Advertisement

Applied Intelligence

, Volume 49, Issue 12, pp 4175–4188 | Cite as

Discovering varying patterns of Normal and interleaved ADLs in smart homes

  • Mahsa Raeiszadeh
  • Hooman TahayoriEmail author
  • Andrea Visconti
Article

Abstract

People may do the same activity in many different ways hence, modeling and recognizing that activity based on data gathered through simple sensors like motion sensor is a complex task. In this paper, we propose an approach for activity mining and activity tracking which identifies frequent normal and interleaved activities that individuals perform. With this capability, we can track the occurrence of regular activities to monitor users and detect changes in an individual’s behavioral pattern and lifestyle. We have tested the proposed method using the datasets of Washington State University CASAS and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) smart home projects. The obtained results show considerable improvements compared with existing methods.

Keywords

Smart home Activity mining Normal and interleaved ADLs 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Raeiszadeh M, Tahayori H (2018) “A novel method for detecting and predicting resident’s behavior in smart home,” 6th Iran. Jt. Congr. Fuzzy Intell. Syst., p. 71–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahya P, Tahayori H, Sadeghian A (2017) “An online demand response EMS with anomaly usage detection,” 5th IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Energy Grid Eng., pp. 271–275Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liouane Z, Lemlouma T, Roose P, Weis F, Messaoud H (2017) An improved extreme learning machine model for the prediction of human scenarios in smart homes. Springer J Appl Intell 48(8):2017–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mshali H, Lemlouma T, Moloney M, Magoni D (2018) A survey on health monitoring systems for health smart homes. Int J Ind Ergon 66:26–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Munoz A, Augusto JC, Villa A, Botia JA (2011) Design and evaluation of an ambient assisted living system based on an argumentative multi-agent system. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 15(4):377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rashidi P, Cook DJ (2009) Keeping the resident in the loop: adapting the smart home to the user. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybern Part ASystems Humans 39(5):949–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tapia EM, Intille SS, Larson K (2004) Activity recognisation in home using simple state changing sensors. Pervasive Comput 3001:158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Kasteren T, Krose B (2007) Bayesian activity recognition in residence for elders. In: 3rd IET Int. Conf. Intell. Environ. (IE 07), vol 2007, pp 209–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brdiczka O, Crowley JL (2016) Learning situation models in a smart home learning situation models in a smart home. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part ASystems Humans 39(1):56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lombriser C, Bharatula NB, Roggen D, Tröster G (2007) “On-body activity recognition in a dynamic sensor network,” Proc. ICST 2nd Int. Conf. Body area networks, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allahviranloo M, Recker W (2013) Daily activity pattern recognition by using support vector machines with multiple classes. Transp Res Part B 58:16–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehr HD, Polat H, Cetin A (2016) Resident activity recognition in smart homes by using artificial neural networks, 4th Int. Istanbul Smart Grid Congr. FairGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Favela J, Tentori M, Castro LA, Gonzalez VM, Moran EB, Martinez-Garcia AI (2007) Activity recognition for context-aware hospital applications: issues and opportunities for the deployment of pervasive networks. Mob Networks Appl 12(2–3):155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maurer U, Smailagic A, Siewiorek DP, Deisher M (2006) “Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions,” Int Work Wearable Implant Body Sens Networks, pp. 4–7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singla G, Cook DJ (2009) Interleaved activity recognition for smart home residents, 5th IEEE Int. Conf. Intelliget environ., pp. 145–152Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alam MR, Reaz MBI, Mohd Ali MA (2012) SPEED: an inhabitant activity prediction algorithm for smart homes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part ASystems Humans 42(4):985–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liao L, Fox D, Kautz H (2005) Location-based activity recognition using relational Markov networks, 19th Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell., pp. 773–778Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jakkula VR, Cook DJ (2007) “Using temporal relations in smart environment data for activity prediction,” 24th Int. Conf. Mach. LearnGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rashidi P, Cook DJ, Holder LB, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2011) Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 23(4):527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bourobou STM, Yoo Y (2015) User activity recognition in smart homes using pattern clustering applied to temporal ANN algorithm. Sensors (Switzerland) 15(5):11953–11971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riabov A, Liu ZLZ, Wolf JL, Yu PS, Zhang LZL (2003) “Clustering algorithms for content-based publication-subscription systems,” 23rd Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst. 2003. Proceedings., pp. 133–142Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rashidi P, Cook DJ (2009) Transferring learned activities in smart environments. Ambient Intell Smart Environ Intell Environ 2:185–192Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olivier MS, Tillwick HM, Venter HS, Africa S (2005) Using self-organizing maps for anomalous behavior detection in a computer forensic investigation, Inf. Comput. Secur. Archit. Res. GrGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao Z, Yan D, Ng W (2014) Mining probabilistically frequent sequential patterns in large uncertain databases. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(5):1171–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pei J, Han J, Chen Q, Hsu MC, Mortazavi-Asl B, Pinto H (2001) “PrefixSpan: mining sequential patterns efficiently by prefix-projected pattern growth,” Int. Conf. Data Eng., pp. 215–224Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kotal KKSA (2013) A new algorithm to find longest common sub-sequences. Int J Sci c Eng Res 4(5):664–669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & Engineering and IT, School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversita degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations