Advertisement

Aquaculture International

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1599–1612 | Cite as

Effects of stocking density on stress response, innate immune parameters, and welfare of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

  • Baoliang LiuEmail author
  • Fan Fei
  • Xiaotian Li
  • Xinyi Wang
  • Bin HuangEmail author
Article
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the growth performance, stress and immune responses, and welfare of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) under three different densities (initial density 9.3, 13.6, and 19.1 kg m−2) for 120 days in a recirculating aquaculture system. Turbot were measured every 20 days to evaluate growth biometrically and sampled every month to measure biochemical parameters and mRNA levels of some stress-related genes. No significant differences were detected in the parameters and gene expression among density groups until the final sampling, except Fulton’s condition factor, lysozyme, immunoglobulin M, and complement C3. At the end of the experiment (final density 26.11, 38.22, and 52.25 kg m−2), turbot reared in the high-density (HD) group had lower body mass increase, specific growth rate, and Fulton’s condition factor, as well as higher feed conversion ratio and coefficient of variation for weight than those reared in the low-density (LD) group (P < 0.05). Fish in the HD group had higher serum cortisol, glucose, lactate, and cholesterol levels than fish in the other groups, whereas they had lower lysozyme, immunoglobulin M, and complement C3 and C4 contents (P < 0.05). Fish reared in the HD group also had higher serum chloride and osmolality levels and higher sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Na+,K+-ATPase) activity and higher Na+,K+-ATPase gene expression levels in gills compared to the other groups (P < 0.05). The mRNA levels of cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A) and heat-shock proteins 70 and 90 (HSP70 and HSP90) were significantly upregulated, whereas glutathione S-transferase (GST) mRNA levels were significantly downregulated in the head kidney of fish in the HD group relative to fish in the other groups at the end of this trial (P < 0.05). These results indicated that overly high stocking (~50 kg m−2) density can negatively affect the growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, osmolality levels, stress-related gene expression, and overall welfare of turbot.

Keywords

Crowding stress Growth performance Immune and physiological parameters Welfare Scophthalmus maximus 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2017YFD0701701), the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2017HYZD04), and the Modern Agriculture Industry System Construction of Special Funds (CARS-47-G24).

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the guidelines and ethical standards of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Aksungur N, Aksungur M, Akbulut B, Kutlu I (2007) Effects of stocking density on growth performance survival and food conversion ratio of turbot (Psetta maxima) in the net cages on the southeastern coast of the Black Sea. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 7:147–152Google Scholar
  2. Alak G, Yeltekin AÇ, Taş IH, Ucar A, Parlak V, Topal A, Kocaman EM, Atamanalp M (2017) Investigation of 8-OHdG, CYP1A, HSP70 and transcriptional analyses of antioxidant defence system in liver tissues of rainbow trout exposed to eprinomectin. Fish Shellfish Immunol 65:136–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arockiaraj J, Gnanam AJ, Palanisamy R, Bhatt P, Kumaresan V, Chaurasia MK, Pasupuleti M, Ramaswamy H, Arasu A, Sathyamoorthi A (2014) A cytosolic glutathione s-transferase, GST-theta from freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii: molecular and biochemical properties. Gene 546:437–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer A, Schulz C, Traulsen I, Krieter J (2011) Analysing the growth of turbot (Psetta maxima) in a commercial recirculation system with the use of three different growth models. Aquacult Int 19:497–511Google Scholar
  5. Björnsson B, Steinarsson A, Oddgeirsson M, Ólafsdóttir SR (2012) Optimal stocking density of juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) reared in a land-based farm. Aquaculture s356-357:342–350Google Scholar
  6. Conte FS (2004) Stress and the welfare of cultured fish. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86:205–223Google Scholar
  7. Costas B, Aragão C, Mancera JM, Dinis MT, Conceição LEC (2008) High stocking density induces crowding stress and affects amino acid metabolism in Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis (Kaup 1858) juveniles. Aquac Res 39:1–9Google Scholar
  8. Costas B, Aragão C, Dias J, Afonso A, Conceição LEC (2013) Interactive effects of a high-quality protein diet and high stocking density on the stress response and some innate immune parameters of Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis. Fish Physiol Biochem 39:1141–1151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis TE, Bulger AJ (1995) Condition factor and whole-body sodium concentrations in a freshwater fish: evidence for acidification stress and possible ionoregulatory over-compensation. Water Air Soil Pollut 85:377–382Google Scholar
  10. Di Marco P, Priori A, Finoia MG, Massari A, Mandich A, Marino G (2008) Physiological responses of European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax to different stocking densities and acute stress challenge. Aquaculture 275:319–328Google Scholar
  11. Diesen Hosfeld C, Hammer J, Handeland SO, Fivelstad S, Stefansson SO (2009) Effects of fish density on growth and smoltification in intensive production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 294:236–241Google Scholar
  12. Ellis T, North B, Scott AP, Bromage NR, Porter M, Gadd D (2010) The relationships between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 61:493–531Google Scholar
  13. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2008) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare on a request from the European Commission on the Animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed trout. EFSA J 796:1–22Google Scholar
  14. FAO (2018) FAO yearbook. Fishery and aquaculture statistics 2016. RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia F, Romera DM, Gozi KS, Onaka EM, Fonseca FS, Schalch SHC, Candeira PG, Guerra LOM, Carmo FJ, Carneiro DJ, Martins MIEG, Portella MC (2013) Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir. Aquaculture 410-411:51–56Google Scholar
  16. Gornati R, Papis E, Rimoldi S, Terova G, Saroglia M, Bernardini G (2004) Rearing density influences the expression of stress-related genes in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.). Gene 341:111–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera M, Vargas-Chacoff L, Hachero I, Ruiz-Jarabo I, Rodiles A, Navas JI, Mancera JM (2009) Physiological responses of juvenile wedge sole Dicologoglossa cuneata (Moreau) to high stocking density. Aquac Res 40:790–797Google Scholar
  18. Hwang HK, Son MH, Myeong JI, Kim CW, Min BH (2014) Effects of stocking density on the cage culture of Korean rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli). Aquaculture 434:303–306Google Scholar
  19. Iguchi K, Ogawa K, Nagae M, Ito F (2003) The influence of rearing density on stress response and disease susceptibility of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Aquaculture 220:515–523Google Scholar
  20. Irwin S, O'Halloran J, FitzGerald RD (1999) Stocking density, growth and growth variation in juvenile turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (Rafinesque). Aquaculture 178:77–88Google Scholar
  21. Iwama GK (2007) The welfare of fish. Dis Aquat Org 75:155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jia R, Liu BL, Han C, Huang B, Lei JL (2016) Influence of stocking density on growth performance, antioxidant status, and physiological response of juvenile turbot, Scophthalmus maximu, reared in land-based recirculating aquaculture system. J World Aquacult Soc 47:587–599Google Scholar
  23. Larsen BK, Skov PV, McKenzie DJ, Jokumsen A (2012) The effects of stocking density and low level sustained exercise on the energetic efficiency of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared at 19 °C. Aquaculture 324-325:226–233Google Scholar
  24. Lei JL, Liu XF (2010) Culture of turbot: chinese perspective. In: Daniels HV, Watanabe WO (eds) Practical flatfish culture and stock enhancement. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, pp 185–202Google Scholar
  25. Li X, Liu Y, Blancheton JP (2013) Effect of stocking density on performances of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in recirculating aquaculture systems. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 31:514–522Google Scholar
  26. Liu B, Liu Y, Wang X (2015) The effect of stocking density on growth and seven physiological parameters with assessment of their potential as stress response indicators for the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 48:177–192Google Scholar
  27. Liu B, Jia R, Zhao K, Wang G, Lei J, Huang B (2017a) Stocking density effects on growth and stress response of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) reared in land-based recirculating aquaculture system. Acta Oceanol Sin 36:31–38Google Scholar
  28. Liu B, Liu Y, Sun G (2017b) Effects of stocking density on growth performance and welfare-related physiological parameters of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in recirculating aquaculture system. Aquac Res 48:2133–2144Google Scholar
  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lupatsch I, Santos GA, Schrama JW, Verreth JAJ (2010) Effect of stocking density and feeding level on energy expenditure and stress responsiveness in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture 298:245–250Google Scholar
  31. Magnadóttir B (2006) Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol 20:137–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Magnadóttir B (2010) Immunological control of fish diseases. Mar Biotechnol 12:361–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazur CF, Iwama GK (1993) Handling and crowding stress reduces number of plaque-forming cells in Atlantic salmon. J Aquat Anim Health 5:98–101Google Scholar
  34. McCormick SD (2001) Endocrine control of osmoregulation in teleost fish. Am Zool 41:781–794Google Scholar
  35. Merino GE, Piedrahita RH, Conklin DE (2007) The effect of fish stocking density on the growth of California halibut (Paralichthys californicus) juveniles. Aquaculture 265:176–186Google Scholar
  36. Montero D, Izquierdo MS, Tort L, Robaina L, Vergara JM (1999) High stocking density produces crowding stress altering some physiological and biochemical parameters in gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, juveniles. Fish Physiol Biochem 20:53–60Google Scholar
  37. Ni M, Wen H, Li J, Chi M, Bu Y, Ren Y, Zhang M, Song Z, Ding H (2014) The physiological performance and immune responses of juvenile Amur sturgeon (Acipenser schrenckii) to stocking density and hypoxia stress. Fish Shellfish Immunol 36:325–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. North BP, Turnbull JF, Ellis T, Porter MJ, Migaud H, Bron J, Bromage NR (2006) The impact of stocking density on the welfare of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 255:466–479Google Scholar
  39. Oppedal F, Vågseth T, Dempster T, Juell JE, Johansson D (2011) Fluctuating sea-cage environments modify the effects of stocking densities on production and welfare parameters of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 315:361–368Google Scholar
  40. Ortuno J, Esteban MA, Meseguer J (2001) Effects of short-term crowding stress on the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L) innate immune response. Fish Shellfish Immunol 11:187–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Person-Le Ruyet J, Baudin-Laurencin F, Devauchelle N, Me’tailler R, Nicolas JL, Robin J, Guillaume J (1991) Culture of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). In: McVey JP (ed) CRC Handbook of mariculture, Vol. II: Finfish aquaculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 21–41Google Scholar
  42. Pottinger TG (2010) Changes in blood cortisol, glucose and lactate in carp retained in anglers’ keepnets. J Fish Biol 53:728–742Google Scholar
  43. Roberts RJ, Agius C, Saliba C, Bossier P, Sung YY (2010) Heat shock proteins (chaperones) in fish and shellfish and their potential role in relation to fish health: a review. J Fish Dis 33:789–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruane NM, Carballo EC, Komen J (2002) Increased stocking density influences the acute physiological stress response of common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.). Aquac Res 33:777–784Google Scholar
  45. Sadhu N, Sharma SK, Joseph S, Dube P, Philipose K (2014) Chronic stress due to high stocking density in open sea cage farming induces variation in biochemical and immunological functions in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer, Bloch). Fish Physiol Biochem 40:1105–1113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Salas-Leiton E, Anguis V, Martín-Antonio B, Crespo D, Planas JV, Infante C, Cañavate JP, Manchado M (2010) Effects of stocking density and feed ration on growth and gene expression in the Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis): potential effects on the immune response. Fish Shellfish Immunol 28:296–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sánchez P, Ambrosio PP, Flos R (2013) Stocking density affects Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis, Kaup) growth independently of size dispersion, evaluated using an individual photo-identification technique. Aquac Res 44:231–241Google Scholar
  48. Segner H, Sundh H, Buchmann K, Douxfils J, Sundell KS, Mathieu C, Ruane N, Jutfelt F, Toften H, Vaughan L (2012) Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator. Fish Physiol Biochem 38:85–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. van de Nieuwegiessen PG, Olwo J, Khong S, Verreth JAJ, Schrama JW (2009) Effects of age and stocking density on the welfare of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus Burchell. Aquaculture 288:69–75Google Scholar
  50. Vargas-Chacoff L, Calvo Á, Ruiz-Jarabo I, Villarroel F, Muñoz JL, Tinoco AB, Cárdenas S, Mancera JM (2011) Growth performance, osmoregulatory and metabolic modifications in red porgy fry, Pagrus pagrus, under different environmental salinities and stocking densities. Aquac Res 42:1269–1278Google Scholar
  51. Vargas-Chacoff L, Martínez D, Oyarzún R, Nualart D, Olavarría V, Yáñez A, Bertrán C, Ruiz-Jarabo I, Mancera JM (2014) Combined effects of high stocking density and Piscirickettsia salmonis treatment on the immune system, metabolism and osmoregulatory responses of the sub-Antarctic Notothenioid fish Eleginops maclovinus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 40:424–434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagner EJ, Intelmann SS, Routledge MD (2010) The effects of fry rearing density on hatchery performance, fin condition, and agonistic behavior of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss fry. J World Aquacult Soc 27:264–274Google Scholar
  53. Wenderlaar Bonga SE (1997) The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 77:591–625Google Scholar
  54. Yarahmadi P, Miandare HK, Hoseinifar SH, Gheysvandi N, Akbarzadeh A (2014) The effects of stocking density on hemato-immunological and serum biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac Int 23:55–63Google Scholar
  55. Yarahmadi P, Miandare HK, Fayaz S, Caipang CMA (2016) Increased stocking density causes changes in expression of selected stress- and immune-related genes, humoral innate immune parameters and stress responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol 48:43–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zapata A, Diez B, Cejalvo T, Gutierrez-de Frias C, Cortes A (2006) Ontogeny of the immune system of fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol 20:126–136PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research InstituteChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production ProcessesQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Dalian Ocean UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations