Dialectical Models of Deliberation, Problem Solving and Decision Making
Hamblin distinguished between formal and descriptive dialectic. Formal normative models of deliberation dialogue have been strongly emphasized as argumentation frameworks in computer science. But making such models of deliberation applicable to real natural language examples has reached a point where the descriptive aspect needs more interdisciplinary work. The new formal and computational models of deliberation dialogue that are being built in computer science seem to be closely related to some already existing and very well established computing technologies such as problem solving and decision making, but whether or how dialectical argumentation can be helpful to support these systems remains an open question. The aim of this paper is to examine some real examples of argumentation that seem to hover on the borderlines between deliberation, problem solving and decision making.
KeywordsDeliberation dialogue Typology of deliberation Computational models Changing the issue
Thanks are due to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for Insight Grant 435-2012-0104: The Carneades Argumentation System. Part of this work was supported by the Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance.
- Aakhus, Mark, and Sally Jackson. 2005. Technology, interaction, and design. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Anand, Paul. 1993. Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, Katie. 2005. What Should We Do? Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD Thesis. University of Liverpool. https://cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk/~katie/ThesisFinal.pdf.
- Black, Elizabeth, and Katie Atkinson. 2009. Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 867–874.Google Scholar
- Bransford, John D., and Barry S. Stein. 1993. The IDEAL Problem Solver: A Guide for Improving Thinking, Learning, and Creativity, 2nd ed. New York: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
- Brewka, Gerhard, and Thomas F. Gordon. 2014. How to buy a Porsche: An approach to defeasible decision making. In Working Notes of the AAAI-94 Workshop on Computational Dialectics. Seattle, Washington, 28–38.Google Scholar
- Churchman, C.West. 1971. The design of inquiring systems: Basic Concepts of systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Erol, Kutluhan, James Hendler, and Dana S. Nau. 1995. HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1123–1128.Google Scholar
- Gordon, Thomas F. 2010. An overview of the Carneades argumentation support system. In Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation, ed. C. Reed and C.W. Tindale. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
- Gordon, Thomas F. 2015. Still craving a Porsche. In Advances in knowledge representation, logic programming, and abstract argumentation: essays dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 356–359. Vol. 9060: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gordon, Thomas F. 2018. Defining Argument Weighing Functions. IFColog Journal of Logics and their Applications 5(3): 747–773.Google Scholar
- Gordon, Thomas F., and Douglas Walton. 2016. Formalizing balancing arguments. In Computational Models of Argument. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, ed. P. Baroni, T.F. Gordon, and T. Scheffler, 327–338. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Grasso, Floriana. 2015. A case for motivational argumentation. In Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and Reasoned Action, Vol. 2 http://ecargument.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ECA_Lisbon_2015_BOA.pdf.
- Hamblin, Charles. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Hulstijn, Joris, and Leendert van der Torre. 2004. Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the Non-monotonic Reasoning Workshop on Argument, Dialogue and Decision, 212–218.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, Scott. 1986. How to make an argument from examples in discourse analysis. In Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes, ed. D.G. Ellis and W.A. Donohue, 149–168. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Klein, Mark. 2017. Towards crowd-scale deliberation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2987624.
- Kok, Eric M., Ch. John-Jules, Henry Prakken Meyer, and Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk. 2011. A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues. In Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6614, ed. P. McBurney, I. Rahwan, and S. Parsons, 31–48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Medellin-Gasque, Rolando, Katie Atkinson, Peter McBurney, and Trevor Bench-Capon. 2011. Arguments over co-operative plans. In Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7132, ed. S. Modgil, N. Oren, and F. Toni, 50–66. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitroff, Ian, and Ralph Kilmann. 1978. On integrating behavioral and philosophical systems: Towards a unified theory of problem solving. Annual Series in Sociology 1: 207–236.Google Scholar
- Munier, Nolberto, Eloy Hontoria, and Fernando Jiménez-Sáez. 2019. Strategic approach in multi-criteria decision making: A practical guide for complex scenarios. In International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02726-1.
- Prakken, Henry, and Giovanni Sartor. 2009. A logical analysis of burdens of proof. In Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic, ed. H. Kaptein, H. Prakken, and B. Verheij, 223–253. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Farnham.Google Scholar
- Rahwan and Amgoud. 2007. An argumentation-based approach for practical reasoning. In Nicolas Maudet, Simon Parsons, and Iyad Rahwan, editors, ArgMAS, volume 4766 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 74–90.Google Scholar
- Reed, Chris. 1998. Dialogue frames in agent communication. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, 246–253. (ICMAS98). Paris: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
- Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. 1995. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Steele, Katie, and Orri H. Stefánsson. 2015. Decision Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/decision-theory/.
- Tang, Yuqing, Timothy J. Norman, and Simon Parsons. 2009. A model for integrating dialogue and the execution of joint plans. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 883–890.Google Scholar
- Toniolo, Alice. 2013. Models of Argument for Deliberative Dialogue in Complex Domains. University of Aberdeen. PhD thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
- Toniolo, Alice, Timothy J. Norman, and Katia Sycara. 2012. An empirical study of argumentation schemes for deliberative dialogue. In Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 242: 756–761.Google Scholar
- Van der Weide, Tom, 2011. Arguing to Motivate Decisions. PhD Thesis. Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/210788.
- Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas, and Erik C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas, and Alice Toniolo. 2016. Deliberation, practical reasoning and problem solving. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation ed. P. Bondy and L. Benacquista, Windsor, ON, 2016. http://www.dougwalton.ca/papers%20in%20pdf/16DelibPR.pdf.
- Walton, Douglas, Alice Toniolo, and Timothy J. Norman. 2014. Missing phases of deliberation dialogue for real applications. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems.Google Scholar
- Yao, Shengji. 2007. Experimental Approaches for Understanding Conceptual Design Activities. Quebec: Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University.Google Scholar