Advertisement

Applied Intelligence

, Volume 49, Issue 12, pp 4058–4096 | Cite as

Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition

  • Xindong PengEmail author
  • Harish Garg
Article

Abstract

Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), characterized by membership degrees and non-membership degrees, are a more effective and flexible way than intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) to capture indeterminacy. In this paper, some new diverse types of similarity measures, overcoming the blemishes of the existing similarity measures, for PFSs with multiple parameters are studied, along with their detailed proofs. The various desirable properties among the developed similarity measures and distance measures have also been derived. A comparison between the proposed and the existing similarity measures has been performed in terms of the division by zero problem, unsatisfied similarity axiom conditions, and counter-intuitive cases for showing their effectiveness and feasibility. The initiated similarity measures have been illustrated with case studies of pattern recognition, along with the effect of the different parameters on the ordering and classification of the patterns.

Keywords

Pythagorean fuzzy sets Similarity measures Distance measures Pattern recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very appreciative to the reviewers for their precious comments which enormously ameliorated the quality of this paper. Our work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61462019), MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 18YJCZH054), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030307033, 2018A0303130274), Social Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. GD18CFX06).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication for the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li Y, Olson DL, Qin Z (2007) Similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy (vague) sets: a comparative analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(2):278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen SM (1997) Similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 27(1):153–158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen SM, Chang CH (2015) A novel similarity measure between Atanssov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 291:96–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recognit Lett 25(14):1603–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hong DH, Kim C (1999) A note on similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. Inf Sci 115(1-4):83–96MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li DF, Cheng CT (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognit Lett 23(1-3):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li F, Xu ZY (2001) Measures of similarity between vague sets. J Softw 12(6):922–927Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liang ZZ, Shi PF (2003) Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 24 (15):2687–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfeng-Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(16):3101–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(1-2):91–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garg H (2019) A hybrid GSA-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Inf Sci 478:499–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng XD, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng XD, Selvachandran G (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9596-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng XD, Yang Y (2016) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):444–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang C, Li D, Ren R (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy multigranulation rough set over two universes and its applications in merger and acquisition. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):921–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peng XD, Yang Y (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set. Comput Eng Appl 52(23):50–54Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu ZM, Liu PD, Liu WL, Pang JY (2017) Pythagorean uncertain linguistic partitioned bonferroni mean operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(3):2779–2790MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liang DC, Xu ZS (2017) The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 60:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng XD, Yang Y, Song J, Jiang Y (2015) Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application. Comput Eng 41(7):224–229Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhan J, Sun B (2018) Covering-based intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets and applications in multi-attribute decision-making. Artif Intell Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9674-7, 2018
  25. 25.
    Peng HG, Wang JQ (2018) A multicriteria group decision-making method based on the normal cloud model with Zadeh’s Z-numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:3246–3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen TY (2019) Multiple criteria decision analysis under complex uncertainty: a pearson-like correlation-based Pythagorean fuzzy compromise approach. Int J Intell Syst 34(1):114–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang W, Pang Y (2018) New Pythagorean fuzzy interaction Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:39241–39260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng XD, Li WQ (2019) Algorithms for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. IEEE Access 7:7419–7441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang Y, Ding H, Chen ZS, Li YL (2016) A note on extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 31(1):68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):634–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li DQ, Zeng WY, Qian Y (2017) Distance measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in multiattribute decision making. Control Decis 32(10):1817–1823zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(6):593–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeng W, Li D, Yin Q (2018) Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(11):2236–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peng X, Yuan H, Yang Y (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 32(10):991–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang HH, Liang Y (2018) Hybrid L1/2 + 2 method for gene selection in the Cox proportional hazards model. Comput Meth Prog Bio 164:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li DQ, Zeng WY (2018) Distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):348–361MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peng X (2018) New similarity measure and distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy set. Complex Intell Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0084-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grzegorzewski P (2004) Distance between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets Syst 148(2):319–328MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boran FE, Akay D (2014) A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 255:45–57MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Sciences and EngineeringShaoguan UniversityShaoguanChina
  2. 2.School of Mathematics, Thapar Institute of Engineering & TechnologyDeemed UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations