Advertisement

Applied Intelligence

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 449–462 | Cite as

Bibliometric analysis on the evolution of applied intelligence

  • Dejian Yu
  • Zeshui XuEmail author
  • Hamido Fujita
Article

Abstract

The Applied Intelligence (APIN) published its first issue in 1991 and it is one of the important academic journals in the field of computer science. This study aims to examine the structure and citation landscape as well as the evolution of the APIN journal based on all the APIN articles included in web of science core collection database. Research results of this study including the author characteristics, manuscript characteristics, productive and influential institutions and countries. Various kinds of networks are provided to visualize the complex relationships from different perspectives, including institutions and countries. The co-occurrence network and detection of the bursting keywords are used to explore the research hotspots in the APIN journal. The main advantage of this study is that it provides a comprehensive and objective view of the APIN journal. This study is very helpful for scholars to grasp the content structure and development process of APIN journal. It is also valuable for scholars in the field of artificial intelligence to identify the research hotspots in this field.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis Citation structure Applied intelligence Keywords co-occurrence Burst detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project of philosophy and Social Science in Zhejiang (No. 16NDJC159YB), the China National Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 71771155, 71571123), the Zhejiang Science & Technology Plan of China (No. 2015C33024), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY17G010007).

References

  1. 1.
    Aha DW, Breslow LA, Muñoz-Avila H (2001) Conversational case-based reasoning. Appl Intell 14(1):9–32CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2007) What do we know about the h index? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58 (9):1381–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bornmann L, Mutz R (2015) Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66(11):2215–2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyack KW, Klavans R (2010) Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(12):2389–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brest J, Maučec MS (2008) Population size reduction for the differential evolution algorithm. Appl Intell 29(3):228–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burke E, Cowling P, De Causmaecker P, Berghe GV (2001) A memetic approach to the nurse rostering problem. Appl Intell 15(3):199–214CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calma A, Davies M (2015) Studies in higher education 1976–2013: a retrospective using citation network analysis. Stud High Educ 40(1):4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calma A, Davies M (2016) Academy of management journal, 1958–2014: a citation analysis. Scientometrics 108(2):959–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan KC, Chang CH, Lo YL (2009) A retrospective evaluation of European financial management (1995–2008). Europ Financ Manag 15(3):676–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen C, Song IY, Yuan X, Zhang J (2008) The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007). Data Knowl Eng 67(2):234–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen MY, Jenkins CB, Elster AD (2003) Internationalization of the American journal of roentgenology: 1980–2002. Amer J Roentgenol 181(4):907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen SJ, Chen SM (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Intell 26(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cronin B, Meho L (2006) Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57(9):1275–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng Y (2015) Generalized evidence theory. Appl Intell 43(3):530–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diederich J, Kindermann J, Leopold E, Paass G (2003) Authorship attribution with support vector machines. Appl Intell 19(1-2):109–123CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubois D, Fargier H, Prade H (1996) Possibility theory in constraint satisfaction problems: handling priority, preference and uncertainty. Appl Intell 6(4):287–309CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eito-Brun R, Rodríguez ML (2016) 50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (ESA). Scientometrics 109(1):551–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feng Y, Zhu Q, Lai KH (2017) Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 158:296–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferreira FA (2018) Mapping the field of arts-based management: bibliographic coupling and co-citation analyses. J Bus Res 85:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foy JP, Bertolus C, Goudot P, Deneuve S, Blanc E, Lasset C, Saintigny P (2018) Bibliometric analysis of a century of research on oral erythroplakia and leukoplakia. J Oral Pathol Med 47(4):388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    García-Lillo F, Úbeda-García M, Marco-Lajara B (2016) The intellectual structure of research in hospitality management: a literature review using bibliometric methods of the journal International. J Hospital Manag Int J Hospit Manag 52:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ji L, Liu C, Huang L, Huang G (2018) The evolution of resources conservation and recycling over the past 30 years: a bibliometric overview. Resour Conserv Recycl 134:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim MC, Chen C (2015) A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics 104(1):239–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Amer Documen 14(1):10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He XR, Wu YY, Yu DJ, Merigó JM (2017) Exploring the ordered weighted averaging operator knowledge domain: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Intell Syst 32(11):1151–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102 (46):16569–16572CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirsch JE (2007) Does the h index have predictive power?. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(49):19193–19198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kononenko I, Šimec E, Robnik-Šikonja M (1997) Overcoming the myopia of inductive learning algorithms with RELIEFF. Appl Intell 7(1):39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Laengle S, Merigó JM, Miranda J, Sowiński R, Bomze I, Borgonovo E, Teunter R (2017) Forty years of the European journal of operational research: a bibliometric overview. Eur J Oper Res 262(3):803–816CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laengle S, Modak NM, Merigo JM, Zurita G (2018) Twenty-five years of group decision and negotiation: a bibliometric overview. Group Decis Negot 27(4):505–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li X, Wu P, Shen GQ, Wang X, Teng Y (2017) Mapping the knowledge domains of building information modeling (BIM): a bibliometric approach. Autom Constr 84:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu RL (2017) A new bibliographic coupling measure with descriptive capability. Scientometrics 110(2):915–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martínez-López FJ, Merigó JM, Valenzuela-Fernández L, Nicolás C (2018) Fifty years of the European J Market bibliometric analysis. European J Market 52(1/2):439–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mazov NA, Gureev VN (2017) Bibliometric analysis of the flow of publications by Novosibirsk State University in collaboration with the RAS Siberian Branch. Her Russ Acad Sci 87(5):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Merigó JM, Blanco–Mesa F, Gil–Lafuente AM, Yager RR (2017) Thirty years of the international journal of intelligent systems: a bibliometric review international. J Intell Syst 32(5):526–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Merigó JM, Mas-Tur A, Roig-Tierno N, Ribeiro-Soriano D (2015) A bibliometric overview of the journal of business research between 1973 and 2014. J Business Res 68(12):2645–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Merigó JM, Pedrycz W, Weber R, De la Sotta C (2018) Fifty years of information sciences: a bibliometric overview. Inform Sci 432:245–268MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Merigó JM, Yang JB (2017) A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega 73:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nagarajan R, Teixeira AA, Silva S (2017) The impact of population ageing on economic growth: a bibliometric survey. Singapore Econ Rev 62(2):275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nederhof AJ (2006) Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics 66(1):81–100MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ombuki B, Ross BJ, Hanshar F (2006) Multi-objective genetic algorithms for vehicle routing problem with time windows. Appl Intell 24(1):17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paschen J, Wilson M, Nehajowich J, Prpić J (2016) Fine wine through time: a review of the. J Wine Res J Wine Res 27(2):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Qasim M (2017) Sustainability and wellbeing: a scientometric and bibliometric review of the literature. J Econ Surv 31(4):1035–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schaal S, Atkeson CG, Vijayakumar S (2002) Scalable techniques from nonparametric statistics for real time robot learning. Appl Intell 17(1):49–60CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Şenel E, Demir E (2018) Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the articles published in the journal of religion and health between 1975 and 2016. J Relig Health 57(4):1473–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shekhani HN, Shariff S, Bhulani N, Khosa F, Hanna TN (2017) Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: a comparison of six major radiology journals. Am J Roentgenol 209(6):1191–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tal D, Gordon A (2018) Women as political leaders: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Society 55(3):256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tur-Porcar A, Mas-Tur A, Merigó JM, Roig-Tierno N, Watt J (2018) A bibliometric history of the journal of psychology between 1936 and 2015. J Psychol 152(4):199–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Van Fleet DD, Ray DF, Bedeian AG, Downey HK, Hunt JG, Griffin RW, Feldman DC (2006) The journal of management’s first 30 years. J Manag 32(4):477–506Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang WR, Laengle S, Merigó JM, Yu DJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Cobo MJ, Bouchon-Meunier B (2018) A bibliometric analysis of the first twenty-five years of the international journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems. Int J Uncert Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 26(02):169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yu DJ (2015) A scientometrics review on aggregation operator research. Scientometrics 105(1):115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yu DJ, Xu C (2017) Mapping research on carbon emissions trading: a co-citation analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:1314–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Pedrycz W, Wang WR (2017) Information sciences 1968–2016: a retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Inf Sci 418:619–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Wang WR (2018) Bibliometric analysis of fuzzy theory research in China: A 30-year perspective. Knowl-Based Syst 141:188–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Kao Y, Lin CT (2018) The structure and citation landscape of IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems (1994–2015). IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang Y, Chen H, Lu J, Zhang G (2017) Detecting and predicting the topic change of knowledge-based systems: a topic-based bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2016. Knowl-Based Syst 133:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolNanjing Audit UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.School of Computer and SoftwareNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  4. 4.Faculty of Software and Information ScienceIwate Prefectural UniversityIwateJapan

Personalised recommendations