Advertisement

Comparison of in-vitro bioassays for evaluation of the response of different stages of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato to calcium alginate encapsulated pheromone beads

  • S. GowrishankarEmail author
  • Bhaskaran Ravi Latha
  • C. Sreekumar
  • V. Leela
Article

Abstract

Tick sex pheromone (SP), assembly pheromone (AP) and their combination (SP + AP) were encapsulated in calcium alginate beads. In vitro bioassays, namely Petri dish and olfactometer assays, were employed to estimate the level of attraction of the various stages of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, namely unfed and engorged (fed) larvae, nymphs, females, and males to the different pheromones. The study revealed that only the Petri dish assay was suitable to evaluate the response of larval stages whereas the olfactometer bioassay could also be used for evaluating the response of all other stages. Attraction to pheromone encapsulated calcium alginate beads of all tick stage was higher in the Petri dish assay than in the olfactometer assay.

Keywords

Ticks Petri dish bioassay Olfactometer bioassay 

Notes

References

  1. Anwar A, Qader SAU, Riaz A, Iqbal S, Azhar A (2009) Calcium alginate: a support material for immobilisation of proteases from newly isolated strain of Bacillus subtilis KIBGE-HAS. World Appl Sci J 7:1281–1289Google Scholar
  2. Carr AL, Roe M (2016) Acarine attractants: chemoreception, bioassay, chemistry and control. Pestic Biochem Physiol 131:60–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr AL, Roe RM, Arellano C, Sonenshine DE, Schal C, Apperson CS (2013) Responses of Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis to odorants that attract haematophagous insects. Med Vet Entomol 27:86–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhivya B (2013) Semiochemical sustained release device for the control of dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. M.V.Sc., thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  5. Latha BR (2012) Semiochemical—a novel thought for tick control. J Vet Anim Sci 43:1–10Google Scholar
  6. Otieno DA, Hassanali A, Obenchain FD, Steinberg A, Galun R (1985) Identification of guanine as an assembly pheromone of ticks. Insect Sci Appl 6:667–670Google Scholar
  7. Ranju RS, Latha BR, Leela V, Basith SA (2012) Field trials to attract the questing stages of brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus using tick pheromone-acaricide complex. J Parasit Dis 37:84–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sonenshine DE (2004) Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control. Parasitol 129:S404–S425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Yoder JA, Stevens BW (2000) Attraction of immature stages of the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) to 2,6-dichlorophenol. Exp Appl Acarol 24:159–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Gowrishankar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bhaskaran Ravi Latha
    • 1
  • C. Sreekumar
    • 2
  • V. Leela
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Madras Veterinary CollegeTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife Science, Madras Veterinary CollegeTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Veterinary Physiology, Madras Veterinary CollegeTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations