Advertisement

Give Me Five? Examining the Psychophysiological Effects of High-Fives in Athletes

  • Franziska LautenbachEmail author
  • Damian Jeraj
  • Jonna Loeffler
  • Lisa Musculus
Article

Abstract

High-fives are a phenomenon that is frequently observed in sports. However, investigations on effects of high-fives are missing. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine psychophysiological effects of high-fives. From an embodied cognition perspective, dynamic, upward movements compared to downward movements should activate positive concepts that are represented by psychological as well as physiological states. Thirty-four athletes performed high- and low-fives (dynamic movements) as opposed to high and low static postures (control conditions) in a double-blind, within-subject design. Psychological states (i.e., feeling motivated, feeling strong) and physiological changes (i.e., cortisol, testosterone) due to the manipulation were measured. Results showed the predicted significant interaction effect for cortisol changes, but not for the other psychological (i.e., feeling motivated, feeling strong) and physiological (testosterone) state measures. In detail, a decrease in cortisol was found after athletes performed high-fives compared to low-fives. The observed effect on cortisol should be considered with caution and needs to be replicated, however, might add information to the current discussion about the crucial relevance of movement for embodied cognition effects. Future research could investigate the effects of high-fives with a partner and add performance parameters to provide more information on the effects of high-fives on performance in sport.

Keywords

Embodied cognition Movements Body memory Cortisol Testosterone Motivation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Nora Winkelmann, Justin Klanderman, Lisa Dammeier, and Robert Gundermann for their critical feedback or help in data collection. Also, we would like to thank all our participants.

Authors Contribution

All authors contributed to the study design equally. Data collection was performed by NW, JK, LD. All authors contributed to data analysis and interpretation as well as writing and approving the manuscript for submission equally. Thus, every author contributed equally to this work and should be considered joint first authors. The current order of authors is randomized.

Funding

This research project is funded by the German Sport University Cologne (Grant Number 920144. The funding sources are neither involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the data, the writing, or in the decision to submit for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 29685 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MOV 28495 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MOV 30055 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MOV 27848 kb)

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Wideman, L. (2017). Exercise and the cortisol awakening response: A systematic review. Sports Medicine-Open, 3(1), 37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0102-3.Google Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.Google Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, I. T., Walker, R. F., Riad-Fahmy, D., Wilson, D. W., & Griffiths, K. (1982). Circadian rhythms of testosterone and cortisol in saliva: Effects of activity-phase shifts and continuous daylight. Chronobiologia, 9(4), 389–396.Google Scholar
  5. Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437.Google Scholar
  6. Casasanto, D., & Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115(1), 179–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002.Google Scholar
  7. Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Carney, D. R. (2017). CRSP special issue on power poses: What was the point and what did we learn? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1309876.Google Scholar
  8. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Google Scholar
  9. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandino, L., Humphries, C. J., Seidenberg, M. S., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Binder, J. R. (2015). Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes. Neuropsychologia, 76, 17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.009.Google Scholar
  11. Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below “theory of mind”: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 362(1480), 659–669.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2002.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, W. K., Janson, J., & Wolf, J. M. (2017). Meta-analytical assessment of the effects of protocol variations on cortisol responses to the trier social stress test. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 80, 26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.030.Google Scholar
  13. Gronau, Q. F., Erp, S. V., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123–138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, M. H. S., & Paterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98–99.Google Scholar
  15. Kasper, D., & Koch, S. (2010). Body memory: A phenomenologic-psychological investigation. Presented at the International Small Group Meeting on Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  16. Knight, E. L., & Mehta, P. H. (2014). Hormones and hierarchies. In The psychology of social status (pp. 269–301). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_13.
  17. Koch, S. C. (2014). Rhythm is it: Effects of dynamic body feedback on affect and attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00537.Google Scholar
  18. Koch, S. C., Fuchs, T., & Summa, M. (2012). Body memory, metaphor and movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Kudielka, B. M., Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004). Acute HPA axis responses, heart rate, and mood changes to psychosocial stress (TSST) in humans at different times of day. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(8), 983–992.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.08.009.Google Scholar
  20. Lautenbach, F., Laborde, S., Achtzehn, S., & Raab, M. (2014). Preliminary evidence of salivary cortisol predicting performance in a controlled setting. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 42, 218–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.01.011.Google Scholar
  21. Lautenbach, F., Laborde, S., Mesagno, C., Lobinger, B. H., Achtzehn, S., & Arimond, F. (2015). Nonautomated pre-performance routine in tennis: An intervention study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27(2), 123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2014.957364.Google Scholar
  22. Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64(2), 377–402.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/64.2.377.Google Scholar
  23. Mooallem, J. (2013). The history and mystery of the high five. ESPN The Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/page/Mag15historyofthehighfive/who-invented-high-five.
  24. Morris, B. J., & Zentall, S. R. (2014). High fives motivate: The effects of gestural and ambiguous verbal praise on motivation. Developmental Psychology, 5, 928.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00928.Google Scholar
  25. Nair, S., Sagar, M., Sollers, J., Consedine, N., & Broadbent, E. (2015). Do slumped and upright postures affect stress responses? A randomized trial. Health Psychology, 34(6), 632–641.  https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000146.Google Scholar
  26. Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930.Google Scholar
  27. Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26(5), 653–656.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553946.Google Scholar
  28. Rimmele, U., Zellweger, B. C., Marti, B., Seiler, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Ehlert, U., et al. (2007). Trained men show lower cortisol, heart rate and psychological responses to psychosocial stress compared with untrained men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(6), 627–635.Google Scholar
  29. Riskind, J. H., & Gotay, C. C. (1982). Physical posture: Could it have regulatory or feedback effects on motivation and emotion? Motivation and Emotion, 6(3), 273–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992249.Google Scholar
  30. Ronay, R., Tybur, J. M., van Huijstee, D., & Morssinkhof, M. (2017). Embodied power, testosterone, and overconfidence as a causal pathway to risk-taking. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 28–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2016.1248081.Google Scholar
  31. Salvador, A., & Costa, R. (2009). Coping with competition: Neuroendocrine responses and cognitive variables. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 160–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.005.Google Scholar
  32. Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000). How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21(1), 55–89.Google Scholar
  33. Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216.Google Scholar
  34. Skoluda, N., La Marca, R., Gollwitzer, M., Müller, A., Limm, H., Marten-Mittag, B., et al. (2017). Long-term stability of diurnal salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase secretion patterns. Physiology & Behavior, 175, 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  36. Toone, R. J., Peacock, O. J., Smith, A. A., Thompson, D., Drawer, S., Cook, C., et al. (2013). Measurement of steroid hormones in saliva: Effects of sample storage condition. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 73(8), 615–621.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2013.835862.Google Scholar
  37. Zilioli, S., & Watson, N. V. (2012). The hidden dimensions of the competition effect: Basal cortisol and basal testosterone jointly predict changes in salivary testosterone after social victory in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 1855–1865.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.022.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Sport Psychology and Sport PedagogyLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Sports ScienceFriedrich-Schiller-University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations