Archival Science

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 141–165 | Cite as

Archival encounters: rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives

  • Daniela AgostinhoEmail author
Original Paper


The year of 2017 marked the centennial of Denmark’s sale of the former Danish West Indies to the United States of America, today the US Virgin Islands (USVI). The colonial archives figured prominently during the year-long commemorations in Denmark, as the Danish National Archives digitized and publicly released the colonial records of the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John. Drawing on cultural theories as well as debates in archival science, this article proposes the notion of ‘archival encounter’ to centre the ethical-epistemological challenges of digitization and to emphasize the intersected problematics raised by the encounter between the colonial, the archival and the digital. The article begins by revisiting the history of these archives in order to situate the digitization of these records within debates on provenance, custody and access. It then introduces some of the debates taking place within the field of Atlantic slavery, as well as feminist and critical race theories, to argue that the digitization of the USVI records recasts questions about the limitations and possibilities of colonial archives. Furthermore, the article contends that digitality and datafication are indebted to colonial histories of quantification that structure the technological encounter with the colonial archive. Finally, the article builds on these theorizations to amplify recent calls for a feminist ethics of care in archival praxis. Drawing on postcolonial critiques, the article problematizes and situates the notion of care within the colonial and non-innocent histories in which it is embedded, in order to align ethics of care with a critical reorientation of digital colonial archives. Marshalling a postcolonial feminist critique of care as a framework for thinking, the article suggests, can help us to realign archival encounters in ways that that more pointedly confront the colonial legacies of our present.


Colonial archives United States Virgin Islands Denmark Digitization Access Postcolonial ethics of care 



This article is indebted to multiple and ongoing conversations about the legacies of colonialism in Denmark and the US Virgin Islands. I particularly thank Katrine Dirckinck-Holmfeld, La Vaughn Belle, Tami Navarro and the Uncertain Archives collective for inspiring collaborations and support. I would also like to express my gratitude to the editors of this special issue for their incredible intellectual input. Their generous and insightful comments have profoundly shaped the present version of this article. All remaining flaws can be attributed only to me.


The article is based on research funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.


  1. Agostinho D (2018) Chroma key dreams: algorithmic visibility, fleshy images and scenes of recognition. Philos Photogr 9(2):131–156Google Scholar
  2. Aljoe NN, Dillon EM, Doyle B, Hopwood E (2015) Obeah and the early caribbean digital archive. Atl Stud 12(2):258–266Google Scholar
  3. Andersen AN (2014) Islands of regret. Restitution, connected memories and the politics of history in Denmark and the US Virgin Islands. Ph.D. Thesis, Aarhus UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen AN (2018) The reparations movement in the US Virgin Islands. J Afr Am Hist 103(1–2):104–132Google Scholar
  5. Araújo AL (2017) Reparations for slavery and the slave trade: a transnational and comparative history. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastian JA (1999) Defining custody. Archival custody and its impact on the relationship between communities and historical records in the information age. A case study of the US Virgin Islands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  7. Bastian JA (2001) A question of custody. The colonial archives of the US Virgin Islands. Am Arch 64(1):96–114Google Scholar
  8. Bastian JA (2002) Taking custody, giving access. A postcustodial role for a new century. Archivaria 53:76–93Google Scholar
  9. Bastian JA (2003) Owning memory. How a Caribbean community lost its archives and found its history. Libraries Unlimited, WestportGoogle Scholar
  10. Belle LV (2018) I am Queen Mary. Artist talk and panel debate. National Gallery of Denmark, Copenhagen, 1 AprGoogle Scholar
  11. Browne S (2015) Black matters. On the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Caswell ML (2016) ‘The archive’ is not an archives. On acknowledging the intellectual contributions of archival studies. Reconstruction: studies in contemporary culture 16(1)Google Scholar
  13. Caswell ML, Cifor M (2016) From human rights to feminist ethics. Radical empathy in the archives. Archivaria 81:23–43Google Scholar
  14. Caswell ML, Punzalan R, Sangwand TK (2017) Critical archival studies. An introduction. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1(2)
  15. Collins PH (1995) Black women and motherhood. In: Held J (ed) Justice and care. Essential readings in feminist ethics. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 117–135Google Scholar
  16. Copeland H, Thompson K (2011) Perpetual returns. New World slavery and the matter of the visual. Representations 113:1–15Google Scholar
  17. Danbolt M, Wilson MK (2018) A monumental challenge to Danish history. Kunstkritik, 26 Apr. 25 Aug. 2018
  18. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, K, Agostinho D, Søilen KLG (2019) Archives that matter. Digital infrastructures for sharing unshared histories. Nordic J Inf Stud Cult Commun 8(3)Google Scholar
  19. Dize, N (2019) Feeling grief. On emotions in the archive of enslavement. Nursing Clio, 22 Jan. 17 Apr 2019
  20. Edwards E (2016) The colonial archival imaginaire at home. Social Anthropol Anthropologie Soc 24(1):52–66Google Scholar
  21. Foucault M (2004) The archaeology of knowledge. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Gikandi S (2015) Rethinking the archive of enslavement. Early Am Lit 50(1):81–102Google Scholar
  23. Graham H (1991) The concept of caring in feminist research. Sociology 25(1):61–78Google Scholar
  24. Graham M (2007) The ethics of care, black women and the social professions. Implications of a new analysis. Ethics Soc Welf 1(2):194–206. Google Scholar
  25. Harney S, Rogoff I (2015) How not to be accessed thusly. Seminar at Bergen Assembly. 1 Sep. 2018
  26. Hartman S (2008) Lose your mother. A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartman S (2011) Review of Delia’s tears: race, science, and photography in nineteenth-century America. J Am Hist 98(2):520–522Google Scholar
  28. Hartman S (2019) Wayward lives, beautiful experiments. Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Helton L, Leroy J, Mishler MA, Seeley S, Sweeney S (2015) The question of recovery. An introduction. Soc Text 33(4)
  30. Hooks B (1991) Yearning. Race, gender, and cultural politics. Turnaround, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen L (2018) Postcolonial Denmark. Nation narration in a crisis ridden Europe. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson JM (2018) Markup bodies. Black [life] studies and slavery [death] studies at the digital crossroads. Text 36(4):57–79Google Scholar
  33. Kelleher C (2017) Archives without archives. (Re)locating and (re)defining the archive through post-custodial praxis. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1(2)
  34. Körber LA (2018) Gold Coast (2015) and Danish economies of colonial guilt. J Aesthet Cult 10(2):25–37Google Scholar
  35. Lowe L (2015) The intimacies of four continents. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattson R (2016) Can we center an ethics of care in audiovisual archival practice? XFR Collective, 2 Dec. 18 Apr 2019
  37. Moore N (2012) The politics and ethics of naming. Questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 15(4):331–340Google Scholar
  38. Mooten N (2015) Toward a postcolonial ethics of care. Accessed 10 Apr. 2019
  39. Murphy M (2015) Unsettling care. Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Soc Stud Sci 45(5):717–737Google Scholar
  40. Narayan U (1995) Colonialism and its others. Considerations on rights and care discourses. Hypatia 10(2):133–140Google Scholar
  41. Navarro T (2017) From Danish west indies to American poorhouse. Small axe salon 26Google Scholar
  42. Odumosu T (2019) The crying baby. On colonial archives, digitisation, and ethics of care in the cultural commons. Paper presented at Malmö University, 27 FebGoogle Scholar
  43. Rigsarkivet (n.d.) The Danish West-Indies. Sources of history. Accessed 12 Apr. 2019
  44. Risam R (2018) New digital worlds. Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  45. Rowell CJ, Cooksey T (2019) Archive of hate. Ethics of care in the preservation of ugly histories. Lady Science, 9 Jan. Accessed 25 Feb 2019
  46. Samudzi Z (2019) Bots are terrible at recognizing Black faces. Let’s keep it that way. Daily Beast, 2 Febr 2019. Accessed 17 Apr 2019Google Scholar
  47. Silva DF (2009) No-bodies. Law, raciality and violence. Griffith Law Rev 18(2):212–236Google Scholar
  48. Spillers H (1987) Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe. An American grammar book. Diacritics 17(2):64–81Google Scholar
  49. Stoler AL (2002) Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Arch Sci 2:87–109Google Scholar
  50. Sutherland T (2017) Making a killing. On race, ritual, and (re)membering in digital culture. Preserv Digit Technol Cult 46(1):32–40Google Scholar
  51. Taylor D (2003) The archive and the repertoire. Performing cultural memory in the Americas. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  52. Ticktin MI (2011) Casualties of care. Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  53. Unsettling Minnesota (2009) Unsettling ourselves. Reflections and resources for deconstructing colonial mentality. Unsettling Minnesota, Minneapolis Accessed 17 Apr 2019
  54. Wekker G (2016) White Innocence. Paradoxes of colonialism and race. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  55. Wernimont J (2019) Numbered lives. Life and death in quantum media. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Arts and Cultural StudiesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations