Modeling re-oxygenation performance of fine-bubble–diffusing aeration system in aquaculture ponds
Fine-bubble-diffusing (FBD) aeration system is widely used in aquaculture ponds. To maximize its re-oxygenation capability, it is needed to have a quantitative understanding of the reoxygenation performance. In practice, two indexes, namely oxygen volume mass transfer coefficient (KLa) and standard oxygen transfer efficiency (E), are commonly used to measure the re-oxygenation performance. However, few mathematical models are available to accurately predict these two indexes. The objective of this regard was to develop such a model driven by commonly available data. In this regard, the results from 54 group laboratory tests were regressed on four independent variables, including air flow rate (Qg), aeration tube length (L), submerged water depth of the diffuser (hd), and plane-view tank area (Acs). The regression revealed that both KLa and E are negatively related to hd and Acs, but they are positively related to L. In addition, KLa was found to be positively related to Qg, whereas E was found to be negatively related to Qg. Two regression models, one for KLa while another for E, are expected to be effective tools for operating FBD aeration system in practice to maximize its re-oxygenation capability though they may need to be further verified using field data.
KeywordsPrediction model Oxygen volume mass transfer Oxygen utilization rate Fine-bubble diffusing system Aquaculture
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51579106), the China Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (no. CARS-46-17), the National Key Technology R&D Program (no. 2012BAD25B04), and the Open Research Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Al-Ahmady KK (2006) Effect of airflow rate and submergence of diffusers on oxygen transfer capacity of diffused aeration systems. Al Rafdain Eng 14:27–38Google Scholar
- Al-Ahmady KK (2011) Mathematical model for calculating oxygen mass transfer coefficient in diffused air systems. Al-Rafdain Eng 19(4):43–54Google Scholar
- Azbel D (2009) Two-phase flows in chemical engineering. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Bayramoàlu M, Çakici A, Tekin T (2000) Modeling of oxygen transfer rate in diffused-air aeration tanks. Inst Chem Eng 78:209–212Google Scholar
- Boyd CE, Hanson T (2010) Dissolved-oxygen concentrations in pond aquaculture. Global Aquaculture Alliance 40–41Google Scholar
- Boyle W, Craven A, Danely W, Riech M (1996) Oxygen transfer study at the Madison metropolitan sewerage district facilities. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of research and Division, US EPA, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
- Calderbank PH, Moo-Young MB, Bibby R (1964) Coalescence in bubble reactors and absorbers. Chem Eng Sci 91–113Google Scholar
- Casy T (2009) Diffused air aeration systems for the activated sludge process. Technical Report, Aquaverrra Research PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- Cheng X, Xie J, Yu D (2013) Calculated analysis of oxygen transfer from air bubble-water interface and turbulent water surface in microporous aeration system. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29(13):190–199 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Cheng X, Zeng Y, Xie J (2014) Impact of microporous aeration flow and aeration tube length on oxygen transfer performance in water. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 30(22):209–217 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Deronzier G, Gillot S, Duchène PH, Héduit A (1996) Influence de la vitessehorizontale du fluidesur le transfertd’oxygène en fines bullesdans les bassinsd’aération. Tribune de l’Eau 91–97Google Scholar
- Deswal S (2011) Modeling oxygen-transfer by multiple plunging jets using support vector machines and Gaussian process regression techniques. Int J Civ Environ Eng 3(1):28–33Google Scholar
- Dold P, Fairlamb M (2001) Estimating oxygen transfer K La, SOTE, and air flow requirements in fine bubble diffused air systems. In: Proceedings of the water environment federation, Water Environment Federation, WEFTECGoogle Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) (1989) Design manual: Fine pore aeration systems. Risk reduction Engineering Laboratory, Center of Research and Development, US EPA, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
- Gillot S, Héduit A (2000) Effect of air flow rate on oxygen transfer in an oxidation ditch equipped with fine bubble diffusers and slow speed mixers. Water Resour 34(5):1756–1762Google Scholar
- Gillot S, Héduit A (2003) Predicting oxygen transfer in annular ditches equipped with fine bubble diffusers. In: Proceedings of the water environment federation, Annual WEF conference and exposition, Los Angeles, USA, pp 719–728Google Scholar
- Gillot S, Capela-Marsal S, Roustan M, Heduit A (2005) Predicting oxygen transfer of fine bubble diffused aeration systems—model issued from dimensional analysis. Water Resour 39:1379–1387Google Scholar
- Huibregtse GL, Rooney TC, Rasmussen DC (1983) Factors affecting fine bubble diffused aeration. Water Pollut Control Fed 55(8):1057–1064Google Scholar
- Li E (2007) Theory of optimal bubble group for fine bubble aeration and its application to reaeration engineering. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, pp 1–104 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Metcalf and Eddy (2002) Wastewater engineering. McGraw Hill Companies, International Edition, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Paul M (2001) 15000 liter bioreactor gas dispersion, oxygen transfer and blending studies. Mixing Technology Development ProgramGoogle Scholar
- Saret B, Kritchart W, Nattawin C, Jenyuk L, Phaly H, Pisut P (2019) Development of modified airlift reactor (MALR) for improving oxygen transfer: optimize design and operation condition using ‘design of experiment’ methodology. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1579869
- Zlokarnik M (1978) Sorption characteristics for gas-liquid contacting in mixing vessels. Adv Biochem Eng 8:133–151Google Scholar