Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1193–1219 | Cite as

Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational knowledge creation: A configurational approach

  • Feifei Jiang
  • Gang WangEmail author
  • Xu Jiang
Article

Abstract

Drawing upon the resource dependence theory, this study develops a configurational framework to focus on how business ties and market dynamism independently and interactively affect the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and organizational knowledge creation. Findings from a sample of Chinese firms indicate that a configurational approach (three-way interactions) that aligns EO, business ties, and market dynamism has greater explanatory power for organizational knowledge creation than a contingency model (two-way interactions) and a main-effect-only model. Organizational knowledge creation benefits most from an EO in the presence of both high levels of business ties and market dynamism, while it benefits least with strong business ties under low market dynamism. Overall, our findings contribute to a better understanding of whether and when an EO enhances organizational knowledge creation.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) Organizational knowledge creation Business ties Market dynamism Configuration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 71772148; no. 71402128) and the Soft Science Research Key Project of Shaanxi Province (no. 2017KRZ005) for financial support.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. The effects of predictor scaling on coefficients of regression equations. In L. S. Aiken, & S. G. West (Eds.). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Ch. 3: 28–48. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. 2013. The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3): 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. 2015. Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1579–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzubiaga U., Kotlar J., De Massis A., Maseda A., & Iturralde, T. 2018. Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the board of directors. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4): 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. 2001. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1): 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, W. E., Grinstein, A., & Harmancioglu, N. 2016. Whose innovation performance benefits more from external networks: Entrepreneurial or conservative firms?. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 33(1): 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. 1980. Introduction to methodology. In H. Triandis, & J. Berry (Eds.). The handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2: 1–29. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W. 2013. Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, business ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6): 708–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brouthers, K. D., Nakos, G., & Dimitratos, P. 2015. SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(5): 1161–1187.Google Scholar
  10. Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. 2003. The effects of market dynamism on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2): 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Jansen, J. J. P. 2015. CEO social capital and entrepreneurial orientation of the firm bonding and bridging effects. Journal of Management, 41(7): 1957–1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Challagalla, G., Murtha, B. R., & Jaworski, B. 2014. Marketing doctrine: A principles-based approach to guiding marketing decision making in firms. Journal of Marketing, 78(4): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, J., Hung, K., & Lin, M. J. 2014. Knowledge creation and new product performance: The role of creativity. R&D Management, 44(2): 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. C., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. 2012. The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4): 677–702.Google Scholar
  17. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. 2006. Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. 2013. Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(3): 505–537.Google Scholar
  19. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Engelen, A., Kube, H., Schmidt, S., & Flatten, T. C. 2014. Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(8): 1353–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George, B. A., & Marino, L. 2011. The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling, and operationalization. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5): 989–1024.Google Scholar
  22. Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2017. Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hair, J. F. J, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., & Balin, B. J. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  24. Hess, A. M., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2011. When are assets complementary? Star scientists, alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8): 895–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6): 1404–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoskisson, R. E., Covin, J., Volberda, H. W., & Johnson, R. A. 2011. Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6): 1141–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu, C., Tan, K. C., Jayaram, J., & Laosirihongthong, T. 2014. Corporate entrepreneurship, operations core competency and innovation in emerging economies. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18): 5467–5483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57: 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiang, F., Guo, H., Wei, Z., & Wang, D. 2018. The fit between managerial ties and resource bundling capabilities: Implications for performance in manufacturing firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(2): 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. 2014. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5): 1001–1026.Google Scholar
  31. Kreiser, P. M. 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning: The impact of network range and network closure. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5): 1025–1050.Google Scholar
  32. Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. 1990. Measuring non-response bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11(2): 5–25.Google Scholar
  33. Lavie, D., & Drori, I. 2012. Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organization Science, 23(3): 704–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2001. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1123–1134.Google Scholar
  35. Li, L., Jiang, F., Pei, Y., & Jiang, N. 2017. Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success: The contingency role of relational factors. Journal of Business Research, 72: 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, Y., Huang, J., & Tsai, M. 2009. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4): 440–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lomberg, C., Urbig, D., Stӧckmann, C., Marino, L. D., & Dickson, P. H. 2017. Entrepreneurial orientation: The dimensions’ shared effects in explaining firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6): 973–998.Google Scholar
  38. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 735–746.Google Scholar
  40. McFadyen, M. A., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2009. Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3): 552–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firm. Management Science, 29(7): 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. 2014. Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. 2003. The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1: 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3): 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2009. Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 246–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patel, P. C., Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. 2015. Entrepreneurial orientation-as-experimentation and firm performance: The enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 211–224.Google Scholar
  50. Pearce, J. A., II, Fritz, D., & Davis, P. S. 2010. Entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of religious congregations as predicted by rational choice theory. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(1): 219–248.Google Scholar
  51. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 486–501.Google Scholar
  52. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markóczy, L. 2015. Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1): 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pérez-Luño, A., Saparito, P., & Gopalakrishnan, S. 2016. Small and medium-sized enterprise’s entrepreneurial versus market orientation and the creation of tacit knowledge. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1): 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pfeffer, G. R., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  55. Pinkse, J., & Groot, K. 2015. Sustainable entrepreneurship and corporate political activity: Overcoming market barriers in the clean energy sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(3): 633–654.Google Scholar
  56. Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. 2006. Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related?. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4): 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. 2009. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: As assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3): 761–787.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., & Bausch, A. 2013. The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment-performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(3): 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., & Engelen, A. 2014. On cultural and macroeconomic contingencies of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(2): 255–290.Google Scholar
  60. Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. 2011. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shu, C., Page, A., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. 2012. Managerial ties and firm innovation: Is knowledge creation a missing link?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1): 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Veiga, J. J. F. 2010. The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Singh, P. J., Power, D., & Chuong, S. C. 2011. A resource dependency theory perspective of ISO 9000 in managing organizational environment. Journal of Operation Management, 29(1–2): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32: 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. 2014. Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): 152–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Dickson, P. H. 2000. The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 951–973.Google Scholar
  69. Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. 2006. Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weick, K. E., & Westley, F. 1996. Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Welter, F. 2011. Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1): 165–184.Google Scholar
  72. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1307–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configuration approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2011. Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5): 925–946.Google Scholar
  75. Xie, Y., Gao, S., Jiang, X., & Fey, C. 2015. Social ties and indigenous innovation in China’s transition economy: The moderating role of learning. Industry and Innovation, 22(2): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yang, H., & Dess, G. 2007. Where do entrepreneurial orientations come from? An investigation on their social origin. In G. T. Lumpkin, & J. A. Katz (Eds.). Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, vol. 10: 223–247. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  77. Yiu, D., Bruton, G., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practices, 35(2): 293–317.Google Scholar
  80. Zheng, Y., & Yang, H. 2015. Does familiarity foster innovation? The impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2): 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. 2017. State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2): 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhou, K. Z., Zhang, Q., Sheng, S., Xie, E., & Bao, Y. 2014. Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer-supplier exchanges in China. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3): 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M. C. 2015. Board interlocks and firm performance: Toward a combined agency-resource dependence perspective. Journal of Management.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579512.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations