Advertisement

Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 27–41 | Cite as

The response of three species of phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to synthetic pyrethroid pesticides in the laboratory and the field

  • Satoshi KakokiEmail author
  • Takeshi Kamimuro
  • Yuki Ikenoue
  • Mahomi Inokuchi
  • Katsuo Tsuda
  • Yositaka Sakamaki
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

The Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida, is a major pest in tea fields [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] in Japan. However, recently, there have been some instances where acaricides are no longer applied as a result of the low occurrence of T. kanzawai in tea fields in Japan. In the period of 2015–2017, surveys of predatory mites in the study tea field detected Amblyseius eharai Amitai and Swirski, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot, Euseius sojaensis (Ehara), Amblyseius obtuserellus Wainstein and Begljarov, and Typhlodromus vulgaris Ehara in tea fields, but not Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha), indicating that a major change in the composition of the phytoseiid mite population had occurred. In laboratory studies, we confirmed the ability to avoid synthetic pyrethroid insecticides of the major beneficial mites in tea fields, A. eharai and P. persimilis, but not of E. sojaensis, a predatory mite whose population declined heavily after pesticide application. Attempts are made in this study to associate the decrease in T. kanzawai frequency in Japan with changes in pesticide used, method of spraying, and composition of the phytoseiid mite population. By continuing the method of pesticide spraying (‘partial surface’), which leaves refugia in the leaf layer with sub-lethal dosages of pesticide, phytoseiid mites are aided to evade pesticides, resulting in maintenance of the composition of the phytoseiid mite populations in terms of diversity and abundance. Maintaining the diversity and abundance of Phytoseiidae may have contributed to the stabilization of the T. kanzawai population at low densities in Japanese tea fields.

Keywords

Phytoseiid mite Behavioral avoidance Method of spraying Natural enemies Temporal variation Pyrethroid pesticide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. H. Kishimoto (Division of Apple Research, Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, NARO), Dr. S. Toyoshima (Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO), and Dr. S. Yano (Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University) for their support. We thank Mr. S. Nakakihara and other staff of the Kagoshima Prefectural Institute for Agricultural Development and students of the Faculty of Agriculture Kagoshima University for their help with the research. Our special thanks go to Dr. A. Fujiie, Mr. S. Sato, Ms. M. Uchino, and staff of the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council for their continuous encouragement throughout the study. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful and constructive comments that helped to improve our manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry (27019C).

References

  1. Ehara S (1993) Plant mites of Japan in color. Zennokyo Shuppan, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Ehara S (2007) A guide to the phytoseiid mites of Japan (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Plant Prot 10:78–120 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Fukunaga K, Ishiyama M (2001) Acaricide resistance of Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai on tea in Kyoto prefecture. Proc Kansai Pl Prot 43:17–18.  https://doi.org/10.4165/kapps1958.43.0_17 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. Hamamura T (1986) Studies on the biological control of Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida by the chemical resistant predacious mite, Amblyseius longispinosus (Evans) in tea fields (Acarina: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). Bull Natl Res Inst Tea 21:121–201 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  5. Hamamura T, Isobe K (1998) The resistance against synthetic pyrethroid pesticides of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. J Acarol Soc Jpn 7:57.  https://doi.org/10.2300/acari.7.55 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Hashimoto T, Motoyama N, Mizutani K, Shinjo G (2000) Repellent and lethal effects of seven chemicals on house dust mites, Dermatophagoides farinae Hughes (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acari: Acaridae). Med Entomol Zool 51:275–281.  https://doi.org/10.7601/mez.51.275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ikeda F, Yamamoto A (1989) Resurgence of tetranychid mites after spraying of synthetic pyrethroid in tea fields. Annu Rep Kanto Tosan Plant Prot Soc 36:187–188.  https://doi.org/10.11337/ktpps1954.1989.187 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Kakoki S, Tokuda A, Kamimuro T (2015) Pesticide reduction by a riding-type pesticide sprayer in tea fields that makes use of a small fog nozzle and a ventilator. Tea Res J 120:37–45.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.2015.37 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kakoki S, Kamimuro T, Tsuda K, Sakamaki Y (2018) Use of a lower-volume, surface pesticide spray conserves spider assemblages in a tea field. J Econ Entomol 111:1595–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawai A (2001) Effects of chemicals on the population of Amblyseius womersleyi Schicha (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida (Acari: Tetranychidae) when the tops and the inside of tea bushes were sprayed. Tea Res J 92:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.2001.92_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawai A, Kohata K, Yamaguchi Y (1999) Deposition of chemicals on various parts of tea bushes sprayed on the plucking surface. Appl Entomol Zool 34:387–389.  https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.34.387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kishimoto H (2002) Species composition and seasonal occurrence of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) and their predators in Japanese pear orchards with different agrochemical spraying programs. Appl Entomol Zool 37:603–615.  https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2002.603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kishimoto H, Yaginuma K, Toyama M (2018) Effects of pesticides on four native generalist phytoseiid species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 62:29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.2018.29 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masui S, Katayama H, Tsuchiya M (2018) Occurrence of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) and natural enemies in citrus fields under conventional pesticide application in Shizuoka Prefecture. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 62:47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.2018.47 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McMurtry JA (1992) Dynamics and potential impact of ‘generalist’ phytoseiids in agroecosystems and possibilities for establishment of exotic species. Exp Appl Acarol 14:371–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mochizuki M (1990) A strain of the predatory mite Amblyseius longispinosus (Evans) resistant to permethrin, developing in the tea plantation of Shizuoka Prefecture (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 34:171–174.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.34.171 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munger F (1942) A method for rearing citrus thrips in the laboratory. J Econ Entomol 35:373–375.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/35.3.373 Google Scholar
  18. Nagatomo S, Atari N, Onimaru T, Nonaka T (1991) Studies on the control of Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida by the predacious mite, Amblyseius longispinosus (Evans) in tea fields. Bull Kagoshima Tea Exp Stn 7:76 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Osakabe M (1973) Studies on acaricide resistance of the Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida, parasitic on tea plant. Bull Tea Res Stn Minist Agric For 8:1–95 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Osakabe M (1986) Problems on the control of tea insect pests in Japan. Tea Res J 64:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.1986.64_1 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozawa A (2013) Effects of insecticide application on natural enemy complex in tea fields. Bull Shizuoka Res Inst Agric For 6:19–24 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. Ozawa A, Oishi T, Furuki T, Ishigami S, Yoshida R, Takafuji A (2006) Long-term fluctuation of populations of Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida, in commercial tea fields for last thirty years in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Tea Res J 102:31–40.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.2006.102_31 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Ozawa A, Uchiyama T, Yoshizaki M (2014) Selection of biodiversity indicators for environmentally friendly agriculture in tea fields of Tokai area of mild climate. In: Nakasuji F (ed) Selection of functional biodiversity indicators and development of assessment methods. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, Tokyo, pp 113–121 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. Santoso S, Takafuji A, Amano H, Ozawa A (2004) Species composition of Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in tea fields with different management practices in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. J Acarol Soc Jpn 13:77–82.  https://doi.org/10.2300/acari.13.77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SAS Institute (2007) JMP user’s guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  26. Shibao M, Ioku Y (2016) Control of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch in greenhouse strawberries by releasing Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Ann Rept Kansai Pl Prot 58:73–76 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shibao M, Ehara S, Hosomi A, Tanaka H (2006) Effect of insecticide application on the population density of yellow tea thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Euseius sojaensis (Ehara) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on grapes. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 50:247–252.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.2006.247 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinkaji N (1991) Tetranychus urticae Koch, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval). In: Yushima T, Kamano S, Tamaki Y (eds) Rearing methods of insects. Japan Plant Protection Association, Tokyo, pp 372–373 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Takafuji A, Chant DA (1976) Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res Popul Ecol 17:255–310.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Takafuji A, Inoue M (1993) The effect of permethrin spray on the dispersal of Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida and the abundance of its predators. Proc Kansai Pl Prot 35:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.4165/kapps1958.35.0_19 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Takahashi F, Inoue M, Takafuji A (1998) Management of the spider-mite population in a vinylhouse vinery by releasing Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot onto the ground cover. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 42:71–76.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.42.71 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Toyoshima S (2014) Comparison of four techniques to estimate phytoseiid mite density in tea plantations with low density of Tetanychus urticae. Tea Res J 117:15–25.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.2014.117_15 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Toyoshima S, Kishimoto H, Goto C (2015a) Manual of discrimination of Phytoseiid species for beginners (1st edition). NARO, Tokyo, 18 pp. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Toyoshima S, Yorozuya H, Sato Y (2015b) Estimation of the density of phytoseiid mites by leaf-sampling and ‘Phyto-traps’ in Japanese tea plantations. Tea Res J 120:17–23.  https://doi.org/10.5979/cha.2015.17 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ullah MS, Hanawa M, Gotoh T (2016) Pesticide-mediated displacement of a phytoseiid predator, Neoseiulus womersleyi, by another phytoseiid predator, N. californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 69:453–464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0053-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van den Boom CEM, Van Beek TA, Dicke M (2003) Differences among plant species in acceptance by the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. J Appl Ent 127:177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00726.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wakou M, Odagiri M (1985) Effect of some acaricides on the two spotted spider mite and on field population of predacious mite. Ann Rept Plant Prot N Jpn 36:90–93.  https://doi.org/10.11455/kitanihon1966.1985.90 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  38. Yamazaki D, Itoyama K (2015) Seasonal occurrence of Phytoseiid mites in urbanized Japanese pear orchards. Annu Rep Kanto Tosan Plant Prot Soc 62:153–155.  https://doi.org/10.11337/ktpps.2015.153 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tea DivisionKagoshima Prefectural Institute for Agricultural DevelopmentMinamikyushuJapan
  2. 2.Kagoshima Prefectural Institute for Agricultural DevelopmentKanoyaJapan
  3. 3.Agricultural Promotion and Advisory DivisionKagoshima Prefectural Osumi Regional Promotion BureauKanoyaJapan
  4. 4.Entomological LaboratoryThe Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
  5. 5.Entomological LaboratoryThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations