Advertisement

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

19th International Meeting on Frankia and Actinorhizal Plants

  • Maher GtariEmail author
  • David R. Benson
  • Imen Nouioui
  • Jeffery O. Dawson
  • Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari
Editorial
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

It has been 40 years since the first meeting dedicated to Frankia and actinorhizal plants, which was held at Petersham, Massachusetts (reported in Torrey and Tjepkema, 1979). Since then biennial meetings have been organised and held in different venues around the globe (Table 1). The most recent meeting, the “19th International Meeting on Frankia and Actinorhizal Plants”, organised in Hammamet, Tunisia from 17th to 19th of March, 2018, gathered scientists from Algeria, Argentina, Belgium, China, Egypt, France, India, Portugal, Senegal, Sweden, UK, USA and Tunisia. The event was a stimulating opportunity for active researchers to share many advances since the previous meeting held in Montpellier, France (Franche et al. 2016) and to discuss new perspectives in this research field.

Keywords

Frankia Actinorhizal plants Plant-Microbe interactions 
Since 2016, the availability of many Frankia genomes (Tisa et al. 2016) covering the major Frankia clades (Gtari et al. 2013), and the incorporation of comparative genome data, omniLog phenoarrays, morphology, chemotaxonomy and host plant range knowledge have enabled species definitions according to conventional nomenclature. Gtari et al. (2019) summarise current Frankia taxonomy and provide keys features of the 11 species with validly published names that have been proposed within the genus Frankia. In this regard Nouioui et al. (2019) described a new species Frankia torreyi with CpI1T, the first member of the genus Frankia isolated in axenic condition (Callaham et al. 1978), as type strain.
Table 1

International meetings on Frankia and actinorhizal plants

Edition

Year

Place

Proceedings

Special issue

1

1978

Petersham, Massachusetts, USA

Torrey and Tjepkema (1979)

Botanical Gazette

2

1979

Corvalis, Oregon, USA

Gordon et al. (1979)

Oregon State University Press

3

1982

Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Torrey and Tjepkema (1983)

Canadian Journal of Botany

4

1983

Wageningen, The Netherlands

Akkermans et al. (1984)

Plant and Soil

5

1984

Québec, Canada

Lalonde et al. (1985)

Plant and Soil

6

1986

Umeâ, Sweden

Huss-Danell and Wheeler (1987)

Physiologia Plantarum

7

1989

Storrs, Connecticut, USA

Winship and Benson (1989)

Plant and Soil

8

1991

Lyon, France

Normand et al. (1992)

Acta Oecologica

9

1993

Okahune, New Zealand

Harris and Silvester (1994)

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

10

1995

Davis, California, USA

Berry and Myrold (1997)

Physiologia Plantarum

11

1998

Champaign; Illinois, USA

Dawson et al. (1999)

Canadian Journal of Botany

12

2001

Carry-le-Rouet, France

Normand et al. (2003)

Plant and Soil

13

2005

Durham, New Hampshire, USA

Tisa (2005)

Symbiosis

14

2006

Umeâ, Sweden

Sellstedt et al. (2007)

Physiologia Plantarum

15

2008

Bariloche, Argentina

Wall et al. (2010)

Symbiosis

16

2010

Porto, Portugal

Santos and Tavares (2012),

Archives of Microbiology;

   

Ribeiro et al. (2011)

Functional Plant Biology

17

2013

Shillong, India

Misra (2013)

Journal of Biosciences

18

2015

Montpellier, France

Franche et al. (2016)

Symbiosis

Establishing a Frankia actinorhizal symbiosis requires mutual recognition and specific molecular communication between the two partners. While most of symbiotic signaling pathways known for legume and mycorrhizal symbioses have counterparts in the actinorhizal symbiosis (Hocher et al. 2006, 2011; Demina et al. 2013; Griesmann et al. 2018), Frankia nodulating factor is different from known rhizobial and mycorrhizal chitin derivative factors (Cérémonie et al. 1998, 1999; Ghelue et al. 1997; Svistoonoff et al. 2010; Chabaud et al. 2016; Cissoko et al. 2018) and remains uncharacterised due to the continuing inablility to genetically manipulate Frankia. In this regard, Pesce et al. (2019) developed a colony PCR technique that provides a routine procedure for rapidly identifying Frankia strains that may expedite the process of identifying Frankia strains or potential transformants. In addition, Hocher et al. (2019) reported recent technical achievements for several actinorhizal species and major discoveries in Frankia-actinorhizal signaling pathways.

While the overall clustering of the four Frankia lineages remains conserved between each locus analysed with different levels of resolution (Gtari et al. 2013), the precise evolutionary history of the four clusters remains unclear and inconsistent. This topology is has been explored using a variety of approaches. In this context Sarkar et al. (2019) and Sen et al. (2019) used unusual phylogenetic approaches. Sarkar et al. (2019) selected 100 actinobacteria, including Frankia, and built a phylogenetic tree based on the presence and absence of protein domains. The resulting phylogeny clustered the actinobacteria mainly according to their niche rather than their taxonomic classification. Sen et al. (2019) reported a phylogenetic analysis based on putative carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) that are capable of breaking complex polysaccharides into simpler forms. Phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses showed that, in symbiotic Frankia strains, CAZymes are evolving slower than the other potentially highly expressed genes, whereas similar genes from asymbiotic Frankia strains showed little variation in their evolutionary constraints compared to other potentially highly expressed genes.

Isolation of several new strains was a fascinating feature of the meeting. A contributed paper by Gueddou et al. (2019) reports a second Cluster-2 isolate, designated BMG5.30, which is able to reinfect its host plant. Its genome sequence shows that it is more closely related to that Frankia coriariae BMG5.1 than the two other Frankia genomes from Datisca. Based on comparative genomics, Frankia sp. strain BMG5.30 is a new member of the species F. coriariae. Ghodhbane-Gtari et al. (2019) reported the isolation of two non-Frankia actinobacteria from root nodules of Casuarina glauca growing in Tunisia that have been assigned to the genus Nocardia with one strain that is the type strain representing a new species designated Nocardia casuarinae (Ghodhbane-Gtari et al. 2014). The two strains have several important traits that benefit actinorhizal plants. Their ability to produce auxins, cause root hair deformation, and induce nodule-like structures with beneficial growth promoting effects on the development of the C. glauca plants supports this idea. Coinfection studies also showed that BMG51109 caused an earlier onset of nodulation.

A number of contributions dealt with the environmental biology of Frankia. Kucho et al. (2019) studied Frankia communities in disturbed land on Mt. Ontake following the 1984 earthquake that caused a devastating landslide using nifH amplicon sequences. The authors demonstrated that a diverse Frankia community was detected in the most advanced revegetation area, suggesting that revegetation positively affects Frankia diversity. Rehan et al. (2018) reported the mechanism of detoxification and reduction of selenite to elemental red selenium by Frankia inefficax strain EuI1c. The involvement of a periplasmic-binding protein homolog, putative sulfate ABC transporter and extracellular ligand-binding receptor was demonstrated.

Within the current and predicted scenarios of climate changes and human population growth, and their concomitant impact on the availability of arable land, actinorhizal plants should be seen as strong candidates to mitigate some of the negative impacts thanks to their mutualistic symbiosis. Ribeiro-Barros et al. (2019) reviewed the distribution, conservation and uses of actinorhizal species native to or introduced in Africa and their relevance for the developing economies of many African countries, which are highly sensitive to climate and anthropogenic disturbances.

Zhong et al. (2019) reviewed Chinese inoculation expertise aimed at improving Casuarina spp. survival and productivity, mainly in the “Great Green Wall” that represents vast plantations of Casuarina along 3000 km long and 0.5–5 km width on the coast fronting the South China Sea.

Finally we are thankful to all attendees to Hammamet for the friendly atmosphere and productive meeting, to the authors that contributed to this special issue and to the Frankiologists who acted as anonymous reviewers. A special thank is expressed to Editor-in-Chief Professor Iain Sutcliffe and the Editorial office of Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

On to Japan-2020 for the next Frankia-actinorhizal plants meeting!

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akkermans ADL, Baker DD, Huss-Danell K, Tjepkema JD (1984) Preface. Plant Soil 78:ix–xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry AM, Myrold DD (eds) (1997) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Physiol Plant, vol 99, pp 564–731Google Scholar
  3. Callaham C, Deltredici P, Torrey JG (1978) Isolation and cultivation in vitro of the actinomycete causing root nodulation in comptonia. Science 199:899–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cérémonie H, Cournoyer B, Maillet F et al (1998) Genetic complementation of rhizobial nod mutants with Frankia DNA: Artifact or reality? Mol Gen Genet 260:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cérémonie H, Debellé F, Fernandez MP (1999) Structural and functional comparison of Frankia root hair deforming factor and rhizobia Nod factor. Can J Bot 77:1293–1301Google Scholar
  6. Chabaud M, Gherbi H, Pirolles E et al (2016) Chitinase-resistant hydrophilic symbiotic factors secreted by Frankia activate both Ca2+ spiking and NIN gene expression in the actinorhizal plant Casuarina glauca. New Phytol 209:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cissoko M et al (2018) Actinorhizal signaling molecules: Frankia root hair deforming factor shares properties with NIN inducing factor. Front Plant Sci 9:1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson JO, Berg RH, Paschke MW, Wheeler CT (1999) The 11thinternational conference on Frankia and actinorhizal plants at Champaign. CanJ Bot 77:1203–1400Google Scholar
  9. Demina IV, Persson T, Santos P et al (2013) Comparison of the nodule vs. root transcriptome of the actinorhizal plant Datiscaglomerata: actinorhizal nodules contain a specific class of defensins. PLoS ONE 8:e72442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franche C, Normand P, Pawlowski K, Tisa LS, Bogusz D (2016) An update on research on Frankia and actinorhizal plants on the occasion of the 18th meeting of the Frankia-actinorhizal plants symbiosis. Symbiosis 70(1–3):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghelue MV, Løvaas E, Ringø E, Solheim B (1997) Early interactions between Alnusglutinosa and Frankia strain ArI3. Production and specificity of root hair deformation factor (s). Physiol Planta 99:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghodhbane-Gtari F et al (2014) Nocardiacasuarinae sp. nov., an actinobacterial endophyte isolated from root nodules of Casuarina glauca. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105(6):1099–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghodhbane-Gtari F et al (2019) The plant-growth-promoting actinobacteria of the genus Nocardia induces root nodule formation in Casuarina glauca. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1147-0 Google Scholar
  14. Gordon JC, Wheeler CT and Perry DA (1979) Introduction. In: Gordon JC, Wheeler CT, Perry DA, Corvallis OR (eds) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the management of temperate forests. Oregon State University: Forest Research Laboratory, p 1Google Scholar
  15. Griesmann M, Chang Y, Liu X et al (2018) Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis. Science 361:eaat1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gtari M, Tisa LS, Normand P (2013) Diversity of Frankia strains, actinobacterial symbionts of actinorhizal plants. In: Symbiotic endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–148Google Scholar
  17. Gtari M, Nouioui I, Sarkar I, Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Tisa LS, Sen A, Klenk H-P (2019) An update on the taxonomy of the genus Frankia Brunchorst, 1886, 174 AL. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1165-y Google Scholar
  18. Gueddou A et al (2019) Draft genome sequence of the symbiotic Frankia sp. strain BMG5. 30 isolated from root nodules of Coriariamyrtifolia in Tunisia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1138-1 Google Scholar
  19. Harris SL, Silvester WB (eds) (1994) Frankia and actinorhizal plants: 9th international conference. Soil Biol Biochem vol 26, pp 525–661Google Scholar
  20. Hocher V, Auguy F, Argout X et al (2006) Expressed sequence-tag analysis in Casuarina glaucaactinorhizal nodule and root. New Phytol 169:681–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hocher V, Alloisio N, Auguy F et al (2011) Transcriptomics of actinorhizal symbioses reveals homologs of the whole common symbiotic signaling cascade. Plant Physiol 156:700–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hocher V, Ngom M, Carré-Mlouka A, Tisseyre P, Gherbi H, Svistoonoff S (2019) Signalling in actinorhizal root nodule symbioses. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1182-x Google Scholar
  23. Huss-Danell K, Wheeler CT (1987) Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Proceedings of the international meeting, Umeå, Sweden. Physiol Plant 70:235–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kucho KI, Tobita H, Ikebe M, Shibata M, Imaya A, Kabeya D, Morisada K (2019) Frankia communities at revegetating sites in Mt. Ontake, Japan. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1151-4 Google Scholar
  25. Lalonde M, Camiré C, Dawson JO (1985) Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Proceedings of the international meeting, Quebec, Canada. Plant Soil 87:1–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Misra AK (2013) Editorial. J Biosci 38:675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Normand P, Fernandez M, Simonet P, Domenach AM (1992) Frankiaandactinorhizal plants. Proceedings of the 8th international conference, Lyon, France. ActaOecol 13:1–516Google Scholar
  28. Normand P, Pawlowski K, Dawson JO (eds) (2003). Frankia symbiosis. Proceeding of the 12th meeting on Frankiaandactinorhizal plants, Carry-le-Rouet, France, June 2001. Plant Soil, vol 254, pp 1–244Google Scholar
  29. Nouioui I, Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Jando M, Tisa LS, Klenk H-P, Gtari M (2019) Frankia torreyi sp. nov., the first actinobacterium of the genus Frankia Brunchorst 1886, 174 AL isolated in axenic culture. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1131-8 Google Scholar
  30. Pesce C, Kleiner VA, Tisa LS (2019) Simple colony PCR procedure for the filamentous actinobacteria Frankia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1155-0 Google Scholar
  31. Rehan M, Alsohim AS, El-Fadly G, Tisa LS (2018) Detoxification and reduction of selenite to elemental red selenium by Frankia. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1196-4 Google Scholar
  32. Ribeiro A, Berry AM, Pawlowski K, Santos P (2011) Actinorhizal plants. Funct Plant Biol 38:v–viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ribeiro-Barros AI, Catarino S, Moura I, Ramalho JC, Romeiras MM, Ghodhbane-Gtari F (2019) Actinorhizal trees and shrubs from Africa: distribution, conservation and uses. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1174-x Google Scholar
  34. Santos CL, Tavares F (2012) A step further on Frankia biology. Arch Microbiol 194:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarkar I, Gtari M, Tisa LS, Sen A (2019) A novel phylogenetic tree based on the presence of protein domains in selected actinobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1154-1 Google Scholar
  36. Sellstedt A, Normand P, Dawson JO (2007) Frankia—the friendly bacteria—infecting actinorhizal plants. Physiol Planta 130:315–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sen A, Tisa LS, Gtari M, Sarkar I (2019) Contrasted evolutionary constraints on carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) in selected Frankia strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1173-y Google Scholar
  38. Svistoonoff S, Sy MO, Diagne N et al (2010) Infection-specific activation of the Medicagotruncatula Enod11 early nodulin gene promoter during actinorhizal root nodulation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:740–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tisa LS (2005) Preface. Symbiosis 39:59Google Scholar
  40. Tisa LS, Oshone R, Sarkar I, Ktari A, Sen A, Gtari M (2016) Genomic approaches toward understanding the actinorhizal symbiosis: an update on the status of the Frankia genomes. Symbiosis 70(1–3):5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torrey JG, Tjepkema JD (1979) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in actinomycete-nodulated plants. Preface. Bot Gaz 140:i–iiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Torrey JG, Tjepkema JD (1983) International conference on the biology of Frankia Introduction. Can J Bot 61:2765–2767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wall LG, Chaia E, Dawson JO (2010) Special volume devoted to the 15th International Frankia and actinorhizal plant meeting. Symbiosis 50:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winship LJ, Benson DR (1989) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Plant Soil 118:1–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhong C, Zhang Y, Wei Y, Meng J, Chen Y, Bogusz D, Franche C (2019) A role of Frankia inoculations in casuarina plantations in ChinaAntonie van Leeuwenhoek (under review)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University CarthageTunisTunisia
  2. 2.University ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  3. 3.University NewcastleNewcastle upon TyneUK
  4. 4.University IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  5. 5.University La ManoubaManoubaTunisia

Personalised recommendations