David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking

Cham (CH), Springer, (= Argumentation Library, 30) pp, xxvi, 1–553. Foreword by J. Anthony Blair
Book review
  • 35 Downloads

References

  1. Blair, J.A. 2012. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Cham (CH): Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman, J.B. 2010. “Commentary on Geoffrey C. Goddu’s “Refining Hitchcock’s Definition of ‘Argument’”. In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1–13. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
  3. Goddu, G.C. 2010. Refining Hitchcock’s Definition of ‘Argument’. In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1–10. Windsor: OSSA.Google Scholar
  4. Hitchcock, D. 1983. Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Hitchcock, D., and B. Verheij. 2006. Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenicek, M., and D. Hitchcock. 2005. Evidence-Based Practice: Logic and Critical Thinking in Medicine. Chicago: AMA Press.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest Rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Kock, C. 2017. Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing About Doing. Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies. (in Argumentation).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wohlrapp, H. 2014. The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. German original 2008. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zarefsky, D. 2014. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky. Cham (CH): Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation & RhetoricUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations