadic involvement, whereas CNM individuals reported thinking about their partner’s extra-pair relationships more frequently. Monogamous (vs. CNM) individuals reported greater confidence that their partner would never cheat on them (i.e., enter another relationship without their consent), and CNM participants were more confident that their primary versus secondary partner would never cheat, although this effect was stronger among CNM women. Moreover, CNM participants rated that it was more important that their primary versus secondary partner did not cheat, and reported greater distress imagining that their primary versus secondary partner had cheated. Women in CNM relationships rated it more important that their partner did not cheat sexually than emotionally. Finally, we replicated previous research showing that monogamous individuals mate guard more than CNM individuals, who mate guard their primary versus secondary partner more frequently. Future directions for developing evolutionary and romantic relationship research on CNM are discussed.
KeywordsJealousy Compersion Consensual non-monogamy Polyamory Gender differences
- Anapol, D. T. (1998). Compersion: Meditations on using jealousy as a path to unconditional love. San Rafael, CA: IntinNet Resource Center.Google Scholar
- Aumer, K., Bellew, W., Ito, B., Hatfield, E., & Heck, R. (2014). The happy green eyed monogamist: Role of jealousy and compersion in monogamous and non-traditional relationships. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 17, 77–88.Google Scholar
- Campbell, L., & Loving, T. J. (2016). Love and commitment in romantic relationships. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 482–498). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chapman, M. (2010). What does polyamory look like? Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 88–114). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Duma, U. (2009). Jealousy and compersion in close relationships: Coping styles by relationship types. Unpublished thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Psychologisches Institut.Google Scholar
- Durante, K. M., Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Pair-bonded relationships and romantic alternatives: Toward an integration of evolutionary and relationship science perspectives. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 1–74.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, A. M., Muñoz, J. A., Dufey, M., Pavez, P., Baeza, C. G., & Kinkead, P. (2015). Sex differences in jealousy are not explained by attachment style in men and women from Chile. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30, 138–150.Google Scholar
- Goldfeder, M., & Sheff, E. (2013). Children of polyamorous families: A first empirical look. Journal of Law & Social Deviance, 5, 150–243.Google Scholar
- Jonason, P. K., & Balzarini, R. N. (2016). Unweaving the rainbow of human sexuality: A review of one-night stands, serious romantic relationships, and the relationship space in between. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 13–28). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
- Loue, S. (2006). Multi-bonding: Polygamy, polygyny, polyamory. In S. Loue (Ed.), Sexual partnering, sexual practices, and health (pp. 27–53). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Nordgren, A. (2006). The short instructional manifesto for relationship anarchy. The Anarchist Library. Retrieved from https://theanarchistlibrary.org.
- Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., Holden, C. J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Hummel, A., & Memering, S. L. (2014). Partner attractiveness moderates the relationship between number of sexual rivals and in-pair copulation frequency in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 328–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pitagora, D. (2013). Consent vs. coercion: BDSM interactions highlight a fine but immutable line. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10, 27–36.Google Scholar
- Salkicevic, S., Stanic, A. L., & Grabovac, M. T. (2014). Good mates retain us right: Investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(5), 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheff, E. (2013). Jealousy and compersion with multiple partners—How polys deal with jealousy and feel happy when their lover loves someone else. Psychology Today. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201312/jealousy-and-compersion-multiple-partners-1.
- Taormino, T. (2008). Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. San Francisco: Cleis Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection (Vol. 136, p. 179). Cambridge, MA: Biological Laboratories, Harvard University.Google Scholar