Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 577–588 | Cite as

Interactions Between Direct and Structural Violence in Sexual Harassment Against Spanish and Unauthorized Migrant Women

  • Pilar Rodríguez-MartínezEmail author
  • Cristina Cuenca-Piqueras
Original Paper

Abstract

This article analyzes the intersection of direct and indirect violence against Spanish women and unauthorized migrant women working in precarious jobs in Almeria (Spain). Specifically, it seeks to understand how unauthorized migrant women define violence, the relationship between sexual harassment and other types of direct violence (such as intimate partner violence), and structural, legal, and cultural violence. To do this, we apply a multilevel intersectional analysis focusing on 32 interviews with Spanish and unauthorized migrant women. Three levels of intersectionality are shown. In the first, the interviewees do not label verbal abuse as sexual harassment. They attribute the abuse to their work. In the second, sexual harassment seems to be tied to “respect” and not “love,” which explains why sexual harassment has less devastating consequences for women than intimate partner violence. In the third, experiences of sexual harassment differ between Spanish women and unauthorized migrant women, and a combination of sexual harassment and xenophobic and racist behavior occasionally appeared.

Keywords

Intersectional analysis Sexual harassment Structural violence Unauthorized migrant women Domestic work Sex work 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Anthias, F. (2012). Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Toward a translocational frame. International Sociology, 28, 121–138.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912463155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchanan, N. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2008). Effects of racial and sexual harassment on work and the psychological well-being of African American women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.2.137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, N. T., & Ormerod, A. J. (2002). Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of African American women. Women & Therapy, 25, 105–124.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v25n03_08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., Wu, I. H. C., & Hayashino, D. S. (2018). Sexual harassment, racial harassment, and well-being among Asian American women: An intersectional approach. Women & Therapy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2018.1425030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CCOO. (2000). El acoso sexual en el trabajo en España. Madrid: CCOO.Google Scholar
  6. CCOO. (2002). El acoso sexual en el trabajo en España. Madrid: CCOO.Google Scholar
  7. Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129–149.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christian, M., & Namaganda, A. (2018). Transnational intersectionality and domestic work: The production of Ugandan intersectional racialized and gendered domestic worker regimes. International Sociology, 28, 121–138.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918764059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, B. A. (2009). Gender, narratives and intersectionality: can personal experience approaches to research contribute to ‘‘undoing gender’’? International Review of Education, 55, 561–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-009-9140-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crenshaw, K. W. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. In D. K. Weisberg (Ed.), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383–395). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cuenca, C. (2014). Incidencia en los tipos de acoso sexual en el trabajo en España. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 66, 125–149. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/105/10531453005.pdf.
  12. Das, A. (2009). Sexual harassment at work in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 909–921.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9354-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword. A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, C. (2014). Gendered readings of change. A feminist-pragmatist approach. New York: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, L., Swan, S., & Magley, V. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment. Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/422690.
  17. Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 1, 301–320.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243298012003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01910.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, G. (2018). Intersectionality: Locating and critiquing internal structures of oppression within feminism. In C. Hay (Ed.), Philosophy: Feminism (pp. 121–138). New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  20. Ibáñez, M., Lezaun, Z., Serrano, M., & Tomás, G. (2007). Acoso sexual en el ámbito laboral. Su alcance en la C.A de Euskadi. Deusto: Universidad de Deusto.Google Scholar
  21. ILO. (2000). ABC of women workers’ rights and gender equality. Ginebra: ILO.Google Scholar
  22. Inmark. (2006). El acoso sexual a las mujeres en el ámbito laboral: Resumen de resultados. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Instituto de la Mujer.Google Scholar
  23. Leung, L. (2017). Intersectional challenges: Marginalization of ethnic minority sexual assault survivors in Hong Kong. Affilia, 32, 217–229.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109916678026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mellgren, C., Andersson, M., & Ivert, A. (2017). “It happens all the time”: Women’s experiences and normalization of sexual harassment in public space. Women & Criminal Justice.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2017.1372328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Hare, E., & O’Donohue, W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 561–580.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018769016832.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Parish, W., Das, A., & Laumann, E. (2006). Sexual harassment of women in urban China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 411–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9079-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodríguez Martínez, P. (2015). An intersectional analysis of intimate partner violence and workplace: Violence among women working in prostitution. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 151, 123–138.  https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.151.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultz, V. (1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. Yale Law Journal, 107, 1683–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tangri, S., Burt, M., & Johnson, L. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01909.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tester, G. (2008). An intersectional analysis of sexual harassment in housing. Gender and Society, 22, 349–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208317827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2004). Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. American Sociological Review, 69, 64–92.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weigert, M. K. (2015). Structural violence against women. In M. M. Kurtz & L. R. Kurtz (Eds.), Women, war and violence (pp. 65–83). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Welsh, S., Carr, J., MacQuarrie, B., & Huntley, A. (2006). I’m not thinking of it as sexual harassment: Understanding harassment across race and citizenship. Gender and Society, 20, 87–107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205282785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, C. L. (2002). Sexual harassment and sadomasochism. Hypatia, 17, 99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00768.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winker, G., & Degele, N. (2011). Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women Studies, 18, 51–66.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810386084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woods, K. C., Buchanan, N. T., & Settles, I. H. (2009). Sexual harassment across the color line: Experiences and outcomes of cross- versus intraracial sexual harassment among Black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15, 67–76.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 196–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pilar Rodríguez-Martínez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristina Cuenca-Piqueras
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Historia, Georgafia y HumanidadesUniversity of AlmeriaAlmeríaSpain

Personalised recommendations