Advertisement

Entrepreneurs’ resource background, innovation, philanthropy and the exit of external Investment in Private Ventures in China

  • Jintong Tang
  • Zhi Tang
  • Renhong ZhuEmail author
  • Xinchun Li
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Retaining external investment is an important task for private firms. However, the entrepreneurial financing literature has primarily focused on how to attract, instead of retain, start-up funding. Integrating social embeddedness, signaling, and strategic choice theories, we propose that entrepreneurs’ resource background, philanthropic, and innovative activities affect the exit speed of external investment for Chinese private ventures. In particular, we propose that external investment exits entrepreneurs with deprived resources faster than those more resourceful entrepreneurs. Yet, external investment stays longer when less resourceful entrepreneurs commit to innovative or philanthropic activities.

Keywords

Innovation Philanthropy External investment exit Resource background Signaling theory Social embeddedness theory China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Saint Louis University’s Faculty Research Leave Award, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grants # 71628204 and 71810107002).

References

  1. Acs, Z. 2006. How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(1): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4): 678–690.Google Scholar
  3. Agostino, M., & Trivieri, F. 2014. Does trade credit play a signaling role? Some evidence from SMEs microdata. Small Business Economics, 42: 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahlers, G., Cumming, D., Gunther, C., & Schweizer, D. 2015. Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 39(4): 955–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.Google Scholar
  6. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2001. Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(4): 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2006. Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. 2008. Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of world business, 43(4): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ahlstrom, D., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. 2018. New methods of entrepreneurial firm financing: Fintech, crowdfunding and corporate governance implications. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(5): 310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arthurs, J., Hoskisson, R., Busenitz, L., & Johnson, R. 2008. Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Astley, G. W., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1983. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2): 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balboa, M., & Marti, J. 2007. Factors that determine the reputation of private equity managers in developing markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barnett, M., & Salomon, R. 2006. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11): 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barrett, P., & Sexton, M. 2006. Innovation in small, project-based construction firms. British Journal of Management, 17: 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baron, R. A., Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Zhang, Y. 2018. Bribes as entrepreneurial actions: Why underdog entrepreneurs feel compelled to use them. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6): 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bergh, D., Connelly, B., Ketchen, D., & Shannon, L. 2014. Signaling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8): 1334–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bettignies, J., & Brander, J. 2007. Financing entrepreneurship: Bank finance versus venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 808–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bian, Y. 2002. Chinese social stratification and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bian, Y., Breiger, R., Davis, D., & Galaskiewicz, J. 2005. Occupation, class, and social networks in urban China. Social Forces, 83(4): 1443–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourgeois III, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Walker, R. M. 2006. Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bruno, A., & Tyebjee, T. 1985. The entrepreneur’s search for capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruton, G., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the west. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1): 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Si, S. 2015. Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bruton, G., Chahine, S., & Filatotchev, I. 2009. Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(4): 909–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., & Moesel, D. D. 2005. Signaling in venture capitalist-new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long-term venture outcomes? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cao, Y. 2010. The investigation of the operational situation of immigrant farmers and getihu in Beijing. Labor Security World, 12: 41–43.Google Scholar
  28. Carter, R., & van Auken, H. 1990. Personal equity investment and small business financial difficulties. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 15(2): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chauvet, L., & Collier, P. 2008. Elections and economic policy in developing countries. Available at: http://basepub.dauphine.fr/bitstream/handle/123456789/4315/2008-11.pdf?sequence=1. [Accessed on May 29, 2019].
  30. Chen, F., & Zhang, X. 2009. There will be no limitation on the number of employees in getihu. Hunan Daily, July 23rd.Google Scholar
  31. Child, J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. China Family Panel Studies 2014. The Institute of Social Science Survey. China:ISSS) of Peking University.Google Scholar
  33. Chow, C., & Fung, M. 2000. Small businesses and liquidity constraints in financing business investment: Evidence from Shanghai’s manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Christensen, L., MacKey, A., & Whetten, D. 2014. Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders on creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2): 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chung, C., & Luo, X. 2013. Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. 1983. The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, (May/June): 30–50.Google Scholar
  37. Cohen, G. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99: 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Connelly, B., Certo, S., Ireland, R., & Eeutzel, C. 2011. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1): 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555–590.Google Scholar
  41. Damanpour, F., Walker, R., & Avellaneda, C. 2009. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4): 650–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Davidsson, P. 1991. Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6): 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Davis, D. 1999. Self-employment in Shanghai: A research note. China Quarterly, 157: 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dineen, B., & Allen, D. 2016. Third party employment branding: Human capital inflows and outflows following “best places to work” certifications. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. 2003. Venture capital financing and the growth of start-up firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6): 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Domínguez, G. 2014. “Corruption and elitism” fueling inequality in China. Available at: http://www.dw.de/corruption-and-elitism-fueling-inequality-in-china/a-17813952. [Accessed on May 29, 2019].
  47. Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. 2002. Board composition, share ownership, and underpricing of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 941–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(September 9): 32–33.Google Scholar
  49. Garnaut, R., Song, L., Yao, Y., & Wang, X. 2012. Private enterprise in China. ANU Press.Google Scholar
  50. Gassmann, O., & Keupp, M. M. 2007. The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalizing in the biotechnology industry: A knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 42: 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Valikangas, L. 2007. In praise of resource constraints. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(3): 14–17.Google Scholar
  52. Guo, H., Tang, J., & Su, Z. 2014. To be different or to be the same? The interactive effect of organizational regulatory legitimacy and entrepreneurial orientation on new venture performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Guo, B., Lou, Y., & Perez-Castrillo, D. 2015. Investment, duration, and exit strategies for corporate and independent venture capital backed startups. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24(2): 415–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Green, S. 1988. Is equality of opportunity a false ideal for society? The British Journal of Sociology, XXXIX, (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
  56. Grimes, M. 2010. Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. In Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, July: 763–783.Google Scholar
  57. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1439–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hansen, G. S., & Wenerfelt, B. 1989. Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Harrison, R., Dibben, M., & Mason, C. 1997. The role of trust in the informal investor’s investment decision: An exploratory analysis: 63–81. Summer:Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice.Google Scholar
  60. He, A. 2013. U.S. business asks easing of market barriers. China Daily, October 31st.Google Scholar
  61. Henry, P. 2005. Social class, market situation, and consumer’s metaphors of (dis)emplowerment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4): 766–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hite, J. 2005. Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms: 113–144. January:Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice.Google Scholar
  63. Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hoehn-Weiss, M., & Karim, S. 2014. Unpacking functional alliance portfolios: How signals of viability affect young firms’ outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1364–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Homans, G. 1961. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York:Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  66. Hrebiniak, L., & Joyce, W. 1985. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hull, C., Tang, Z., Tang, J., & Yang, J. 2019. Information diversity and innovation for born-globals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, forthcoming. Google Scholar
  68. Janney, J., & Folta, T. 2006. Moderating effects of investor experience on the signaling value of private equity placements. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. 2015. News visibility and corporate philanthropic response: Evidence from privately owned Chinese firms following the Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 563–576.Google Scholar
  71. Jonsson, S., & Lindbergh, J. 2011. The development of social capital and financing of entrepreneurial firms: From financial bootstrapping to bank funding. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, (July): 661–686.Google Scholar
  72. Katila, R., & Shane, S. 2005. When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 814–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lanzolia, G., & Frankort, H. 2016. The online shadow of offline signals: Which sellers get contracted in online B2B marketplaces? Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Welpe, I. 2006. Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 514–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Leng, Z. 2013. The discussion on the major difference in “the state’s advancement and the retreat of the private ownership”. Hongqi Wengao, 1: 17–20.Google Scholar
  76. Lester, R., & Cannella, A. 2006. Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Nov.: 755–774.Google Scholar
  77. Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. 2006. Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 44: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Li, Z. 2012. The state council’s new policy: Micro-businesses are gaining RMB 15 billion for financial report. Xinhuanet, April 28th.Google Scholar
  79. Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. 2008. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 87(2): 283–299.Google Scholar
  80. Li, Y., Yao, F. K., & Ahlstrom, D. 2015. The social dilemma of bribery in emerging economies: A dynamic model of emotion, social value, and institutional uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2): 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lin, N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. London, T. 2008. The base-of-the-pyramid perspective: A new approach to poverty alleviation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lou, B. 2006. The investigation and survey of accounting management in private ventures in Zhejiang province. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 3: 66–70.Google Scholar
  84. Lu, X. 2001. Social structural change in rural China. Unpublished manuscript in Beijing Chinese academy of social science.Google Scholar
  85. Luo, X., & Chung, C. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 404–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Luo, X., Chung, C., & Sobczak, M. 2009. How do corporate governance model differences affect foreign direct investment in emerging economies? Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 444–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Luo, X., Zhou, L., & Liu, S. 2005. Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China’s transition economy: An integrative framework and empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 58: 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Luo, Y. 1999. Environment–strategy–performance relations in small businesses in China: A case of township and village enterprises in southern China. Journal of Small Business Management, 1: 37–52.Google Scholar
  89. MacKay, R., & Chia, R. 2013. Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of NorthCo automotive. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 208–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. 2012. Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce. Information & Management, 49: 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Milakovich, M., & Gordon, G. 2012. Public administration in America. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  93. Muller, A., & Kraussl, R. 2011. Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 911–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Myers, S. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39: 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. 2013. Investment cycles and startup innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy Journal of Management, 39(5): 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Park, S., & Lou, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Park, H., & Patel, P. 2015. How does ambiguity influence IPO underpricing? The role of the signaling environment. Journal of Management Studies, 52(6): 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Payne, D., & Joyner, B. 2006. Successful U.S entrepreneurs: Identifying ethical decision-making and social responsibility behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 65: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Perotti, E. C. 1993. Bank lending in transition economies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(5): 1021–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. 2007. CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3): 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Piff, P., Kraus, M., Cote, S., Cheng, B., & Keltner, D. 2010. Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5): 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pignataro, G. 2012. Equality of opportunity: Policy and measurement paradigms. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5): 800–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Randoy, T., & Goel, S. 2003. Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: Implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Ring, P., & Van de Ven, A. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizatoinal relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. 2011. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26: 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rumelt, R. P. 1991. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rumelt, R. P. 2011. Good strategy bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. New York:Crown Business.Google Scholar
  111. Schradie, J. 2012. The trend of class, race, and ethnicity in social media inequality: Who still cannot afford to blog? Information, Communication & Society, 15(4): 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Shane, S. A. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11: 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Shang, Y. 2014. Private businesses welcome the “lukewarm” and how to deal with “the last kilometer” in implementing policies. Xinhuanet, April 17th.Google Scholar
  114. Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87: 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Spence, M. 1974. Market signaling: Information transfer in hiring and related processes. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Stacy, R. 1995. The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6): 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tang, Z., & Tang, J. 2012. Stakeholder-firm power difference, stakeholders’ CSR orientation, and SMEs’ environmental performance in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4): 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Cowden, B. J. 2017. Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, CEO dual values, and SME performance in state-owned vs. non-state-owned enterprises in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6): 883–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. The Beijing News, 2005. It is concerned that peasant workers contribute more than what they gain (September 2).Google Scholar
  120. Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G., & Ahlstrom, D. 2019. Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  121. Villanueva, J., Van de Ven, A., & Sapienza, H. 2012. Resource mobilization in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 27: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wang, M., Qiu, C., & Kong, D. 2011. Corporate social responsibility, investor behaviors, and stock market returns: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101: 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Westphal, J., Boivie, S., & Chng, D. 2006. The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wu, Z., Chua, J., & Chrisman, J. 2007. Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 875–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Yan, S. 2009. The study of the new venture financing of returned-home farmers. Science & Technology Information, 33: 409–410.Google Scholar
  126. Yi, Z., Li, Y., & Gao, W. 2010. The management effect of heterogeneous institutional investors: Based on the perspective of top management team’s compensation. Statistics and Decisions, 5: 122–125.Google Scholar
  127. Yu, B., Hao, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. F. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Zarutskie, R. 2010. The role of top management team human capital in venture capital markets: Evidence from first-time funds. Journal of Business Venturing, 25: 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zhang, H. 2009. New stages, new situations, and new problems in the growth of Chinese private venture owners. http://e sociology.cass.cn/pub/shxw/shgz/shgz53/P020090120329435159025.pdf. [Accessed on May 29, 2019].
  131. Zhang, J., Souitaris, V., Soh, P., & Wong, P. 2008. A contingent model of network utilization in early financing of technology ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, (July): 593–613.Google Scholar
  132. Zhang, X. 2018. A deep report on the current state of Chinese private ventures. https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3427437 [Accessed on May 10, 2019]
  133. Zhang, Y., & Wisersema, M. 2009. Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zhou, X. 2001. Political dynamics and bureaucratic career patterns in the People’s republic of China 1949-1994. Comparative Political Studies, 34: 1036–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Richard A. Chaifetz School of BusinessSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Saunders College of BusinessRochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Business SchoolSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations