Advertisement

Designing an efficient blood supply chain network in crisis: neural learning, optimization and case study

  • Soheyl KhalilpourazariEmail author
  • Shima Soltanzadeh
  • Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber
  • Sankar Kumar Roy
S.I. : OR in Neuroscience II
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, attention to blood supply chain in disaster circumstances has significantly increased. Disasters, especially earthquakes, have adverse consequences such as destruction, loss of human lives, and undermining the effectiveness of health services. This research considers a six-echelon blood supply chain which consists of donors, blood collection centers (permanent and temporary), regional blood centers, local blood centers, regional hospitals, and local hospitals. For the first time, we considered that helicopters could carry blood from regional hospitals to local hospitals and return injured people that cannot be treated in local hospitals to regional hospitals due to the limited capacity. In addition to the above, different transportations with limited capacities regarded, where the optimal number of required transportations equipment determined after the solution process. This research aims to avoid the worst consequences of a disaster using a neural-learning process to gain from past experiences to meet new challenges. For this aim, this article considers three objective functions that are minimizing total transportation time and cost while minimizing unfulfilled demand. The model implemented based on a real-world case study from the most recent earthquake in the Iran–Iraq border which named the deadliest earthquake of 2017. Based on our results, we learned how to design an efficient blood supply chain that can fulfill hospitals blood demand quickly with the lowest cost using simulation and optimization processes. Moreover, we performed in-depth analyses and provided essential managerial insights at last.

Keywords

Blood supply chain Disaster management Humanitarian relief Lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff method Neural learning Operational research Multi-objective programming 

Notes

References

  1. Ahmadi, A., & Bazargan-Hejazi, S. (2018). 2017 Kermanshah earthquake; lessons learned. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 10(1), 1.Google Scholar
  2. Arvan, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Abdollahi, M. (2015). Designing a bi-objective and multi-product supply chain network for the supply of blood. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of Logistics, 11(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beliën, J., & Forcé, H. (2012). Supply chain management of blood products: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheraghi, S., & Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2017). Optimal blood transportation in disaster relief considering facility disruption and route reliability under uncertainty. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 4(3), 225–254.Google Scholar
  6. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Cozzolino, A. (2012). Humanitarian logistics and supply chain management. In Humanitarian logistics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
  8. Ebrahimi, M., & Rahmani, D. (2019). A five-dimensional approach to sustainability for prioritizing energy production systems using a revised GRA method: A case study. Renewable Energy, 135, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eskandari-Khanghahi, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Taleizadeh, A. A., & Amin, S. H. (2018). Designing and optimizing a sustainable supply chain network for a blood platelet bank under uncertainty. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 71, 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahimnia, B., Jabbarzadeh, A., Ghavamifar, A., & Bell, M. (2017). Supply chain design for efficient and effective blood supply in disasters. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fazli-Khalaf, M., Khalilpourazari, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Mixed robust possibilistic flexible chance constraint optimization model for emergency blood supply chain network design. Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2729-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. (2017). https://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/.
  13. Habibi-Kouchaksaraei, M., Paydar, M. M., & Asadi-Gangraj, E. (2018). Designing a bi-objective multi-echelon robust blood supply chain in a disaster. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 55, 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosseinifard, Z., & Abbasi, B. (2018). The inventory centralization impacts on sustainability of the blood supply chain. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M., Samani, M. R. G., & Cheraghi, S. (2019). Robust and stable flexible blood supply chain network design under motivational initiatives. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iranian seismological center. (2017). http://irsc.ut.ac.ir/.
  17. Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Seuring, S. (2014). Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: A robust model with real world application. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 70, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs, F. R., Chase, R. B., & Lummus, R. R. (2014). Operations and supply chain management (pp. 533–535). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Karasözen, B., Küçükseyhan, T., & Uzunca, M. (2017). Structure preserving integration and model order reduction of skew-gradient reaction–diffusion systems. Annals of Operations Research, 258(1), 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khalilpourazari, S., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2017). A lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff approach for multi-constrained multi-objective optimization of the surface grinding process. Engineering Optimization, 49(5), 878–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khalilpourazari, S., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2018a). Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 29, 1321–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khalilpourazari, S., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2018b). SCWOA: An efficient hybrid algorithm for parameter optimization of multi-pass milling process. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 35(3), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khalilpourazari, S., & Khamseh, A. A. (2017). Bi-objective emergency blood supply chain network design in earthquake considering earthquake magnitude: A comprehensive study with real world application. Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2588-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khalilpourazari, S., Mirzazadeh, A., Weber, G. W., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2019a). A robust fuzzy approach for constrained multi-product economic production quantity with imperfect items and rework process. Optimization.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2019.1630625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalilpourazari, S., Naderi, B., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2019b). Multi-objective stochastic fractal search: A powerful algorithm for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems. Soft Computing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04080-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khalilpourazari, S., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2018). Multi-objective optimization of multi-item EOQ model with partial backordering and defective batches and stochastic constraints using MOWCA and MOGWO. Operational Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0397-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khalilpourazari, S., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2019). Modeling and optimization of multi-item multi-constrained EOQ model for growing items. Knowledge-Based Systems, 164, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khalilpourazari, S., Pasandideh, S. H. R., & Ghodratnama, A. (2018). Robust possibilistic programming for multi-item EOQ model with defective supply batches: Whale Optimization and Water Cycle Algorithms. Neural Computing and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3492-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khalilpourazari, S., Pasandideh, S. H. R., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2019c). Optimizing a multi-item economic order quantity problem with imperfect items, inspection errors, and backorders. Soft Computing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03718-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohneh, J. N., Teymoury, E., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2016). Blood products supply chain design considering disaster circumstances (case study: Earthquake disaster in Tehran). Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9, 51–72.Google Scholar
  31. Mizutani, E., & Dreyfus, S. (2017). Totally model-free actor-critic recurrent neural-network reinforcement learning in non-Markovian domains. Annals of Operations Research, 258(1), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohammadi, M., & Khalilpourazari, S. (2017). Minimizing makespan in a single machine scheduling problem with deteriorating jobs and learning effects. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on software and computer applications, ACM, pp. 310–315.Google Scholar
  33. Mohammadian-Behbahani, Z., Jabbarzadeh, A., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2019). A robust optimisation model for sustainable blood supply chain network design under uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 31(4), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagurney, A., Masoumi, A. H., & Yu, M. (2012). Supply chain network operations management of a blood banking system with cost and risk minimization. Computational Management Science, 9(2), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Or, I., & Pierskalla, W. P. (1979). A transportation location-allocation model for regional blood banking. AIIE Transactions, 11(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pasandideh, S. H. R., & Khalilpourazari, S. (2018). Sine cosine crow search algorithm: a powerful hybrid meta heuristic for global optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08485.
  37. Pervin, M., Roy, S. K., & Weber, G. W. (2018). Analysis of inventory control model with shortage under time-dependent demand and time-varying holding cost including stochastic deterioration. Annals of Operations Research, 260(1–2), 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pierskalla, W. P. (2005). Supply chain management of blood banks. In Operations research and health care, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 103–145.Google Scholar
  39. Rahmani, D. (2018). Designing a robust and dynamic network for the emergency blood supply chain with the risk of disruptions. Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2960-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rahmani, D., Zandi, A., Behdad, S., & Entezaminia, A. (2019). A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines. Operational Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00451-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahmani, D., Zandi, A., Peyghaleh, E., & Siamakmanesh, N. (2018). A robust model for a humanitarian relief network with backup covering under disruptions: A real world application. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roy, S. K., Maity, G., Weber, G. W., & Alparslan Gök, S. Z. (2017). Conic scalarization approach to solve multi-choice multi-objective transportation problem with interval goal. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Şahin, G., Süral, H., & Meral, S. (2007). Locational analysis for regionalization of Turkish Red Crescent blood services. Computers & Operations Research, 34(3), 692–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Şahinyazan, F. G., Kara, B. Y., & Taner, M. R. (2015). Selective vehicle routing for a mobile blood donation system. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salehi, F., Mahootchi, M., & Husseini, S. M. M. (2017). Developing a robust stochastic model for designing a blood supply chain network in a crisis: A possible earthquake in Tehran. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2533-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Samani, M. R. G., & Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2018). An enhanced procedure for managing blood supply chain under disruptions and uncertainties. Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2873-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Samani, M. R. G., Torabi, S. A., & Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2018). Integrated blood supply chain planning for disaster relief. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 168–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Şaylı, M., & Yılmaz, E. (2017). Anti-periodic solutions for state-dependent impulsive recurrent neural networks with time-varying and continuously distributed delays. Annals of Operations Research, 258(1), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sha, Y., & Huang, J. (2012). The multi-period location-allocation problem of engineering emergency blood supply systems. Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization. In Theory, computation and applications, Willey, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Tabatabaie, M., Ardalan, A., Abolghasemi, H., Naieni, K. H., Pourmalek, F., Ahmadi, B., et al. (2010). Estimating blood transfusion requirements in preparation for a major earthquake: The Tehran, Iran study. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 25(3), 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valinejad, F., & Rahmani, D. (2018). Sustainability risk management in the supply chain of telecommunication companies: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yerlikaya-Özkurt, F., Askan, A., & Weber, G. W. (2014). An alternative approach to the ground motion prediction problem by a non-parametric adaptive regression method. Engineering Optimization, 46(12), 1651–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yerlikaya-Özkurt, F., Askan, A., & Weber, G. W. (2016). A hybrid computational method based on convex optimization for outlier problems: Application to earthquake ground motion prediction. Informatica, 27(4), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zahiri, B., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2017). Blood supply chain network design considering blood group compatibility under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 2013–2033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zahiri, B., Torabi, S. A., Mohammadi, M., & Aghabegloo, M. (2018). A multi-stage stochastic programming approach for blood supply chain planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheyl Khalilpourazari
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Shima Soltanzadeh
    • 2
  • Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber
    • 3
    • 6
  • Sankar Kumar Roy
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering (MIAE)Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland
  4. 4.Department of Applied Mathematics with Oceanology and Computer ProgrammingVidyasagar UniversityMidnaporeIndia
  5. 5.Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise NetworksLogistics and Transportation (CIRRELT)MontrealCanada
  6. 6.Institute of Applied MathematicsMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations