The Perceived Impact of Sequential Intercept Mapping on Communities Collaborating to Address Adults with Mental Illness in the Criminal Justice System
- 21 Downloads
Sequential intercept mapping is an approach to address the overrepresentation of adults with mental illness in the criminal justice system. This approach follows the sequential intercept model, a nationally recognized framework conceptualizing the linear movement of people with mental illness through the criminal justice system. During the sequential intercept mapping process, community stakeholders identify service and policy gaps and opportunities to address the needs of this target population. This qualitative study describes the perceived impact of sequential intercept mapping among community stakeholders. Sequential intercept mapping appears to be well-received, with the potential to improve collaboration and enhance community policy and practices.
KeywordsSequential intercept model Sequential intercept mapping Cross-systems collaboration Jail diversion
Earlier versions of this work were presented at the American Psychology-Law Society’s annual conference in March 2018 and the American Public Health Association’s annual conference in November 2017. The authors would like to thank Katherine Pawlicki and Andrew Skrinyer for their participation in data transcription and coding, and Mark R. Munetz for his review and comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
This study was funded by a Justice Mental Health Collaboration Program expansion grant (Grant Number 2015-MO-BX-0020) awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance through the Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services (Mark R. Munetz, MD, Principal Investigator).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board at Northeast Ohio Medical University approved this study (protocol #16-025).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baillargeon, J., Penn, J. V., Knight, K., Harzke, A. J., Baillargeon, G., & Becker, E. A. (2010). Risk of reincarceration among prisoners with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-009-0252-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Special report: Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Publication No. NCJ 213600. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2017). Special report: Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12. Publication No. NCJ 250612. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Criminal Justice Coordinating Center of Excellence. (2018). Sequential intercept model. Retrieved July 13, 2018 from https://www.neomed.edu/cjccoe/sequential-intercept-mapping/.
- Garson, G.D. (2016). Validity and reliability. In: Statistical Associates Blue Book Series. Asheboro: Statistical Associates PublishingGoogle Scholar
- Metzger, L., Ahalt, C., Kushel, M., Riker, A., & Williams, B. (2018). Mobilizing cross-sector community partnerships to address the needs of criminal justice-involved older adults: A framework for action. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 13(3–4), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-05-2017-0024.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Ohio Development Services Agency. (2018). Metropolitan statistical area map. Retrieved May 16, 2018 from https://development.ohio.gov/reports/reports_ohio_statistical_areas.htm
- Osher, F., D’Amora, D. A., Plotkin, M., Jarrett, N., & Eggleston, A. (2012). Adults with behavioral health needs under correctional supervision: A shared framework for reducing recidivism and promoting recovery. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.Google Scholar
- Pinals, D. (2010). Veterans and the justice system: The next forensic frontier. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 38(2), 163–167.Google Scholar
- Silverman, B., Champney, J., Steber, S., & Zubritsky, C. (2015). Collaborating for consensus: Considerations for convening coalition stakeholders to promote a gender-based approach to addressing the health needs of sex workers. Evaluation and Program Planning, 51, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2013). Creating a trauma-informed criminal justice system for women: Why and how. US Department of Health and Human Services. Report no. NCJ241427. Rockville.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2015). Screening and assessment of co-occurring disorders in the justice system. Publication No. (SMA)-15-4930. US Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville.Google Scholar
- Twenty-First Century Cures Act of 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-255, Subtitle B, § 14021 (2016).Google Scholar
- Vogel, W. M., Noether, C. D., & Steadman, H. J. (2007). Preparing communities for re-entry of offenders with mental illness: the ACTION approach. Pp. 167-188 in Mental Health Issues in the Criminal Justice System. The Hawthorn Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1300/j076v45n01_12