Advertisement

Behavior and physiological status of pond-cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) broodstock effected by sexual interactions throughout semi-artificial reproduction

  • Malinovskyi OleksandrEmail author
  • Kolářová Jitka
  • Blecha Miroslav
  • Stará Alžběta
  • Velíšek Josef
  • Křišťan Jiří
  • Policar Tomáš
European Percid Fish Culture
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated physiological and behavioral responses of pikeperch broodstock related to sexual interactions under controlled conditions throughout semi-artificial reproduction. Blood samples taken from pond-cultured pikeperch broodstock were analyzed to assess the stress response at different stages of semi-artificial reproduction protocol. Sampling was performed as follows: before hormonal induction (control), 24 h (SP24) and 48 h (SP48) after spawning when males and females were separated, and 24 h (NS24) and 48 h (NS48) after spawning when males and females were kept together. The separation immediately after spawning had a significant effect on physiological state of broodstock. Separation affected indices of erythrocyte count, hematocrit (packed cell volume, PCV), glucose (GLU), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in females and levels of lactate and leukocytes in males. Monitoring of pikeperch behavior in groups NS24 and NS48 revealed the strong aggressive paternal behavior of male to females. Attacks mainly targeted the caudal fin and resulted in female mortality in group NS48.

Keywords

Aquaculture Blood analyzing Ecology Management Mortality Spawning 

Notes

Funding information

The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (projects CENAKVA [No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024] and Biodiversity [No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007370]) and by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (project NAZV QK1710310).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethic statement

The study performed and the experimental broodstock handled were in accordance with national and international guidelines for the protection of animal welfare (EU-harmonized Animal Welfare Act of the Czech Republic). The experimental unit is licensed (No. 2293/2015-MZE-17214 and No. 55187/2016-MZE-17214 within the project NAZV QK1710310) according to the Czech National Directive (the Law against Animal Cruelty, No. 246/1992).

References

  1. Adámek Z, Kortan J, Flajšhans M (2007) Computer-assisted image analysis in the evaluation of fish wounding by cormorant [Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis (L.)]. Aquacult Int 15:211–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9087-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen CY (2002) Possible new mechanism of cortisol action in female reproductive organs: physiological implications of the free hormone hypothesis. J Endocrinol 173:211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1730211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baekelandt S, Mandiki SNM, Schmitz M, Kestemont P (2019) Influence of the light spectrum on the daily rhythms of stress and humoral innate immune markers in pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture 499:358–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blecha M, Kristan J, Samarin AM, Rodina M, Policar T (2015) Quality and quantity of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) spermatozoa after varying cold water treatments. J Appl Ichthyol 31 (Suppl. 2:75–78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blecha M, Samarin AM, Kristan J et al (2016) Benefits of hormone treatment of both sexes in semi-artificial reproduction of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.). Czech J Anim Sci 61:203–208.  https://doi.org/10.17221/60/2015-CJAS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowden TJ (2008) Modulation of the immune system of fish by their environment. Fish Shellfish Immunol 25:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bry C (1985) Plasma cortisol levels of female rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) at the end of the reproductive cycle: relationship with oocyte stages. Gen Comp Endocrinol 57:47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(85)90199-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook AF, Stacey NE, Peter RE (1980) Periovulatory changes in serum cortisol levels in the goldfish, Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 40:507–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(80)90015-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drasovean AG, Blidariu FC (2013) The naturally conducted reproductive behavior of Sander lucioperca L. Bull UASVM Anim Sci Biotechnol 70(2):255–262Google Scholar
  10. Espelid S, Lokken GB, Steiro K, Bogwald J (1996) Effects of cortisol and stress on the immune system in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Fish Shellfish Immunol 6:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falahatkar B, Poursaeid S (2014) Effects of hormonal manipulation on stress responses in male and female broodstocks of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquac Int 22:235–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9678-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falahatkar B, Akhavan S, Efatpanah I, Meknatkhah B (2012) Primary and secondary responses of juveniles of a teleostean, pikeperch Sander lucioperca, and a chondrostean, Persian sturgeon Acipenser persicus, to handling during transport. N Am J Aquac 74:241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2012.675988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falahatkar B, Eslamloo K, Yokoyama S (2014) Suppression of stress responses in Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baeri, juveniles by the dietary administration of bovine lactoferrin. J World Aquacult Soc 45:699–708.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faught E, Vijayan MM (2018) Maternal stress and fish reproduction: the role of cortisol revisited. Fish Fish 19(6):1016–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontaine P, Legendre M, Vandeputte M, Fostier A (2009) Domestication of new species and sustainable development in fish culture. Cah Agric 18:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2009.0293 Google Scholar
  16. Fontaine P, Wang N, Hermelink B (2015) Chapter 3: Broodstock management and control of the reproduction cycle. In: Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and culture of percid fishes—principles and practices. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7227-3_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghosh AK, Joshi SR (2008) Disorders of calcium, phosphorus and magnesium metabolism. J Assoc Physicians India 56:613–621Google Scholar
  18. Gomułka P, Kucharczyk D, Szczerbowski A et al (2007) Chapter 9: Artificial pikeperch propagation—veterinary purposes. In: Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (eds) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Mercurius Olsztyn, Poland, pp 67–74Google Scholar
  19. Gomułka P, Dagowski J, Wlasow T et al (2015) Haematological and biochemical blood profile in Russian sturgeon following propofol and eugenol anesthesia. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 15:13–17.  https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v15_1_02 Google Scholar
  20. Grozea A, Drasovean A, Lalescu D et al (2016) The pike perch (Sander lucioperca) background color first choice in the recirculating aquaculture systems. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 16:891–897.  https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v16_4_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huse I, Skiftesvik AB (1990) A pc-aided video based system for behavior observation of fish larvae and small aquatic invertebrates. Aquac Eng 9:131–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8609(90)90016-S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kestemont P, Henrotte E (2015) Chapter 20: Nutritional requirements and feeding of broodstock and early life stages of Eurasian perch and pikeperch. In: Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and culture of percid fishes—principles and practices. Springer, New York, pp 539–564.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7227-3_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khendek A, Chakraborty A, Roche J, Ledoré Y, Personne A, Policar T, Żarski D, Mandiki R, Kestemont P, Milla S, Fontaine P (2018) Rearing conditions and life history influence the progress of gametogenesis and reproduction performances in pikeperch males and females. Animal 12:2335–2346.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118000010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kime DE, Dolben IP (1985) Hormonal changes during induces ovulation of the carp Cyprinus carpio. Gen Comp Endocrinol 58:137–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(85)90147-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolářová J, Velíšek J (2012) Determination and assessment of biochemical profile of fish blood. FFPW Vodnany, edition of practical handbooks, USB FFPW 135, 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Křišťan J, Stejskal V, Policar T (2012) Comparison of reproduction characteristics and broodstock mortality in farmed and wild Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) females during reproduction under controlled conditions. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 12:191–197.  https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v12_2_01 Google Scholar
  27. Křišťan J, Alavi SMH, Stejskal V et al (2013) Hormonal induction of ovulation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and mammalian GnRH without dopamine inhibitor. Aquac Int 21:811–818.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9572-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Křišťan J, Stara A, Polgesek M et al (2014) Efficiency of different anesthetics for pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) in relation to water temperature. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 35 (Suppl. 2:81–85Google Scholar
  29. Křišťan J, Zarski D, Blecha M et al (2018) Fertilizing ability of gametes at different post-activation times and the sperm-oocyte-ratio in the artificial reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquac Res 49:1383–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuklina I, Ložek F, Císař P, Kouba A, Kozák P (2018) Crayfish can distinguish between natural and chemical stimuli as assessed by cardiac and locomotor reactions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(9):8396–8403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1183-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kusakabe M, Nakamura I, Young G (2003) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase complementary deoxyribonucleic acid in rainbow trout: cloning, sites of expression, and seasonal changes in gonads. Endocrinology 144:2534–2545.  https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2002-220446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lappalainen J, Dörner H, Wysujack K (2003) Reproductive biology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.)—a review. Ecol Freshw Fish 12:95–106.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00005.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lepič P, Stara A, Turek J et al (2014) The effects of four anaesthetics on haematological and blood biochemical profiles in vimba bream, Vimba vimba. Vet Med 59:81–87.  https://doi.org/10.17221/7317-VETMED CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ljubobratović U, Péter G, Horváth Z, Żarski D, Ristović T, Percze V, Sándor Z, Lengyel S, Rónyai A (2017) Reproductive performance of indoor-reared pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) females after wintering in outdoor earthen ponds. Aquac Res 48:4851–4863.  https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas MC, Baras E (2000) Methods for studying spatial behavior of freshwater fishes in the natural environment. Fish Fish 4:283–316.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00028.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Łuczyński J, Szkudlarek M, Szczerbowski A et al (2007) Chapter 3: Spawners and handling. In: Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (eds) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Mercurius Olsztyn, Poland, pp 17–22Google Scholar
  37. Malinovskyi O, Veselý L, Blecha M, Křišťan J, Policar T (2018) The substrate selection and spawning behavior of pikeperch Sander lucioperca L. broodstock under pond conditions. Aquac Res 49:3541–3547.  https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milla S, Wang N, Mandiki SNM, Kestemont P (2009) Corticosteroids: friends or foes of teleost fish reproduction? Comp Biochem Physiol A 153:242–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muller-Belecke A, Zienert S (2008) Out-of-season spawning of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) without the need of hormonal treatments. Aquacult Res 39:1279–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01991.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakayasu C, Youshinaga T, Kumagai A (2002) Hematology of anemia experimentally induced by repeated bleedings in Japanese flounder with comments on the cause of flounder anemia recently prevailing in Japan. Fish Pathol 37(3):125–130.  https://doi.org/10.3147/jsfp.37.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noaksson E, Linderoth M, Gustavsson B et al (2005) Reproductive status in female perch (Perca fluviatilis) outside a sewage treatment plant processing leachate from a refuse dump. Sci Total Environ 340:97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Omlin T, Weber JM (2010) Hypoxia stimulates lactate disposal in rainbow trout. J Exp Biol 213:3802–3809.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.048512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Papadakis VM, Papadakis IE, Lamprianidou F, Glaropoulos A, Kentouri M (2012) A computer-vision system and methodology for the analysis of fish behavior. Aquacult Eng 46:53–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pickering AD, Christie P (1981) Changes in the concentrations of plasma cortisol and thyroxine during sexual maturation of the hatchery-reared brown trout, Salmo trutta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 44:488–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(81)90337-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Policar T, Blecha M, Křišťan J, Mráz J, Velíšek J, Stará A, Stejskal V, Malinovskyi O, Svačina P, Samarin AM (2016) Comparison of production efficiency and quality of differently cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) juveniles as a valuable product for ongrowing culture. Aquac Int 24:1607–1626.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0050-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Policar T, Malinovskyi O, Křišťan J, Stejskal V, Samarin AM (2019) Post-spawning bath treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality of pond-cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) broodstock. Aquac IntGoogle Scholar
  47. Rónyai A (2007) Induced out-of-season and seasonal tank spawning and stripping of pike perch (Sander lucioperca L.). Aquac Res 38:1144–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01778.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Samarin AM, Blecha M, Bytyutskyy D, Policar T (2015) Post-ovulatory oocyte ageing in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) and its effect on egg viability rates and the occurrence of larval malformations and ploidy anomalies. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 15:435–441.  https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarameh S, Falahatkar B, Takami GA, Efatpanah I (2012) Effects of different photoperiods and handling stress on spawning and reproductive performance of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Anim Reprod Sci 132:213–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.011
  50. Sarameh SP, Falahatkar B, Takami GA et al (2013) Physiological changes in male and female pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) subjected to different photoperiods and handling stress during the reproductive season. Fish Physiol Biochem 39:1253–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-013-9780-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schreck CB (2010) Stress and fish reproduction: the roles of allostasis and hormesis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 165:549–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schreck CB, Contreras-Sanchez W, Fitzpatrick MS (2001) Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 197:3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00580-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steen R, Ski S (2014) Video-surveillance system for remote long-term in situ observations: recording diel cavity use and behavior of wild European lobsters (Homarus gammarus). Mar Freshw Res 65(12):1094–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF13139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stejskal V, Policar T, Křišťan J, Kouřil J, Hamáčková J (2011) Fin condition in intensively cultured Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.). Folia Zool 60(2):122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Svačina P, Priborsky J, Blecha M et al (2016) Haematological and biochemical response of burbot (Lota lota L.) exposed to four different anesthetics. Czech J Anim Sci 61(9):414–420.  https://doi.org/10.17221/14/2016-CJAS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Svobodova Z, Pravda D, Modra H (2012) Methods of haematological examination of fish. Edition of practical handbooks, USB FFPW 122, 38 sGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas PM, Pankhurst NW, Bremner HA (1999) The effect of stress and exercise on post-mortem biochemistry of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 54:1177–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb02047.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Westring CG, Ando H, Kitahashi T, Bhandari RK, Ueda H, Urano A, Dores RM, Sher AA, Danielson PB (2008) Seasonal changes in CRF-I and urotensin I transcript levels in masu salmon: correlation with cortisol secretion during spawning. Gen Comp Endocrinol 155:126–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Witeska M (2015) Anemia in teleost fishes. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 35(4)Google Scholar
  60. Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2009) Controlled reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.): a review. Arch Pol Fish 17:153–170.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-009-0014-z Google Scholar
  61. Zakęś Z, Szczepkowski M, Partyka K, Wunderlich K (2013) Effect of gonadotropin hormonal stimulation on out-of-season propagation success of different year classes of indoor-reared pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)). Aquac Int 21:801–810.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of HydrocenosesUniversity of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceVodňanyCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations