Advertisement

Archival Science

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 87–116 | Cite as

Toward slow archives

  • Kimberly Christen
  • Jane AndersonEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This article examines the structures, practices, and processes of collection, cataloging, and curation to expose where current cultural authority is placed, valued, and organized within archival workflows. The long arc of collecting is not just rooted in colonial paradigms; it relies on and continually remakes those structures of injustice through the seemingly benign practices and processes of the profession. Our emphasis is on one mode of decolonizing processes that insist on a different temporal framework: the slow archives. Slowing down creates a necessary space for emphasizing how knowledge is produced, circulated, and exchanged through a series of relationships. Slowing down is about focusing differently, listening carefully, and acting ethically. It opens the possibility of seeing the intricate web of relationships formed and forged through attention to collaborative curation processes that do not default to normative structures of attribution, access, or scale.

Keywords

Ethical curation Indigenous collaborations Access Technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge that this work was carried out on the traditional homelands of the Palus Band of Indians, the ceded lands of the Nez Perce Tribe, the traditional territories of the Calusa Indians and on Lenapehoking, the homeland of the Lenape people. We further acknowledge their presence here since time immemorial and recognize continuing connection to the lands, waters, and ancestors. We would like to thank our colleagues and collaborators, James Francis, Donald Soctomah, Dwayne Tomah and Guha Shankar, for their time and dedication to this work. We also want to acknowledge the labor of our graduate student assistants, Jesslyn Starnes and Landon Roper. Their research was invaluable to this work. We would also like to acknowledge the generous support of the Rauschenberg Foundation.

References

  1. Adler M (2016) The case for taxonomic reparations. Knowl Org 43(8):630–640Google Scholar
  2. Adler M (2017) Cruising the library: perversities in the organization of knowledge. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman J, Hinkson M (2010) Culture crisis: anthropology and politics in aboriginal Australia. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  4. American Folk Life Center (AFLC) (2016) Collaborations, collections, and connections symposium. http://www.loc.gov/folklife/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
  5. Anderson J (2013) Anxieties of authorship in the colonial archive. In: Chris C, Gerstner DA (eds) Media authorship. Routledge, New York, pp 229–246Google Scholar
  6. Anderson J (2018) Negotiating who owns Penobscot culture. Anthr Quart 91(1):267–305Google Scholar
  7. Anderson J, Christen K (2013) Chuck a copyright on it: Dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels. Mus Anth Rev 7(1–2):105–126Google Scholar
  8. Anderson J, Christen K (in press) Decolonizing attribution: traditions of exclusion. J Radic LibrGoogle Scholar
  9. Bastian JA, Alexander B (2009) Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady E (1999) A spiral way: how the phonograph changed ethnography. University of Mississippi Press, JacksonGoogle Scholar
  11. Calloway C (2013) Pen and ink witchcraft: treaties and treaty making in American Indian history. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Caswell M (2014) Seeing yourself in history: community archives and the fight against symbolic annihilation. Pub Hist 36(4):26–37Google Scholar
  13. Caswell M (2016) The archive is not an archives: acknowledging the intellectual contributions of archival studies. Reconstr 16(1) https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk Accessed 5 Feb 2019
  14. Caswell M, Cifor M (2016) From human rights to feminist ethics: radical empathy in archives. Archivia 81:23–43Google Scholar
  15. Caswell M, Migoni AA, Geraci N, Marika C (2017a) To be able to imagine otherwise: community archives and the importance of representation. Arch Rec Assoc 38(1):5–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2016.1260445 Google Scholar
  16. Caswell M, Punzalan R, Sangwand T (2017b) Critical archive studies: an introduction. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50 Google Scholar
  17. Christen K (2011) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. Am Arch 74:185–210Google Scholar
  18. Christen K (2012) Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. Int J Commun 6:2870–2893Google Scholar
  19. Christen K (2018) Relationships not records: digital heritage and the ethics of sharing indigenous knowledge online. In: Sayers J (ed) Routledge companion to media studies and digital humanities. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 403–412Google Scholar
  20. Christen K, Merrill A, Wynne M (2017) A community of relations: Mukurtu hubs and spokes. D-Lib Mag 23(5–6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may17/christen/05christen.html. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
  21. Cifor M, Lee JA (2017) Towards an archival critique: opening possibilities for addressing neoliberalism in the archival field. J Crit Lib Inf St 1(1):1–22Google Scholar
  22. Cifor M, Caswell M, Migoni A, Geraci N (2018) What we do crosses over to activism: the politics and practice of community archives. Arch Pub Hist 40(2):69–95Google Scholar
  23. Clayton M (1996) Ethnographic wax cylinders at the British library national sound archive: a brief history and description of the collection. Br J Ethnomus 5:67–92Google Scholar
  24. Collaborations, collections, and connections symposium (2016) Transcription of question and answer panel. https://stream-media.loc.gov/webcasts/captions/2016/160913afc0900.txt. Accessed on 23 Aug 2018
  25. Cook T (2011) The archive(s) is a foreign country: historians, archives, and the changing archival landscape. Am Arch 74:600–632Google Scholar
  26. Cushman E (2013) Wampum, Sequoyan, and story: decolonizing the digital archive. Coll Eng 76(2):115–135Google Scholar
  27. Deloria PJ (2018) The new world of the indigenous museum. Daedalus 147(2):106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00494 Google Scholar
  28. Deloria PJ, Lomawaima KT, Brayboy BMKJ, Trahant MN, Ghiglione L, Medin D, Blackhawk N (2018) Unfolding futures: indigenous ways of knowing for the twenty-first century. Daedalus 147(2):6–16Google Scholar
  29. Dowd G (1992) A spirited resistance: the North American Indian struggle for unity, 1745–1815. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  30. Drake J (2016) Liberatory archives: towards belonging and believing. Medium. https://medium.com/on-archivy/liberatory-archives-towards-belonging-and-believing-part-2-6f56c754eb17. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
  31. Duarte M (2017) Network sovereignty: building the internet across Indian Country. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  32. Evans J, McKemmish S, Rolan G (2017) Critical archiving and recordkeeping research and practice in the continuum. Crit Arch Stud 1(2):1–38Google Scholar
  33. Falzetti AG (2014) Archival absence: the burden of history. Settl Col Stud 5(2):128–144Google Scholar
  34. Faulkhead S (2009) Connecting through records: narratives of Koorie Victoria. Arch Manuscr 37(2):60–88Google Scholar
  35. Fewkes JW (1890a) Archaeology and ethnology. Am Nat 24(281):495–496Google Scholar
  36. Fewkes JW (1890b) On the use of the phonograph in the study of the languages of American Indians. Science 15(378):267–269Google Scholar
  37. Fewkes JW (1890c) A contribution to Passamaquoddy folk-lore. J of Am Folk 3(11):257–280Google Scholar
  38. Fewkes JW (1890d) A trip to Calais Maine for the purpose of experimenting with phonograph as an instrument to preserve the ancient language of that tribe. Unpublished, FieldbookGoogle Scholar
  39. Fewkes JW (1924) Annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1920. Washington Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilliland AJ, McKemmish S (2014) The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. Atlanti 24:79–88Google Scholar
  41. Gitelman L (1999) Scripts, grooves and writing machines: representing technology in the Edison Era. Stanford University Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  42. Gitelman L (2006) Always already new: media, history and the data of culture. MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodyear-Ka‘ōpua N, Kuwada BK (2018) Making ‘Aha: independent Hawaiian pasts, presents, and futures. Daedalus 147(2):49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00489 Google Scholar
  44. Gray J (1988) The federal cylinder project: a guide to field cylinder collections in federal agencies. Library of Congress, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Greene M, Meissner D (2005) More product, less process: revamping traditional archival processing. Am Arch 68(2):208–263Google Scholar
  46. Hagan W (1978) Archival captive—the American Indian. Am Arch 41(2):135–142Google Scholar
  47. Haraway D (2016) Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke Univ Press, DukeGoogle Scholar
  48. Hennessy K, Lyons N, Loring S, Arnold C, Joe M, Elias A, Pokiak J (2013) The Inuvialuit living history project: digital return as the forging of relationships between institutions, people, and data. Mus Anth Rev 7(1–2):44–73Google Scholar
  49. Horseman R (1967) Expansion and American Indian policy, 1783–1812. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  50. Hudson DJ (2017) On “diversity” as anti-racism in library and information studies: a critique. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1:1–36Google Scholar
  51. Hughes-Watkins L (2018) Moving toward a reparative archive: a roadmap for a holistic approach to disrupting homogenous histories in academic repositories and creating inclusive spaces for marginalized voices. J Cont Arch Stud 5(1):1–17Google Scholar
  52. Iacovino L (2010) Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Arch Sci 10(4):353–372Google Scholar
  53. Jackson A (1830) Transcript of President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal. https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=25&page=transcript. Accessed on 23 Aug 2018
  54. Jules B (2017) Confronting our failure of care around the legacies of marginalized people in the archives. Medium. https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
  55. Kelleher C (2017) Archives without archives: (re)locating and (re)defining the archive through post-custodial praxis. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–30.  https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.29 Google Scholar
  56. Littletree S, Metoyer CA (2015) Knowledge organization from an indigenous perspective: the mashantucket pequot thesaurus of American Indian terminology project. Cat Classif Q 53(5–6):640–657.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1010113 Google Scholar
  57. Local Contexts (2018). http://localcontexts.org/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
  58. Lonetree A (2012) Decolonizing museums: representing Native American in national and tribal museums. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  59. McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Iacovino LM, Thorpe K (2010) Australian indigenous knowledge and the archives: embracing multiple ways of knowing and keeping. Arch Manuscr 38(1):27–50Google Scholar
  60. McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L (2011) Distrust in the archives: reconciling records. Arch Sci 11(3–4):211–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2 Google Scholar
  61. Mignolo W (2000) Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledge and border thinking. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  62. Mukurtu CMS (2018). http://mukurtu.org/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
  63. Noble S (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism?. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Neal JR (2015) The right to know: decolonizing Native American archives. J West Arch 6(1):1–19Google Scholar
  65. O’Neal JR (2014) Respect, recognition, and reciprocity: the protocols for Native American archival materials. In: Daniel D, Levi A (eds) Identity palimpsests: archiving ethnicity in the US and Canada. Litwin, Sacramento, pp 125–142Google Scholar
  66. Owens H (1998) Mapping beyond Dewey’s boundaries: constructing classificatory space for marginalized knowledge domains. Lib Trends 47(2):233–255Google Scholar
  67. Passamaquoddy People (2018). http://passamaquoddypeople.com/. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
  68. Perche D (2017) Ten years on, it’s time we learned the lessons from the failed Northern territory intervention: the conversation. http://theconversation.com/ten-years-on-its-time-we-learned-the-lessons-from-the-failed-northern-territory-intervention-79198. Access 23 Aug 2018
  69. Powell JW (1881) First annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1879–1880. Washington Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  70. Racette SF (2016) Pieces left along the trail: material culture histories and indigenous studies. In: Anderson C, O’Brien JM (eds) Sources and methods in indigenous studies. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  71. Ramirez MH (2015) Being assumed not to be: a critique of whiteness as an archival imperative. Am Arch 78(2):339–356Google Scholar
  72. Rifkin M (2017) Beyond settler time: temporal sovereignty and indigenous self-determination. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  73. Riley AR, Carpenter KA (2016) Owning Red: a theory of Indian (cultural) appropriation. Tex Law Rev 94:859–931Google Scholar
  74. Roy L, Bhasin A, Arriaga SK (2011) Tribal libraries, archives, and museums: preserving our language, memory, and lifeways. Scarecrow Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  75. Russell L (2006) Indigenous records and archives: mutual obligations and building trust. Arch Manuscr 34(1):32–43Google Scholar
  76. Sangwand T (2014) Human rights archiving: from postcustodial theory to praxis. Arch Outlook (July/Aug):10–12Google Scholar
  77. Sangwand T (2018) Preservation is political: enacting contributive justice and decolonizing transnational archival collaborations. KULA 2(1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.36 Google Scholar
  78. Schwartz J, Cook T (2002) Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory. Arch Sci 2:1–19Google Scholar
  79. Simpson A (2014) Mohawk interruptus: political life across the borders of settler states. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  80. Simpson A (2016) Whither settler colonialism? Settl Colon Stud 4(4):438–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2015.1124427 Google Scholar
  81. Soctomah D (2018) Passamaquoddy Peoples’ welcome message. http://passamaquoddypeople.com/about. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
  82. Sutherland T (2017) Archival amnesty: in search of Black American transitional restorative justice. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–23.  https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42 Google Scholar
  83. Te Punga Somerville AA (2017) I do still have a letter: our sea of archives. In: Anderson C, O’Brien JM (eds) Sources and methods in Indigenous studies. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  84. Thorp J (2019) Thirty-one cylinders. Artist in the archive podcast. Episode 8. https://artistinthearchive.podbean.com/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019
  85. Thorpe K (2014) Indigenous records: connecting, critiquing and diversifying collections. Arch Manuscr 42(2):211–214Google Scholar
  86. Thorpe K (2017) Aboriginal community archives: a case study in ethical community research. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  87. Trigger B, Washburn W (1996) The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas, Vol 1 North America, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  88. Tuck E, Yang K (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization 1:1–20Google Scholar
  89. Tuck E, Yang W (2014) Unbecoming claims: pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qual Inq 6:811–818Google Scholar
  90. Vizenor G (ed) (2008) Survivance: narratives of native presence. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  91. Washburn WE (1975) The assault on Indian tribalism: the general allotment law (Dawes Act) of 1887. JB Lippincott Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations