Advertisement

Aquaculture International

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 195–208 | Cite as

A microplate incubation method for assessing egg quality of the barfin flounder: effects of well size and rearing medium on larval viability

  • Tatsuya Unuma
  • Takashi Ichikawa
  • Sayumi Sawaguchi
  • Natsuki Hasegawa
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

In microplate incubation, fish eggs and larvae are individually reared in small wells. This technique is useful for assessing hatchability, larval survival, and larval abnormality. Nevertheless, the optimal well size (water volume) and rearing media required to ensure full larval viability vary among species. In this study, we examined the effects of well size and rearing medium on hatchability and larval viability of the barfin flounder Verasper moseri and attempted to optimize the incubation conditions for this species. Fertilized eggs were individually stocked in 24-, 48-, and 96-well plates filled with 2, 1, and 0.25 mL seawater containing antibiotics (penicillin G potassium and streptomycin sulfate) and bovine serum albumin (BSA), both of which are required in the rearing media for other species. The eggs were incubated without replacing the medium. Hatch timing and rate were similar in all plate types. Completion of yolk resorption was delayed only in the 96-well plates. In the 24- and 48-well plates, the larvae survived more than 2 weeks after complete yolk resorption until they were starved to death. When the antibiotics were removed from the media, larval mortality increased. In contrast, removal of BSA from the media did not increase yolk sac stage larval mortality for barfin flounder unlike that reported for other species. These results indicate that the use of 24- and 48-well microplates filled with seawater containing antibiotics is optimal for barfin flounder larval viability beyond the completion of yolk resorption.

Keywords

Antibiotics Bovine serum albumin Deformity Hatch Larva Microtiter plate Survival Verasper moseri 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Takaaki Kayaba at the Hokkaido Research Organization for helpful discussion on our study and critical reading of this manuscript. We also thank Suzuko Tanaka, Yuko Toya, and Yasuko Fuchigami at the Hokkaido National Fisheries Research Institute for technical assistance throughout the study.

Funding

This study was funded, in part, by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (Research and Development Projects for Application in the New Policy of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Bromage R, Jones J, Randall C, Thrush M, Davies B, Springate J, Duston J, Barker G (1992) Broodstock management, fecundity, egg quality and the timing of egg production in the rainbow trout (Oncorhiynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 100:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bromage NR, Bruce MP, Basavaraja N, Rana K, Shields R, Young C, Dye J, Smith P, Gillespie M, Gamble J (1994) Egg quality determinants in finfish: the role of over-ripening with special reference to the timing of stripping in the Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus. J World Aquacult Soc 25:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chai Y, Tosaka R, Abe T, Sago K, Sago Y, Hatanaka E, Ijiri S, Adachi S (2010) The relationship between the developmental stage of oocytes in various seasons and the quality of the egg obtained by artificial maturation in the feminized Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Aquac Sci 58:269–278Google Scholar
  4. Furuita H, Unuma T, Nomura K, Tanaka H, Okuzawa K, Sugita T, Yamamoto T (2006) Lipid and fatty acid composition of eggs producing larvae with high survival rate in the Japanese eel. J Fish Biol 69:1178–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grant B, Davie A, Taggart JB, Selly S-LC, Picchi N, Bradley C, Prodohl P, Leclercq E, Migaud H (2016) Seasonal changes in broodstock spawning performance and egg quality in ballan wrasse (Labrus bergylta). Aquaculture 464:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Horie N, Utoh T, Mikawa N, Yamada Y, Okamura A, Tanaka S, Tsukamoto K (2008) Influence of artificial fertilization methods of the hormone-treated Japanese eel Anguilla japonica upon the quality of eggs and larvae (comparison between stripping-insemination and spontaneous spawning methods). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 74:26–35 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Izumi H, Gen K, Horiuchi M, Matsuya N, Ijiri S, Adachi S (2016) Quantitative comparisons of maternal transcripts related to cell division between good and poor quality eggs from artificially matured Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Aquac Sci 64:29–42Google Scholar
  8. Kaji T, Kodama M, Arai H, Tanaka M, Tagawa M (2003) Prevention of surface death of marine fish larvae by the addition of egg white into rearing water. Aquaculture 224:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawabe R, Nakatsuka N, Wada T, Sawaguchi S, Murakami O, Kamiyama K, Kito K, Furukawa S, Kayaba T (2017) Behaviourally mediated thermal experience in relation to final oocyte maturation by free-swimming barfin flounder (Verasper moseri). Fish Res 186:544–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kayaba T (2005) Studies on techniques for reliable production of seed of barfin flounder Verasper moseri. Sci Rep Hokkaido Fish Exp Stn 69:1–116 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Kayaba T, Sugimoto T, Adachi S, Yamauchi K (2003) Effects of residual over-ripened eggs on egg quality deterioration in barfin flounder Verasper moseri. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 69:414–416 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kayaba T, Wada T, Kamiyama K, Murakami O, Yoshida H, Sawaguchi S, Ichikawa T, Fujinami Y, Fukuda S (2014) Gonadal maturation and spawning migration of stocked female barfin flounder Verasper moseri off the Pacific coast of northern Japan. Fish Sci 80:735–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kayaba T, Wada T, Murakami O, Sawaguchi S, Kawabe R (2015) A new method for identifying the male spawning period of fish using sperm duct volume as an index. Fish Res 170:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kayaba T, Wada T, Murakami O, Kamiyama K, Sawaguchi S, Kawabe R (2017) Elucidating the spawning migration and core reproductive duration of male flatfish using sperm duct volume as an index for better fishery advice and management. Fish Res 186:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kjørsvik E, Mangor-Jensen A, Holmefjord I (1990) Egg quality in fishes. Adv Mar Biol 26:71–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koya Y, Matsubara T, Nakagawa T (1994) Efficient artificial fertilization method based on the ovulation cycle in barfin flounder Verasper moseri. Fish Sci 60:537–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurita Y (2006) Procedures to estimate reproductive traits of fish by combining field surveys and tank experiments. Bull Fish Res Agen Suppl 4:87–99 (in Japanease with English abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Kurokawa T, Okamoto T, Gen K, Uji S, Murashita K, Unuma T, Nomura K, Matsubara H, Kim S-K, Ohta H, Tanaka H (2008) Influence of water temperature on morphological deformities in cultured larvae of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, at completion of yolk resorption. J World Aquacult Soc 39:726–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurokawa T, Shibahara H, Gen K, Nomura K, Tanaka H (2013) Determination of periods of sensitivity to low-salinity and low-temperature conditions during the early development of cultured Japanese eel Anguilla japonica larvae with respect to the rate of morphological deformity at completion of yolk resorption. Fish Sci 79:673–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marentette JR, Sullivan CA, Lavalle C, Shires K, Parrott JL (2015) Effects of multi-well plate incubation on embryo-larval development in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Comp Biochem Physiol 167C:173–182Google Scholar
  21. Melo KM, Oliveira R, Grisolia CK, Domingues I, Pieczarka JC, Filho JS, Nagamachi CY (2015) Short-term exposure to low doses of rotenone induces developmental, biochemical, behavioral, and histological changes in fish. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:13926–13938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mushiake K, Sekiya S (1993) A trial of evaluation of activity in striped jack, Pseudocaranx dentex larvae. Suisanzoshoku 155-160(in Japanese, with English abstract):41Google Scholar
  23. Mushiake K, Fujimoto H, Shimma H (1993) A trial of evaluation of activity in yellowtail, Seriola quinqueradiata larvae. Suisanzoshoku 41:339–344 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Mylonas CC, Sigelaki I, Divanach P, Mananõs E, Carrillo M, Afonso-Polyviou A (2003) Multiple spawning and egg quality of individual European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) females after repeated injections of GnRHa. Aquaculture 221:605–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mylonas CC, Salone S, Biglino T, de Mello PH, Fakriadis I, Sigelaki I, Duncan N (2016) Enhancement of oogenesis/spermatogenesis in meagre Argyrosomus regius using a combination of temperature control and GnRHa treatments. Aquaculture 464:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagler JJ, Adams BA, Cyr DG (1999) Egg production, fertility, and hatch success of American plaice held in captivity. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Okamoto T, Kurokawa T, Gen K, Murashita K, Nomura K, Kim S-K, Matsubara H, Ohta H, Tanaka H (2009) Influence of salinity on morphological deformities in cultured larvae of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, at completion of yolk resorption. Aquaculture 293:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okamura A, Yamada Y, Horie N, Utoh T, Mikawa N, Tanaka S, Tsukamoto K (2007) Effects of water temperature on early development of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Fish Sci 73:1241–1248Google Scholar
  29. Panini EB, Mylonas CC, Zanuy S, Carrillo M, Ramos J, Bruce MP (2001) Incubation of embryos and larvae of marine fish using microtiter plates. Aquac Int 9:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Papadaki M, Papadopoulou M, Siggelaki I, Mylonas CC (2008) Egg and sperm production and quality of sharpsnout sea bream (Diplodus puntazzo) in captivity. Aquaculture 276:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perović A, Perović S, Seiler T-B, Hollert H (2013) In vitro cytotoxic and teratogenic potential of sediment extracts from Skadar Lake using fish cell line RTL-W1 and Danio rerio embryos. Arch Biol Sci 65:1539–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Røjbek MC, Støttrup JG, Jacobsen C, Tomkiewicz J, Nielsen A, Trippel EA (2014) Effects of dietary fatty acids on the production and quality of eggs and larvae of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Aquac Nutr 20:654–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaeck M, De Swaef E, Van den Broeck W, Van Nevel S, Boon N, De Geyter N, Morent R, Demeestere K, Duchateau L, Coulombet C, Haesebrouck F, Decostere A (2016) Germ-free sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax larval model: a valuable tool in the study of host-microbe interactions. Dis Aquat Org 117:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shields RJ, Brown NP, Bromage NR (1997) Blastomere morphology as a predictive measure of fish egg viability. Aquaculture 155:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimma H, Tsujigado A (1981) Some biochemical qualities of bred scorpenoid fish, Sebastiscus marmoratus, and activities of their larvae. Bull Natl Res Inst Aquac 2:11–20 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Sulaeman S, Fotedar R (2017) Reproductive performance of domesticated broodstock of silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus (Mitchell 1838) and the relationship between oil globule fragmentation and egg quality. Indones Aquac J 12:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tagawa M, Kaji T, Kinoshita M, Tanaka M (2004) Effect of stocking density and addition of proteins on larval survival in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 230:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thorsen A, Trippel EA, Lambert Y (2003) Experimental methods to monitor the production and quality of eggs of captive marine fish. J Northwest Atl Fish Sci 33:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Unuma T, Kondo S, Tanaka H, Kagawa K, Nomura K, Ohta H (2004) Determination of the rates of fertilization hatching and larval survival in the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, using tissue culture microplates. Aquaculture 241:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Unuma T, Kurokawa T, Tokuda M, Nomura K, Tanaka H (2011) Teratogenic effects of the chemicals used for assessing egg quality of Japanese eel with tissue culture microplates. Aquac Sci 59:307–313 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  41. Unuma T, Sawaguchi S, Hasegawa N, Tsuda N, Tanaka T, Nomura K, Tanaka H (2012) Optimum temperature of rearing water during artificial induction of ovulation in Japanese eel. Aquaculture 358–359:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Overzee HMJ, Rijnsdorp AD (2015) Effects of fishing during the spawning period: implications for sustainable management. Rev Fish Biol Fish 25:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wada T, Kamiyama K, Shimamura S, Yoshida T, Kayaba T, Sasaki M (2013) Detection of fishing grounds, fishing season, and size distribution of stocked barfin flounder Verasper moseri in southern Tohoku, the Pacific coast of eastern Japan. Aquac Sci 61:39–46Google Scholar
  44. Wada T, Kamiyama K, Shimamura S, Murakami O, Misaka T, Sasaki M, Kayaba T (2014) Fishery characteristics of barfin flounder Verasper moseri in southern Tohoku, the major spawning ground, after the start of large-scale stock enhancement in Hokkaido, Japan. Fish Sci 80:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wakefield CB, Fairclough DV, Lenanton RCJ, Potter IC (2011) Spawning and nursery habitat partitioning and movement patterns of Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) on the lower west coast of Australia. Fish Res 109:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoshikawa M (2012) Improvement in hatching rates in the Japanese eel Anguilla japonica by the control of rearing temperatures in the late stage of maturation in the female parents. Aquaculture 338–341:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hokkaido National Fisheries Research InstituteJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyKushiroJapan
  2. 2.Japan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyYokohamaJapan
  3. 3.National Research Institute of AquacultureJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyMinami-iseJapan

Personalised recommendations