Advertisement

Does the Kuznets curve exist in Thailand? A two decades’ perspective (1993–2015)

  • Paravee Maneejuk
  • Woraphon YamakaEmail author
  • Songsak Sriboonchitta
S.I.: Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling & Decision Making 2018
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

To explore the relationship between income inequality and economic development, and particularly to prove the existence of the Kuznets curve in Thailand’s economy along these two decades, we propose the simultaneous smooth transition kink equations (SKE) model in which each regression parameter can be present in two different regimes, lower and upper. The regression coefficients split into two parts based on the unknown kink and smooth parameters in the logistic function. Thus, the model provides a flexible structure to capture and explain the relationship between income inequality and economic development following the inverted-U curve called the Kuznets curve. Also, we extend the analysis of the SKE model by modelling its nonlinear dependence structure through various Copula functions. Thus, the model becomes more flexible in coupling together the different marginal distributions. Before investigating the Kuznets curve, we conduct a simulation study to confirm the performance and accuracy of our proposed model. The satisfactory results are obtained from this simulation study as the estimated coefficient results are close to the true values under a wide array of simulated data models and distributions together with three smooth transition functions. Finally, according to the present empirical results, the Kuznets hypothesis does not hold at the country level, but it does for the North and Northeast regions. Also, our findings show alternative ways to reduce income inequality by increasing private sector contribution, GDP per capita, government expenditure and government subsidy. Additionally, this study applies the same method for investigating the Kuznets curve in the regions to answer the question ‘Are there regional Kuznets curves in Thailand?’ Our model shows some exciting results in income distribution in the different areas that may support the theory of Kuznets.

Keywords

Economic development and Gini Kuznets hypothesis Smooth kink Simultaneous equations Copulas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Laxmi Worachai for her helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. The authors are also grateful for the financial support offered by Center of Excellence in Econometrics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 385–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avdoulas, C., Bekiros, S., & Boubaker, S. (2018). Evolutionary-based return forecasting with nonlinear STAR models: Evidence from the Eurozone peripheral stock markets. Annals of Operations Research, 262(2), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonyamanond, S. (2007). Can equality and growth be simultaneously achieved? Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 19(2), 135–160.Google Scholar
  5. Bulir, M. A. (1998). Income inequality: Does inflation matter? International Monetary Fund, 148, 139–159.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, W. (2014). Understanding the Kuznets Process: An Empirical Investigation of Income Inequality in China 19782011 (No. 12-14). Monash University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Cherubini, U., Luciano, E., & Vecchiato, W. (2004). Copula methods in finance. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chow, G. C., & Lin, A. L. (1971). Best linear unbiased interpolation, distribution, and extrapolation of time series by related series. Review of Economics and Statistics, 4, 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabla-Norris, M. E., Kochhar, M. K., Suphaphiphat, M. N., Ricka, M. F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  10. Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterly, W. (1999). Life during growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(3), 239–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1991). Long-run economic relationships: Readings in cointegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frazer, G. (2006). Inequality and development across and within countries. World Development, 34(9), 1459–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallup, J. L. (2012). Is there a Kuznets curve. Portland State University, pp. 575–603 (working paper).Google Scholar
  16. Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2004). From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(4), 1001–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganaie, A. A., & Kamaiah, B. (2015). Kuznets inverted U hypothesis of income inequality: Looking inside the available economic literature. Available at SSRN 2591284.Google Scholar
  18. Ghazanchyan, M., Stotsky, J. G., & Zhang, Q. (2015). A new look at the determinants of growth in Asian Countries. IMF Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Granger, C. W. J. (1980). Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory, M. N., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustafson E. E., & Kessel W. C. (1978). Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control (pp 761–766).Google Scholar
  22. Gustafsson, B., & Johansson, M. (1999). In search of smoking guns: What makes income inequality vary over time in different countries? American Sociological Review, 64, 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsing, Y., & Smyth, D. J. (1994). Kuznets’s inverted-U hypothesis revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 1, 111–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ikemoto, Y., & Uehara, M. (2000). Income inequality and Kuznets’ hypothesis in Thailand. Asian Economic Journal, 14(4), 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irons, J., & Bivens, J. (2010). Government debt and growth: Overreaching claims of debt threshold suffer from theoretical and empirical flaws. Economic Policy Institute, EPI briefing paper (271).Google Scholar
  27. Kaasa, A. (2003).Factors influencing income inequality in transition economies. University of Tartu Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series, (18).Google Scholar
  28. Khalifa, S., & El Hag, S. (2010). Income disparities, economic growth, and development as a threshold. Journal of Economic Development, 35(2), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimura, T., Kobayashi, H., Muranaga, J., & Ugai, H. (2003). The effect of the increase in the monetary base on Japan’s economy at zero interest rates: an empirical analysis. In Monetary policy in a changing environment, bank for international settlements conference series (Vol. 19, pp. 276–312).Google Scholar
  30. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  31. Lazear, E., & Rosen, S. (1981). nRank order tournaments as optimal salary schemeso. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahfoud, M., & Michael, M. (2012). Bivariate Archimedean Copulas: An application to two stock market indices. BMI Paper.Google Scholar
  34. Maneejuk, P., Pastpipatkul, P., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2016). Economic growth and income inequality: Evidence from Thailand. In Integrated uncertainty in knowledge modelling and decision making: 5th international symposium, IUKM 2016, Da Nang, Vietnam, November 30-December 2, 2016, Proceedings 5 (pp. 649–663). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Mathur, V. K. (1999). Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (2012). Income inequality and growth: The role of taxes and transfers. In OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, No. 9. January 2012.Google Scholar
  37. Ogus Binatli, A. (2012). Growth and income inequality: A comparative analysis. Economics Research International.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/569890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pastpipatkul, P., Maneejuk, P., Wiboonpongse, A., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2016). Seemingly unrelated regression based copula: An application on thai rice market. In Causal inference in econometrics (pp. 437–450). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Preechametta, A. (2015). Dynamics of income inequality under social identity hypothesis. Applied Economics Journal, 22(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  40. Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Savvides, A., & Stengos, T. (2000). Income inequality and economic development: Evidence from the threshold regression model. Economics Letters, 69(2), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shahbaz, M., & Islam, F. (2011). Financial development and income inequality in Pakistan: An application of ARDL approach. Journal of Economic Development, 36(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sklar, A. (1973). Random variables, joint distribution functions, and Copulas. Kybernetika, 9(6), 449–460.Google Scholar
  44. Tran, H. D., Pham, U. H., Ly, S., & Vo-Duy, T. (2017). Extraction dependence structure of distorted Copulas via a measure of dependence. Annals of Operations Research, 256(2), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trivedi, P. K., & Zimmer, D. M. (2007). Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 1(1), 1–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wichitaksorn, N., Choy, S. T. B., & Gerlach, R. (2006). Estimation of bivariate Copula-based seemingly unrelated Tobit models. Discipline of Business Analytics, University of Sydney Business School. NSW. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Excellence in Econometrics, Faculty of EconomicsChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations