The Policy Ecology of Behavioral Health Homes: Case Study of Maryland’s Medicaid Health Home Program
Behavioral health homes, shown to improve receipt of evidence-based medical services among people with serious mental illness in randomized clinical trials, have had limited results in real-world settings; nonetheless, these programs are spreading rapidly. To date, no studies have considered what set of policies is needed to support effective implementation of these programs. As a first step toward identifying an optimal set of policies to support behavioral health home implementation, we use the policy ecology framework to map the policies surrounding Maryland’s Medicaid behavioral health home program. Results suggest that existing policies fail to address important implementation barriers.
KeywordsBehavioral health home Integrated care Serious mental illness Healthcare policy
NIMH K01MH106631 (PI: McGinty) and NIMH R24MH102822 (PI: Daumit).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bandara, S. N., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Stuart, E. A., et al. (under review). The effect of the Maryland Medicaid Health Home Waiver on Emergency Department and Inpatient Utilization Among Individuals with Serious Mental Illness.Google Scholar
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2018a). Health Homes. Retrieved September 9, 2018, from https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/ltss/health-homes/index.html.
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2018b). Promoting Interoperability. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHrIncentivePrograms/.
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2018c). State-by-State Health Home State Plan Amendment Matrix. Retrieved September 23, 2018, from https://www.medicaid.gov/state-resource-center/medicaid-state-technical-assistance/health-home-information-resource-center/downloads/state-hh-spa-at-a-glance-matrix.pdf.
- Correll, C. U., Solmi, M., Veronese, N., et al. (2017). Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: A large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls. World Psychiatry, 16(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Druss, B. G., von Esenwein, S. A., Glick, G. E., et al. (2017). Randomized Trial of an Integrated Behavioral Health Home: The Health Outcomes Management and Evaluation (HOME) Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maryland Department of Health. (2018). Maryland Chronic Health Homes. Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://mmcp.health.maryland.gov/Pages/Health-Homes.aspx.
- Massechusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services. (2018). MassHealth Medicaid Section 1115 Demonstration. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2018/06/27/1115%20MassHealth%20Demonstration%20STC%206-27-18.pdf¸.
- McGinty, E. E., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Linden, S., et al. (2018). An innovative model to coordinate healthcare and social services for people with serious mental illness: A mixed-methods case study of Maryland’s Medicaid health home program. General Hospital Psychiatry, 51, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McGinty E. E., Stone E. M., Kennedy-Hendricks A., et al. (under review). The effect of the Maryland Medicaid Health Home Waiver on Quality of Care for Diabetes and Cardiovascular disease among individuals with serious mental illness.Google Scholar
- Missouri Department of Health. (2017). Missouri CMHC Healthcare Homes: Progress Report 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://dmh.mo.gov/mentalillness/docs/cmhchch2016report.pdf.
- Murphy K., Daumit G. L., Stone E. M., et al. (under review) Effect of the Maryland Medicaid Behavioral Health Home Program on Cancer Screening in People with Serious Mental Illness.Google Scholar
- North Carolina Health Information Exchange Authority. (2018). About the NC HIEA. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://hiea.nc.gov/about-us/about-nc-hiea.
- Ohio Departmet of Medicaid. (2015). Health Homes Performance Measures: Comprehensive Evaluation Report. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://mha.ohio.gov/Portals/0/assets/Initiatives/HealthHomes/OH-SFY2015_O2A-Health-Homes-Performance-Measures_FINAL.pdf.
- Parks, J., Svendsen, D., Singer, P., et al. (2006). Morbidity and mortality in people with serious mental illness. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council, 25(4), 1–87.Google Scholar
- Scharf, D. M., Breslau, J., Hackbarth, N. S., et al. (2014a). An examination of New York State’s integrated primary and mental health care services for adults with serious mental illness. Rand Health Quarterly, 4, 3.Google Scholar
- Scharf, D. M., Eberhart, N. K., Hackbarth, N. S., et al. (2014b). Evaluation of the SAMHSA primary and behavioral health care integration (PBHCI) grant program. Rand Health Quarterly, 4, 6.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2016). SAMHSA PBHCI Grantees by HHS Regions. Retrieved December 11, 2018, from https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/SAMHSA_PBHCI_Grantees_Cohort_I-IX.pdf.
- The Code of Maryland Regulations. (2018). Health Homes. Retrieved September 26, 2018, from http://www.dsd.state.md.us/comar/SubtitleSearch.aspx?search=10.09.33.
- The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. (2018). Core Treatment Program Standards—Health Home (HH). Behavioral Health Standards Manual., 42, 23.Google Scholar
- The Joint Commission. (2018). Behavioral Health Home Certification. Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://www.jointcommission.org/accreditation/behavioral_health_home.aspx.
- Ubbink, D. T., Guyatt, G. H., & Vermeulen, H. (2013). Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: A systematic scoping review. British Medical Journal Open, 3(1), e001881.Google Scholar