Advertisement

Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms

  • 640 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

This paper explores the different syndication behavior in various types of Chinese venture capitals (VC), in particular it focuses on foreign, private-owned and state-owned VC firms and these firms’ behavior when faced with institutional uncertainties. Mixed methods data analysis was conducted using the Simuton database of 1,173 VC firms and snowball interviews were also conducted in the Chinese state-owned and private-owned VCs as well as foreign VCs. Findings indicate foreign VC investors are more willing to build much denser relationships than those of Chinese state-owned and private VC firms in order to overcome the uncertainty. This result provides additional evidence that adopting close relationships or a guanxi-based (informal social network) strategy does not only depend on cultural issues such as East Asian culture, but also on high institutional uncertainty. Furthermore, this paper develops four propositions on how VC firms establish syndication influenced by high institutional uncertainty. Finally, the conclusion and discussion sections put forward implications to VC companies about how informal social networks facilitate the internationalization process and growth in foreign markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most SOEs are operated by various levels of local governments, rather than the central government.

References

  1. Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. 1994. Robust financial contracting and the role of venture capitalists. Journal of Finance, 49(2): 371–402.

  2. Barabasi, A.-L. 2005. Taming complexity. Nature Physics, 1: 68–70.

  3. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509–513.

  4. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.

  5. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 600–628.

  6. Brander, J. A., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. 2002. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(3): 423–452.

  7. Burt, R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  8. Bygrave, W. D. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2): 139–154.

  9. Bygrave, W. D. 1988. The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2): 137–157.

  10. Chen, H., & Chen, T.-J. 1998. Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 445–467.

  11. Chen, T.-J. 2003. Network resources for internationalization: The case of Taiwan’s electronics firms. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5): 1107–1130.

  12. Chiplin, B., Robbie, K., Wright, M., & others. 1997. The syndication of venture capital deals: Buy-outs and buy-ins. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 21(4): 9–19.

  13. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386–405.

  14. Coleman, J. 1990. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

  15. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31.

  16. Dunning, J. H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 173–190.

  17. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4): 573–593.

  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.

  19. Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G., & Wang, Z. 1992. From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society: A translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an introduction and epilogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  20. Golafshani, N. 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 8(4): 597–607.

  21. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology: 481–510.

  22. Granovetter, M. 1995. The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In A. Portes (Ed.). The economic sociology of immigration: Essays in networks, ethnicity and entrepreneurship: 128–165. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  23. Granovetter, M. 2000. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk4g08q.pdf, Accessed Oct. 7, 2016.

  24. Granovetter, M. 2002. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In M. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.). The new economic sociology: Developents in an emergent field: 35–59. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  25. Granovetter, M. 2017. Society and economy—Framework and principles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  26. Granovetter, M., & Ferrary, M. 2009. The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38(2): 326–359.

  27. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317.

  28. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397–420.

  29. Hemmert, M. 1999. Intermediate organization’revisited: A framework for the vertical division of labor in manufacturing and the case of the Japanese assembly industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(3): 487–517.

  30. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62(1): 251–301.

  31. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2010. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 65(3): 829–859.

  32. Holmstrom, B., 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2): 324–340.

  33. Hsu, F. L. 1963. Clan, caste and club: A comparative study of Chinese, Hindu, and American ways of life. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

  34. Hwang, K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology: 944–974.

  35. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. 2015. Internationalisation in industrial systems—A network approach. In ​M. Forsgren, U. Holm, & J. Johanson (Eds.). Knowledge, networks and power: 111–132. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  36. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.

  37. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  38. Kogut, B., Urso, P., & Walker, G. 2007. Emergent properties of a new financial market: American venture capital syndication, 1960-2005. Management Science, 53(7): 1181–1198.

  39. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. 2001. The syndication of venture capital investments. Omega, 29(5): 375–390.

  40. Lu, H., Trienekens, J. H., Omta, S. W. F., & Feng, S. 2009. The role of guanxi networks in vegetable supply chains: Empirical evidence from PR China. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 21(2): 98–115.

  41. Luo, J.-D., & Cheng, M.-Y. 2015. Guanxi circles’ effect on organizational trust—Bringing power and vertical social exchanges into intra-organizational network analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8): 1024–1037.

  42. Luo, J.-D., Zou, Y., & Guo, R. 2016. Distinction of joint investment propensity of Chinese venture capital. Modern Finance and Economics, 13(4): 1–15 (in Chinese).

  43. Luo, Y. 1997. Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human Systems Management, 16: 43–52.

  44. Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. 1984. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2): 482–501.

  45. Mayer, A., 1966. The significance of quasi-groups in the study of complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.). The antropology of complex societies: 97–122. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.

  46. Ou, C., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. 2014. Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Quarterly, 38(1): 209–230.

  47. Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. 2012. The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  48. Polidoro, F., Ahuja, G., & Mitchell, W. 2011. When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1): 203–223.

  49. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116–145.

  50. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences1. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4): 1132–1205.

  51. Rong, K., Wu, J., Shi, Y., & Guo, L. 2015. Nurturing business ecosystems for growth in a foreign market: Incubating, identifying and integrating stakeholders. Journal of International Management, 21(4): 293–308.

  52. Rowley, T. J., Greve, H. R., Rao, H., Baum, J. A., & Shipilov, A. V. 2005. Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 499–520.

  53. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. 2009. Research methods for business students​, 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

  54. Simon, H. A. 1976. Administrative behavior; A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, 3rd ed. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2015047957, Accessed Oct. 7, 2016.

  55. Small, M. L. 2011. How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1): 57–86.

  56. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2008. Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2): 266–294.

  57. Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. 2000. Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?. London and New York: Routledge.

  58. Stoian, C. 2013. Extending Dunning’s investment development path: The role of home country institutional determinants in explaining outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 22(3): 615–637.

  59. Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. 2010. A research model for guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6): 1195–1212.

  60. Tykvová, T. 2007. Who chooses whom? Syndication, skills and reputation. Review of Financial Economics, 16(1): 5–28.

  61. Vahlne, J.-E., Schweizer, R., & Johanson, J. 2012. Overcoming the liability of outsidership—The challenge of HQ of the global firm. Journal of International Management, 18(3): 224–232.

  62. Williamson, O. E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261.

  63. Williamson, O. E. 1995. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond: 207–256. New York: Oxford University Press.

  64. Williamson, O. E. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

  65. Williamson, O. E., & Winter, S. G. 1993. The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

  66. Wilson, R. 1968. The theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36(1): 119–132.

  67. Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. 1998. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1): 165–194.

  68. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129–166.

  69. Yin, R., 2008. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

  70. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support of Center for Social Network Research, Tsinghua University and Tsinghua’s research project “Trust and Guanxi Studies on Internet,” Project No. 20121088015, as well as the support of Chinese Natural Science Foundation Project “Social Network in Big Data Analysis: A Case in Investment Network,” Project No. 71372053 and 71402051, and National 863 Project No. 20141860074.

Author information

Correspondence to Ke Rong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, J., Rong, K., Yang, K. et al. Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms. Asia Pac J Manag 36, 499–527 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9561-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Guanxi (informal social network)
  • Venture capital (VC)
  • Syndication
  • Liability of foreignness
  • State-owned
  • Social embeddedness