The science and practice of international business is advanced through scholarly contribution to the leading international business journals. Increased competition among academic institutions has led to increased emphasis on publication in the leading international business journals. Yet, little is known as to the answers to questions such as: (1) Who are the most prolific authors in the leading international business journals? and (2) Which educational institutions appear poised to lead international business scholarship? To examine these questions, the study examines scholarly work in international business over the past eleven years in six leading international business journals (i.e., Journal of International Business Studies, Management International Review, Journal of World Business, International Marketing Review, Journal of International Marketing, and International Business Review). Addressing these two research questions provides us with a more complete understanding of the authors and institutions most likely to influence the field of international business.
International business scholarship Prolific authors Leading schools
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Chan, K.C., Fung, H., & Lai, P. 2005. Membership of editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, F. L., & Reeb, D. M. 2000. Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31: 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, D. A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Xu, S. 2008. Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, (in press).Google Scholar
Inkpen, A.C., & Beamish, P. W. 1994. An analysis of twenty-five years of research in the Journal of International Business Studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. 2004. Ranking the international business schools: Faculty publication as the measure. Management International Review, 44: 213–228.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27: 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2006. Most cited authors and articles in global strategy research. Journal of International Management, 12: 490–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleggenkuhle, E. G., Aroul, R. R., Sun, S. L., & Su, Y. 2007. The adolescence of Asia management research: APJM, 1997–2006. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quer, D., Claver, E., & Rienda, L. 2007. Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trieschmann, J. S., Dennis, A. R., Northcraft, G. R., & Niemi, A. W. 2000. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1130–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar