Power Affects Sexual Assertiveness and Sexual Esteem Equally in Women and Men
Common stereotypes hold that men and women differ strongly in their attitudes toward sex and that such differences are amplified by social power. In contrast, an emerging literature suggests that social power affects both sexes similarly, thus potentially attenuating differences between the sexes. Four samples obtained in the Netherlands, the U.S., Britain, and South-East Asia (total N = 1985) test the effect of social power (operationalized as self-reported amount of power over others at the work place) on validated self-report measures of sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem. Across all samples, power was associated with greater sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem—equally for men and women. Furthermore, effects of power were larger and more consistent than differences between men and women. These findings add to an emerging literature, suggesting that often-observed differences between male and female sexuality actually reflect power differences. This suggests that such differences decrease with greater social equality.
KeywordsPower Sexuality Gender differences Gender equality
- Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. R. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cartwright, D. (1959). A field theoretical conception of power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 183–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- De Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee politics. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Diamond, J. (2012). The Petraeus paradox: Why do so many powerful men get caught with their pants down? Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jed-diamond/petraeus-sex-scandal_b_2199187.html. Accessed 13 August 2018.
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guinote, A. (2010). The situated focus theory of power. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 141–173). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Laws, J., & Schwartz, P. (1977). Sexual scripts: The social construction of female sexuality. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
- Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Von Bredow, R. (2011). Sex and power: Powerful men have an overactive libido. Spiegel. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/sex-and-power-powerful-men-have-an-overactive-libido-a-765316.html. Accessed 13 August 2018.
- Watson, R. P. (2012). Affairs of state: The untold history of Presidential love, sex, and scandal, 1789–1900. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar