Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 1015–1024 | Cite as

Butch–Femme Identity and Visuospatial Performance Among Lesbian and Bisexual Women in China

Original Paper

Abstract

Lesbian and bisexual women who self-identify as “butch” show a masculine profile with regard to gender roles, gender nonconformity, and systemizing cognitive style, whereas lesbian and bisexual women who self-identify as “femme” show a corresponding feminine profile and those who self-identify as “androgynes” show an intermediate profile. This study examined the association between butch or femme lesbian or bisexual identity and visuospatial ability among 323 lesbian and bisexual women, compared to heterosexual women (n = 207) and men (n = 125), from multiple cities in China. Visuospatial ability was assessed using a Shepard and Metzler-type mental rotation task and Judgment of Line Angle and Position (JLAP) test on the Internet. Heterosexual men outperformed heterosexual women on both mental rotation and JLAP tasks. Lesbian and bisexual women outperformed heterosexual women on mental rotation, but not on JLAP. There were significant differences in mental rotation performance among women, with butch- and androgyne-identified lesbian/bisexual women outperforming femme-identified and heterosexual women. There were also significant differences in JLAP performance among women, with butch- and androgyne-identified lesbian/bisexual women and heterosexual women outperforming femme-identified lesbian/bisexual women. The butch–femme differences in visuospatial ability indicated an association between cognitive ability and butch–femme identity and suggest that neurobiological underpinnings may contribute to butch–femme identity although alternative explanations exist.

Keywords

Spatial ability Lesbians Mental rotation Judgment of Line Angle and Position Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1709244).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alivisatos, B., & Petrides, M. (1997). Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 111–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, B. M., Smulders, T. V., & Wallenberg, J. C. (2017). An endocrine basis for tomboy identity: The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in “tomboys”. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 79, 9–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behaviour and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The Systemizing Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B-Biological Sciences, 358, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassett, J., Pearcey, S., & Dabbs, J. M. (2001). Jealousy and partner preference among butch and femme lesbians. Psychology, Evolution, & Gender, 3, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belfi, A. M., Conrad, A. L., Dawson, J., & Nopoulos, P. (2014). Masculinity/femininity predicts brain volumes in normal healthy children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39, 25–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, W. M., Finn, C. J., Cooke, B. M., & Breedlove, S. M. (2002). Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 123–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton, L., Henninger, D., & Hafetz, J. (2005). Gender differences in relationships of mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios as hormonal indices. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 493–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W., & Thulborn, K. (1999). Graded functional activation in the visuospatial system with the amount of task demand. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 9–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1990). Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12, 73–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherney, I. D., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in line judgment: Relation to mathematics preparation and strategy use. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 615–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, K. M. (2002). Relationships among childhood sex-atypical behavior, spatial ability, handedness, and sexual orientation in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 129–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Collaer, M. L. (2001). Judgment of Line Angle and Position Test-15 line version (JLAP-15). Unpublished test, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT.Google Scholar
  17. Collaer, M. L., & Nelson, J. D. (2002). Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: Possible role of attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 49, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Collaer, M. L., Reimers, S., & Manning, J. T. (2007). Visuospatial performance on an Internet line judgment task and potential hormonal markers: Sex, sexual orientation, and 2D:4D. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 177–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladue, B. A., & Bailey, J. M. (1995). Spatial ability, handedness, and human sexual orientation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 20, 487–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gogos, A., Gavrilescu, M., Davison, S., Searle, K., Adams, J., & Rossell, S. L., … Gary, F. E. (2010). Greater superior than inferior parietal lobule activation with increasing rotation angle during mental rotation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 529–535.Google Scholar
  21. Grimbos, T., Dawood, K., Burriss, R. P., Zucker, K. J., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: A meta-analysis in men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124, 278–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., … Gur, R. E. (2000). An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task. Brain and Language, 74, 157–170.Google Scholar
  23. Halpern, D., Benbow, C., Geary, D. C., Gur, R., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton, C. J. (1995). Beyond sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: The impact of gender trait possession. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampson, E., & Moffat, S. D. (2004). The psychobiology of gender: Cognitive effects of reproductive hormones in the adult nervous system. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 38–64). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, I. M., & Miniussi, C. (2003). Parietal lobe contribution to mental rotation demonstrated with rTMS. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 315–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hassan, B., & Rahman, Q. (2007). Selective sexual orientation-related differences in object location memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 625–633.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan, K., Heinze, H. J., Lutz, K., Kanowski, M., & Jancke, L. (2001). Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects. Neuroimage, 13, 143–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimura, D. (2002). Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 67–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Koscik, T., Dan, O., Moser, D. J., Andreasen, N. C., & Nopoulos, P. (2009). Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: Relationship to mental rotation performance. Brain and Cognition, 69, 451–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Levitt, H. M., Gerrish, E. A., & Hiestand, K. R. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levitt, H. M., & Hiestand, K. R. (2004). A quest for authenticity: Contemporary butch gender. Sex Roles, 50, 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt, H. M., & Hiestand, K. R. (2005). Gender within lesbian sexuality: Butch and femme perspectives. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Loulan, J. (1990). The lesbian erotic dance: Butch, femme, androgyny and other rhythms. Minneapolis, MN: Spinsters Ink.Google Scholar
  36. Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., … Soler, M. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183.Google Scholar
  38. Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 223–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: Implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 61–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nash, S. C. (1979). Sex role as mediator of intellectual functioning. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues (pp. 263–302). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  41. Nestle, J. (1992). Flamboyance and fortitude: An introduction. In J. Nestle (Ed.), The persistent desire: A femme–butch reader (pp. 13–20). Boston: Alyson.Google Scholar
  42. Nettle, D. (2007). Empathizing and systemizing: What are they, and what do they contribute to our understanding of psychological sex differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98, 237–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pearcey, S. M., Docherty, K. J., & Dabbs, J. M. (1996). Testosterone and sex role identification in lesbian couples. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 1033–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peters, M., & Battista, C. (2008). Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a Mental Rotation Stimulus Library. Brain and Cognition, 66, 260–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J., & Breedlove, S. M. (2007). Sex differences in spatial ability: Evolution, hormones and the brain. In S. M. Platek, J. P. Keenan, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary cognitive neuroscience (pp. 329–379). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rahman, Q., Bhanot, S., Emrith-Small, H., Ghafoor, S., & Roberts, S. (2012). Gender nonconformity, intelligence, and sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 623–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Large sexual-orientation-related differences in performance on mental rotation and Judgment of Line Orientation tasks. Neuropsychology, 17, 25–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., & Hunter, J. (2008). Butch/femme differences in substance use and abuse among young lesbian and bisexual women: Examination and potential explanations. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 1002–1015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., Hunter, J., & Levy-Warren, A. (2009). The coming-out process of young lesbian and bisexual women: Are there butch/femme differences in sexual identity development? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 34–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Seurnick, R., Vingerhoets, G., de Lange, F. P., & Achten, E. (2004). Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences? Neuroimage, 23, 1440–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh, D., Vidaurri, M., Zambarano, R. J., & Dabbs, J. M. (1999). Lesbian erotic role identification: Behavioral, morphological, and hormonal correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1035–1049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, C. A., Konik, J. A., & Tuve, M. V. (2011). In search of looks, status, or something else? Partner preferences among butch and femme lesbians and heterosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 64, 658–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tagaris, G. A., Kim, S. G., Strupp, J. P., Andersen, P., Uğurbil, K., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (1997). Mental rotation studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging at high field (4 TESLA): Performance and cortical activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 419–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tranel, D., Vianna, E., Manzel, K., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T. (2009). Neuroanatomical correlates of the Benton facial recognition test and judgment of line orientation test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 219–233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Vingerhoets, G., Santens, P., Van Laere, K., Lahorte, P., Dierchx, R. A., & De Reuck, J. (2001). Regional brain activity during different paradigms of mental rotation in healthy volunteers: A positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage, 13, 381–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Voyer, D., Nolan, C., & Voyer, S. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43, 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weekes, N. Y., Zaidel, D. W., & Zaidel, E. (1995). Effects of sex and sex role attributions on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 9, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wheelwright, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., & Wakabayashi, A. (2006). Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079, 47–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitam, F. L., Daskalos, C., Sobolewski, C. G., & Padilla, P. (1998). The emergence of lesbian sexuality and identity cross-culturally: Brazil, Peru, the Philippines, and the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 31–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Yan, X., Xuan, B., & Yuan, Y. (2014). 女同性恋“T”角色的身份认同现状及影响因素 [Factors related to butch-identified lesbians]. Social Psychological Science, 29, 29–35.Google Scholar
  65. Zhao, Y. (2001). 戴着草帽到处旅行——性/别, 权力, 国家 [Wearing a straw hat to travel around—Sex/gender, power, and nation]. Taiwan: Juliu Book Company.Google Scholar
  66. Zheng, L. (2012). 同性恋的角色区分研究 [Self-labels among gay and lesbians in China]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing.Google Scholar
  67. Zheng, Y., & Zheng, L. (2011). Sexual self-labels and personality differences among Chinese lesbians. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 955–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zheng, L., & Zheng, Y. (2013). Butch–femme self-label and empathizing–systemizing cognitive traits in Chinese lesbians and bisexual women. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 951–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zheng, L., & Zheng, Y. (2016). Gender nonconformity and butch–femme identity among lesbians in China. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 186–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Southwest UniversityMinistry of EducationChongqingChina
  2. 2.Faculty of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations