What Makes Research Useful for Public School Educators?
In this study, we explored the extent to which educators discuss and prioritize Rogers’ (Diffusion of innovations, The Free Press: New York, 1995) five attributes of innovations—relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, observability, and trialability—in the context of research use. Using a directed content analysis of 54 semi-structured interviews and exemplar quotes, we describe how educators mentioned compatibility most frequently, but also commonly invoked observability and complexity in their discussions of research use. Our results also revealed key differences between educators in executive and non-executive roles. We discuss the implications of our findings for closing the research-practice gap in school-based mental health services and psychosocial interventions.
KeywordsDiffusion Innovation Research use Districts Schools Directed content analysis
This study was funded by Officer’s Research Award (#182241) and a Use of Research Evidence Award (#183010) from the William T. Grant Foundation. Additional support for this research also came from an R21 research grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (#1R21MH100238-01A1).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors of this manuscript (i.e., Jennifer Watling Neal, Zachary P. Neal, Jennifer A. Lawlor, Kristen J. Mills, and Kathryn McAlindon) declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This research was approved by Michigan State University’s IRB (#x12-1011e, #x14-706e, #x14-1173e).
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Atkins, M. S., Hoagwood, K. E., Kutash, K., & Seidman, E. (2010). Toward the integration of education and mental health in schools. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0299-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Atkins, M. S., & Lakind, D. (2013). Usual care for clinicians, unusual care for their clients: Rearranging priorities for children’s mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40, 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0453-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Behrstock-Sherratt, E., Drill, K., & Miller, S. (2011). Is the supply in demand? Exploring how, when and why teachers use research (revised Ed). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
- Cappella, E., Frazier, S. L., Atkins, M. S., Schoenwald, S. K., & Glisson, C. (2008). Enhancing schools’ capacity to support children in poverty: An ecological model of school-based mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0182-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (2009). What is the evidence on districts’ use of evidence? In J. D. Bransford, D. J. Stipek, N. J. Vye, L. M. Gomez & D. Lam (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (pp. 67–86). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.Google Scholar
- Cook, B. G., Smith, G. J., & Tankersley, M. (2012). Evidence-based practice in education. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 493–525). Washington DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Cousins, J. B., & Leithwood, K. A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 14, 305–333.Google Scholar
- Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. A. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systematic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Special Issue, 25–52.Google Scholar
- Curtis, J. R., Wenrich, M. D., Carline, J. D., Shannon, S. E., Ambrozy, D. M., & Ramsey, P. G. (2001). Understanding physicians’ skills at providing end-of-life care: Perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00333.x.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) 2015, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq. (U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2015).Google Scholar
- Finnigan, K. S., Daly, A. J., & Che, J. (2013). Systemwide reform in districts under pressure: The role of social networks in defining, acquiring, using, and diffusing research evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kena, G., Hussar, W., McFarland, J., de Brey, C., Musu-Gillette, L., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Diliberti, M., Barmer, A., Bullock Mann, F., & Velez, Dunlop, E. (2016). The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 11, 2016 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
- Latham, G. (1993). Do educators use the literature of the profession? National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 77, 63–67.Google Scholar
- Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education, 37, 1–26.Google Scholar
- Neal, Z. P., Neal, J. W., Mills, K. J., & Lawlor, J. A. (in press). Making or buying evidence: Using transaction cost economics to understand decision making in public schools. Evidence & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14778277473701.
- No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § p. 6301 et seq. (West 2003).Google Scholar
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ringeisen, H., Henderson, K., & Hoagwood, K. (2003). Context matters: Schools and the “research to practice gap” in children’s mental health. School Psychology Review, 32, 153–168.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th edn.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Tseng, V. (2012). The use of research in policy and practice. Society for Research on Child Development Social Policy Report, 26, 1–23.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2014). 2010–2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov.
- U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. (2016). Annual Estimates of the Resident Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov.
- U.S. Department of Education, Safe and Drug-free Schools Program. (1998) Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Federal Register, 63, 29902–29906.Google Scholar
- Walker, H. M. (2004). Commentary: Use of evidence-based interventions in schools: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. School Psychology Review, 33, 298–407.Google Scholar
- Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss, C. H., & Bucavalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014). Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41, 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar