Mixed Methods Analysis of Implementation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) for Major Depressive Disorder in Prisons in a Hybrid Type I Randomized Trial
This article describes a mixed methods evaluation of implementation of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in the first fully-powered trial of any treatment for major depressive disorder in an incarcerated population. Assessments in this Hybrid Type I trial included surveys of prison providers and administrators (n = 71), measures of feasibility and acceptability to prison patients (n = 90), and a planned document review (n = 460) to assess potential determinants of implementation. Quantitative and qualitative results indicated that IPT was a good fit for prisoners, and that prisoners and providers were enthusiastic about IPT. Providers were open to feedback, open to learning evidence-based practices, and committed to helping their clients. Limited treatment staff and variable supervision and collegial support may pose implementation challenges. For widespread prison implementation, scalable models for ongoing IPT training and supervision are needed.
KeywordsImplementation science Prisons Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) Major depressive disorder Group psychotherapy
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH095230; Johnson, Principal Investigator). We would also like to acknowledge Marlanea Peabody, Collette Williams, Jen Kao, and Karen Fernandes, who helped to collect the data, and Dr. Jessica Nargiso who provided study supervision and kept process notes.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to report.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Brown University’s Institutional Review Board (FWA 00004460), the regulatory bodies overseeing prison research in participating states, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bolton, P., Bass, J., Neugebauer, R., Verdeli, H., Clougherty, K. F., Wickramaratne, P., et al. (2003). Group interpersonal psychotherapy for depression in rural Uganda: A randomized controlled trail. Journal of the American Medical Association,289(23), 3117–3124. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curran, G., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care,50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science,4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elkin, I., Shea, M. T., Watkins, J. T., Imber, S. D., et al. (1989). National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: General effectiveness of treatments. Archives of General Psychiatry,46, 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herschell, A., Kolko, D. J., Baumann, B. L., & Davis, A. C. (2010). The role of therapist training in the implementation of psychosocial treatments: A review and critique with recommendations. Clinical Psychology Review,30(4), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- James, D., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 213600. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf.
- Johnson, J. E., Miller, T., Stout, R. L., Zlotnick, C., Cerbo, L. A., Andrade, J. T., et al. (2016). Study protocol: Hybrid Type I cost-effectiveness and implementation study of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for men and women prisoners with major depression. Contemporary Clinical Trials,47, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, J. E., Stout, R. L., Miller, T. R., Zlotnick, C., Cerbo, L. A., Andrade, J. T., et al. (2019). Randomized effectiveness trial of group interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for prisoners with major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,87(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, J. E., Williams, C., & Zlotnick, C. (2015). Development and feasibility of a cell phone-based transitional intervention for women prisoners with comorbid substance use and depression. The Prison Journal,95(3), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515587466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaeble, D., & Cowhig, M. (2018). Correctional populations in the United States, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 251211. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus16.pdf.
- Mor Barak, M. E., Nissley, J. A., & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and meta-analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,39, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/323166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palinkas, L., Aarons, G., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2010). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,38(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy In Mental Health,38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoenwald, S., Chapman, J. E., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Landsverk, J., Stevens, J., et al. (2008). A survey of the infrastructure for children’s mental health services: Implications for the implementation of empirically supported treatments (ESTs). Adminatration and Policy in Mental Health,35, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0147-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spillane, J., Pareja, A., Dorner, L., Barnes, C., May, H., Huff, J., et al. (2010). Mixing methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Validation, contextualization, triangulation, and control. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability,22(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9089-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance,4(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
- Taxman, F. S., Young, D. W., Wiersema, B., Rhodes, A., & Mitchell, S. (2007). The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices survey: Multilevel survey methods and procedures. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,32, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.01.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- University of New Mexico (2019). Project ECHO: A revolution in medical education and care delivery. Retrieved September 3, 2019, from https://echo.unm.edu/.