Managing and Adapting Practice: Provider Perceptions of an Evidence-Informed Framework for Delivering Mental Health Services
This study examined providers’ reflections on delivering managing and adapting practice (MAP), an evidence-informed framework that guides decision-making from scientific and client data. Consensual qualitative research methods were used to analyze the reflections of 201 youth mental health providers. Results indicated that providers approached MAP according to their own preferences and particular cases. While most appeared to approach MAP from a practice management standpoint, when faced with challenging cases, providers used coordination and outcomes management resources. Regardless of approach, most providers came to appreciate the full framework through reflective practice. Their diverse approaches offer lessons for evidence-based practice implementation and sustainment.
KeywordsEvidence-based service delivery Reflective practice Implementation Community mental health
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
Bruce F. Chorpita is President and Eric L. Daleiden is Chief Operating Officer of PracticeWise, LLC, a private behavioral health consulting corporation. Kimberly D. Becker is a consultant to PracticeWise, LLC.
The University of South Carolina’s Institutional Review Board determined that this study was exempt from review.
This study was conducted on already available data for which formal consent was not needed due to the nature of data collected.
- Becker, K. D., Lee, B., Daleiden, E., Lindsey, M., Brandt, N., & Chorpita, B. (2015). The common elements of engagement in children’s mental health: Which elements for which outcomes? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.814543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burchard, J. D., Bruns, E. J., & Burchard, S. N. (2002). The wraparound process. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community-based treatment for youth (pp. 66–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chorpita, B. F., Bernstein, A. D., Daleiden, E. L., & the Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2008). Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edmunds, M. (1997). Managing managed care: Quality improvements in behavioral health. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Ferreira, J. F., Basseches, M., & Vasco, A. B. (2017). Guidelines for reflective practice in psychotherapy: A reflection on the benefits of combining moment-by-moment and phase-by-phase mapping in clinical decision making. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 27, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malone, T. W., Lai, K., & Grant, K. R. (2001). Two design principles for collaboration technology: Examples of semiformal systems and radical tailorability. In G. M. Olson, T. W. Malone, & J. B. Smith (Eds.), Coordination theory and collaboration technology (pp. 125–160). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mennen, F. E., Cederbaum, J., Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K., Lopez, O., & Sela-Amit, M. (2018). The large-scale implementation of evidence-informed practice into a specialized MSW curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 54, S56–S64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1434440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reding, M. E. J., Chorpita, B. F., Lau, A. S., & Innes-Gomberg, D. (2014). Providers’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Is it just about providers, or do practices matter, too? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41, 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0525-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez, A., Lau, A. S., Wright, B., Regan, J., & Brookman-Frazee, L. (2018). Mixed-method analysis of program leader perspectives on the sustainment of multiple child evidence-based practices in a system-driven implementation. Implementation Science, 13, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0737-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Southam-Gerow, M. A., Daleiden, E. L., Chorpita, B. F., Bae, C., Mitchell, C., Faye, M., et al. (2014). MAPping Los Angeles County: Taking an evidence-informed model of mental health care to scale. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.833098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J. (2012). Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: Tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar