Aquaculture International

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1901–1911 | Cite as

Genetic parameters for growth and survival traits in Litopenaeus vannamei at different ages

  • Jiachen Zhang
  • Fujun Cao
  • Jianyong Liu
  • Ruipeng Yuan
Article
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to estimate the genetic parameters for growth and survival tolerance traits in Litopenaeus vannamei at different ages (weeks 6, 10, 14, and 18). Sixty-five full-sib families (including 30 half-sib families) of L. vannamei, which were produced by 50 sires and 65 dams, were obtained by artificial insemination. There were a total of 6500 tagged shrimps representing 65 full-sib families evaluated for growth and survival traits in this study. The heritability estimates for growth traits were moderate to high (0.24 to 0.46), which suggested that selection for increasing growth traits were feasible, but the heritability of survival traits estimated on the observed scales were also low (0.01 to 0.06). The genetic correlations between growth traits (including body length and weight) within age were all positive and high, which ranged from 0.82 to 0.95 (P < 0.01). A significant correlation between growth traits showed that only selecting one growth trait for better growth and other correlated traits can be improved simultaneously. The genetic correlation between growth and survival traits within age were positive (0.02 to 0.05) at the early life stage and negative (−0.06 to −0.22) at later growth phase, which indicated that selecting for growth traits may not cause a positive correlated response in survival traits. Our results also showed that the uniformity ratio and correlation coefficient of families at adjacent growth stage increasing with age, which suggested that selection applied at early stage may result in only poor response and selection after week 14 can increase selection accuracy and accelerate the breeding process.

Keywords

Genetic parameter Growth traits Survival traits Litopenaeus vannamei 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Silang Wen, Sipeng Wen, and Zhiguo Hu for their valuable technical assistance in both the laboratory and field trials. This work was financially supported by National Science and technology support program (2015BAD13B03-3), Regional demonstration project of marine economic innovation and development of Guangdong Province of China (GD2012-A02-016), Marine Fisheries Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China (No. A201208B05), and Science Research and Technology Development Program of Guangxi Province of China (No. 14125007-2-9).

References

  1. Argue BJ, Arce SM, Lotz JM, Moss SM (2002) Selective breeding of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) for growth and resistance to Taura syndrome virus. Aquaculture 204(3–4):447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campos-Montes GR, Montaldo HH, Martínez-Ortega A, Jiménez AM, Castillo-Juárez H (2012) Genetic parameters for growth and survival traits in pacific white shrimp Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei from a nucleus population undergoing a two-stage selection program. Aquac Res 21(2):299–310Google Scholar
  3. Castillo-Juárez H, Casares JCQ, Campos-Montes G, Villela CC, Ortega AM, Montaldo HH (2007) Heritability for body weight at harvest size in the Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei, from a multi-environment experiment using univariate and multivariate animal models. Aquaculture 273(1):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charo-Karisa H, Komen H, Rezk MA, Ponzoni RW, Arendonk JAMV, Bovenhuis H (2006) Heritability estimates and response to selection for growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in low-input earthen ponds. Aquaculture 261(2):479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coman GJ, Arnold SJ, Wood AT, Kube PD (2010) Age: age genetic correlations for weight of Penaeus monodon, reared in broodstock tank systems. Aquaculture 307(1–2):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donato MD, Manrique R, Ramirez R, Mayer L, Howell C (2005) Mass selection and inbreeding effects on a cultivated strain of Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei in Venezuela. Aquaculture 247(1):159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 2.1. VSN International Ltd. Hemel Hemptead. HP1 1ES. UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Gitterle T, Salte R, Gjerde B, Cock J, Johansen H, Salazar M, Lozano C, Rye M (2005a) Genetic (co)variation in resistance to white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and harvest weight in Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei. Aquaculture 246(1–4):139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gitterle T, Rye M, Salte R, Cock J, Johansen H, Lozano C, Suárez JA, Gjerde B (2005b) Genetic (co)variation in harvest body weight and survival in Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei under standard commercial conditions. Aquaculture 243(1):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gitterle T, Ødegård J, Gjerde B, Rye M, Salte R (2006) Genetic parameters and accuracy of selection for resistance to white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei using different statistical models. Aquaculture 251(2):210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gjedrem T, Fimland E (1995) Potential benefits from high health and genetically improved shrimp stocks. Swimming through troubled water. Proceedings of the special session on shrimp farming. Baton Rouge, LA: World Aquaculture Society. 6065Google Scholar
  12. Hetzel DJ, Crocos PJ, Davis GP, Moore SS, Preston NC (2000) Response to selection and heritability for growth in the Kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus. Aquaculture 181(3):215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill B (2002) National and international impacts of white spot disease of shrimp. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 22(2):58–65Google Scholar
  14. Hung D, Nguyen NH, Ponzoni RW, Hurwood DA, Mather PB (2013) Quantitative genetic parameter estimates for body and carcass traits in a cultured stock of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) selected for harvest weight in Vietnam. Aquaculture 404:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hung D, Nguyen NH, Hurwood DA, Mather PB (2014) Quantitative genetic parameters for body traits at different ages in a cultured stock of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) selected for fast growth. Mar Freshw Res 65(3):198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibarra AM, Pérez-Rostro CI, Ramírez JL, Ortega-Estrada E (2007) Genetics of the resistance to hypoxia in postlarvae and juveniles of the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei (Boone 1931). Aquac Res 38(8):838–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenway M, Macbeth M, Salmon M, McPhee C, Benzie J, Wilson K, Knibb W (2006) Heritability and genetic correlations of growth and survival in black tiger prawn Penaeus monodon reared in tanks. Aquaculture 259(1):138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishna G, Gopikrishna G, Gopal C, Jahageerdar S, Ravichandran P, Kannappan S, Pillai SM, Paulpandi S, Kiran RP, Saraswati R (2011) Genetic parameters for growth and survival in Penaeus monodon cultured in India. Aquaculture 318(1):74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li W, Luan S, Luo K, Sui J, Xu X, Tan J, Kong J (2015) Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction for cold tolerance, body weight and survival of the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei at different temperatures. Aquaculture 441:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lightner DV (1999) The penaeid shrimp viruses TSV, IHHNV, WSSV, and YHV: current status in the Americas, available diagnostic methods, and management strategies. J Appl Aquac 9(2):27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lightner DV (2011) Virus diseases of farmed shrimp in the western hemisphere (the Americas): a review. J Invertebr Pathol 106(1):110–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Liu Z, Sun X (2011) The effects of inbreeding on production traits of the southern bay scallop Argopecten irradians concentricus. J Shellfish Res 30(1):109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luan TD, Olesen INGRID, Ødegård JØRGEN, Kolstad KARI, Dan NC (2008) Genotype by environment interaction for harvest body weight and survival of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in brackish and fresh water ponds. In Proceedings from the Eighth International Symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture 1: 231–240Google Scholar
  24. Luan S, Yang G, Wang J, Luo K, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Hu HL, Kong J (2012) Genetic parameters and response to selection for harvest body weight of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture 362:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luan S, Luo K, Ruan XH, Cao BX, Wang H, Du XF, Zhang K, Kong J (2013) Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction for body weight and survival of pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica 44(2):445–452Google Scholar
  26. Luan S, Wang J, Yang G, Luo K, Chen X, Gao Q, Hu HL, Kong J (2015) Genetic parameters of survival for six generations in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquac Res 46(6):1345–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moss DR, Moss SM, Lotz JM (2013) Estimation of genetic parameters for survival to multiple isolates of Taura syndrome virus in a selected population of Pacific white shrimp Penaeus (litopenaeus) vannamei. Aquaculture 416:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen HM, Ødegård J, Olesen I, Gjerde B, Ardo L, Jeney G, Jeney Z (2010) Genetic analysis of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains: I: genetic parameters and heterosis for growth traits and survival. Aquaculture 304(1):14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ødegård J, Gitterle T, Madsen P, Meuwissen TH, Yazdi MH, Gjerde B, Pulgarin C, Rye M (2011) Quantitative genetics of taura syndrome resistance in pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei): a cure model approach. Genet Sel Evol 43(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pérez-Rostro CI, Ibarra AM (2003a) Quantitative genetic parameter estimates for size and growth rate traits in Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei (Boone 1931) when reared indoors. Aquac Res 34(7):543–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez-Rostro CI, Ibarra AM (2003b) Heritabilities and genetic correlations of size traits at harvest size in sexually dimorphic Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) grown in two environments. Aquac Res 34(12):1079–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pérez-Rostro CI, Ramirez JL, Ibarra AM (1999) Maternal and cage effects on genetic parameter estimation for Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone. Aquac Res 30(9):681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ponzoni RW, Hamzah A, Tan S, Kamaruzzaman N (2005) Genetic parameters and response to selection for live weight in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 247(1):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preston NP, Crocos PJ, Keys SJ, Coman GJ, Koenig R (2004) Comparative growth of selected and non-selected Kuruma shrimp Penaeus (marsupenaeus) japonicus in commercial farm ponds; implications for broodstock production. Aquaculture 231(1):73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rezk MA, Ponzoni RW, Khaw HL, Kamel E, Dawood T, John G (2009) Selective breeding for increased body weight in a synthetic breed of Egyptian Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: response to selection and genetic parameters. Aquaculture 293(3):187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruan XH, Luo K, Luan S, Xu SY, Chen RJ, Chen GL (2013) Evaluation of growth performance in Litopenaeus vannamei populations introduced from other nations. J Fish China 37(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th edition. (New York. 937 pp.)Google Scholar
  38. Su GS, Liljedahl LE, Gall GA (2002) Genetic correlations between body weight at different ages and with reproductive traits in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 213(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sui J, Luan S, Luo K, Meng X, Cao B, Liu N, Li WJ, Lu X, Chai Z, Kong J (2016) Genetic parameters and response to selection of harvest body weight of the Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis after five generations of multi-trait selection. Aquaculture 452:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thoa NP, Knibb W, Ninh NH, Van Dai N, Nhat PH, Nguyen NH (2015) Genetic variation in survival of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus, 1758) fry during the early phase of rearing in brackish water environment (5–10ppt). Aquaculture 442:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trọng TQ, Mulder HA, van Arendonk JA, Komen H (2013) Heritability and genotype by environment interaction estimates for harvest weight, growth rate, and shape of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) grown in river cage and VAC in Vietnam. Aquaculture 384:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vehviläinen H, Kause A, Quinton C, Koskinen H, Paananen T (2008) Survival of the currently fittest: genetics of rainbow trout survival across time and space. Genetics 180(1):507–516PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiachen Zhang
    • 1
  • Fujun Cao
    • 1
  • Jianyong Liu
    • 1
  • Ruipeng Yuan
    • 1
  1. 1.College of FisheriesGuangdong Ocean UniversityZhanjiangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations