Advertisement

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 343–350 | Cite as

Self-Regulated Force and Neuromuscular Responses During Fatiguing Isometric Leg Extensions Anchored to a Rating of Perceived Exertion

  • Joshua L. KellerEmail author
  • Terry J. Housh
  • Ethan C. Hill
  • Cory M. Smith
  • Richard J. Schmidt
  • Glen O. Johnson
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the fatigue-related patterns of responses for electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography (MMG), and force during a sustained isometric muscle action anchored to RPE = 5. Ten men (22.9 ± 2.0 year) performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) prior to and following an isometric leg extension muscle action, which was sustained for a maximal time-limit of 5 min or until it could not be maintained at RPE = 5 (actual time-limit). EMG amplitude (AMP), EMG mean power–frequency (MPF), MMG AMP, MMG MPF, and force values were determined every 5% of the actual time-limit. Regression analyses were used to examine the neuromuscular parameters and force responses, and a t test was used to examine MVIC. The pretest MVIC (62.4 ± 14.3 kg) was significantly (p < 0.001; d = 1.07) greater than posttest (47.9 ± 12.8 kg). The percent decline in force during the sustained isometric muscle action was 47.5 ± 19.6%, and there was a significant, negative force versus time relationship (p < 0.001; R = − 0.980). There was a significant, negative EMG AMP versus time relationship (p < 0.001; R = -0.789), but no significant (p > 0.05) relationships for EMG MPF, MMG AMP, or MMG MPF versus time. The findings indicated that it was necessary to reduce force and EMG AMP to maintain RPE = 5. We hypothesize that the maintenance of RPE = 5 was initially accomplished by an anticipatory feedforward mechanism and then continuous integrations of afferent feedback, which resulted in reductions of EMG AMP and force, due to reductions in neural drive, to attenuate the impact of metabolic byproducts.

Keywords

RPE clamp Self-regulated Afferent feedback Anticipatory feedforward 

Notes

References

  1. Basmajian, J., & De Luca, C. (1985). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography (5th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, T. W., Housh, T. J., Johnson, G. O., Weir, J. P., Cramer, J. T., Coburn, J. W., et al. (2004). Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology,14(5), 555–564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigland-Ritchie, B., & Woods, J. J. (1984). Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue. Muscle and Nerve,7(9), 691–699.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880070902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Billaut, F., Kerris, J. P., Rodriguez, R. F., Martin, D. T., Gore, C. J., & Bishop, D. J. (2013). Interaction of central and peripheral factors during repeated sprints at different levels of arterial O2 saturation. PLoS ONE,8(10), e77297.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blangsted, A. K., Vedsted, P., Sjøgaard, G., & Søgaard, K. (2005). Intramuscular pressure and tissue oxygenation during low-force static contraction do not underlie muscle fatigue. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica,183(4), 379–388.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01411.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg, G. (1990). Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health,16(Suppl 1), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broxterman, R. M., Hureau, T. J., Layec, G., Morgan, D. E., Bledsoe, A. D., Jessop, J. E., et al. (2018). Influence of group III/IV muscle afferents on small muscle mass exercise performance: A bioenergetics perspective. The Journal of Physiology,596(12), 2301–2314.  https://doi.org/10.1113/JP275817.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane, K., Housh, T., Bergstrom, H., Jenkins, N., Johnson, G., Schmidt, R., et al. (2015). Physiological responses during cycle ergometry at a constant perception of effort. International Journal of Sports Medicine,36(06), 466–473.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochrane-Snyman, K. C., Housh, T. J., Smith, C. M., Hill, E. C., Jenkins, N. D. M., Schmidt, R. J., et al. (2016). Inter-individual variability in the patterns of responses for electromyography and mechanomyography during cycle ergometry using an RPE-clamp model. European Journal of Applied Physiology,116(9), 1639–1649.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3394-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Smirmaul, B. P. C. (2012). Sense of effort and other unpleasant sensations during exercise: Clarifying concepts and mechanisms. British Journal of Sports Medicine,46(5), 308–311.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.071407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dideriksen, J. L., Enoka, R. M., & Farina, D. (2011). Neuromuscular adjustments that constrain submaximal EMG amplitude at task failure of sustained isometric contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985),111(2), 485–494.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00186.2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebenbichler, G., Kollmitzer, J., Quittan, M., Uhl, F., Kirtley, C., & Fialka, V. (1998). EMG fatigue patterns accompanying isometric fatiguing knee-extensions are different in mono- and bi-articular muscles. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control,109(3), 256–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-980x(98)00015-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Enoka, R. M., & Duchateau, J. (2016). Translating fatigue to human performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,48(11), 2228–2238.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000929.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Farina, D., & Merletti, R. (2000). Comparison of algorithms for estimation of EMG variables during voluntary isometric contractions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology,10(5), 337–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00025-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M. (2014). The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: An update. Journal of Applied Physiology,117(11), 1215–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00162.2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Flood, T. R., Waldron, M., & Jeffries, O. (2017). Oral menthol reduces thermal sensation, increases work-rate and extends time to exhaustion, in the heat at a fixed rating of perceived exertion. European Journal of Applied Physiology,117(7), 1501–1512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3645-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, A. S. C., Swart, J., & Tucker, R. (2018). The interaction of psychological and physiological homeostatic drives and role of general control principles in the regulation of physiological systems, exercise and the fatigue process—The Integrative Governor theory. European Journal of Sport Science,18(1), 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1321688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillies, M. J., Huang, Y., Hyam, J. A., Aziz, T. Z., & Green, A. L. (2019). Direct neurophysiological evidence for a role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in central command. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical,216, 51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2018.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Girard, O., Billaut, F., Christian, R. J., Bradley, P. S., & Bishop, D. J. (2017). Exercise-related sensations contribute to decrease power during repeated cycle sprints with limited influence on neural drive. European Journal of Applied Physiology,117(11), 2171–2179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3705-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Häkkinen, K. (1993). Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in male and female athletes during heavy resistance exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine,14(2), 53–59.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harbo, T., Brincks, J., & Andersen, H. (2012). Maximal isokinetic and isometric muscle strength of major muscle groups related to age, body mass, height, and sex in 178 healthy subjects. European Journal of Applied Physiology,112(1), 267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1975-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hicks, A. L., Kent-Braun, J., & Ditor, D. S. (2001). Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews,29(3), 109–112.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200107000-00004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, A. V. (1948). The pressure developed in muscle during contraction. The Journal of Physiology,107(4), 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, Sandra K. (2016). The relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,48(11), 2247–2256.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunter, S. K., & Enoka, R. M. (2001). Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology,91(6), 2686–2694.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller, J. L., Housh, T. J., Hill, E. C., Smith, C. M., Schmidt, R. J., & Johnson, G. O. (2018a). Neuromuscular responses of recreationally active women during a sustained, submaximal isometric leg extension muscle action at a constant perception of effort. European Journal of Applied Physiology,118(12), 2499–2508.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3976-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller, J. L., Housh, T. J., Smith, C. M., Hill, E. C., Schmidt, R. J., & Johnson, G. O. (2018b). Sex-related differences in the accuracy of estimating target force using percentages of maximal voluntary isometric contractions vs. ratings of perceived exertion during isometric muscle actions. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,32(11), 3294–3300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindstrom, L. (1970). Muscular fatigue and action potential conduction velocity changes studied with frequency analysis of EMG signals. Electromyography,10(4), 341–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcora, S. (2009). Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. Journal of Applied Physiology,106(6), 2060–2062.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, P. G., Weerakkody, N., Gandevia, S. C., & Taylor, J. L. (2008). Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans. The Journal of Physiology,586(Pt 5), 1277–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez-Valdes, E., Negro, F., Falla, D., De Nunzio, A. M., & Farina, D. (2018). Surface electromyographic amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles. Journal of Applied Physiology,124(4), 1071–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maughan, R. J., Harmon, M., Leiper, J. B., Sale, D., & Delman, A. (1986). Endurance capacity of untrained males and females in isometric and dynamic muscular contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology,55(4), 395–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422739.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McMorris, T., Barwood, M., & Corbett, J. (2018). Central fatigue theory and endurance exercise: Toward an interoceptive model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,93, 93–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrin, N. M., Stone, M. R., Swaine, I. L., & Henderson, K. J. (2018). The use of the CR-10 scale to allow self-regulation of isometric exercise intensity in pre-hypertensive and hypertensive participants. European Journal of Applied Physiology,118(2), 339–347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3774-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Noble, B., & Robertson, R. (1996). The Borg scale: Development, administration, and experimental use. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  36. Ormsbee, M. J., Carzoli, J. P., Klemp, A., Allman, B. R., Zourdos, M. C., Kim, J.-S., et al. (2019). Efficacy of the repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion for the bench press in experienced and novice benchers. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,33(2), 337.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robertson, R. J. (2004). Perceived exertion for practitioners: Rating effort with the OMNI picture system. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  38. Russ, D. W., & Kent-Braun, J. A. (2003). Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue are eliminated under ischemic conditions. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985),94(6), 2414–2422.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01145.2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tucker, R. (2009). The anticipatory regulation of performance: The physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine,43, 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker, R., Marle, T., Lambert, E. V., & Noakes, T. D. (2006). The rate of heat storage mediates an anticipatory reduction in exercise intensity during cycling at a fixed rating of perceived exertion. The Journal of Physiology,574(Pt 3), 905–915.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101733.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Zourdos, M. C., Klemp, A., Dolan, C., Quiles, J. M., Schau, K. A., Jo, E., et al. (2016). Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,30(1), 267.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Education and Human SciencesUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Division of Kinesiology, School of Kinesiology and Physical TherapyUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Kinesiology, College of Health SciencesUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations