Advertisement

Evidence regarding external financing in manufacturing MSEs using partial least squares regression

  • Eduard Gabriel CeptureanuEmail author
  • Sebastian Ceptureanu
  • Claudiu Herteliu
S.I.: Recent Developments in Financial Modeling and Risk Management
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore and explain the relationship between networking, external financing by banks and equity investors, and export effort in medium sized enterprises. Our research model was empirically tested on a sample of 143 MSEs in the manufacturing sector and our PLS results do not confirm the existence of a direct association between networking and export effort by MSEs. They show, however, that networking indirectly enhances MSEs’ export effort through facilitating their access to equity financing and reducing managerial risks. Whilst networking are not found to be associated with a higher access to bank financing by MSEs, this type of external financing seems to have a greater impact on export effort than equity financing. This research it is one of the first studies to explore the role of networking with stakeholders in facilitating MSEs’ access to external financing and to international markets and to merge these variables in a single model which consider simultaneously the MSE access to bank financing and to equity financing.

Keywords

External financing Risk management Networking Stakeholders Equity financing 

Notes

References

  1. Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Ter Wal, A. L. (2012). Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Business Economics, 39, 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, E. I., Sabato, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). The value of non-financial information in small and medium-sized enterprise risk management. Journal of Credit Risk, 6, 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amal, M., Rocha, F., & Filho, A. (2010). Internationalization of small- and medium-sized enterprises: A multi-case study. European Business Review, 22, 608–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avkiran, N. K., & Alpert, K. (2015). The influence of co-authorship on article impact in OR/MS/OM and the exchange of knowledge with Finance in the twenty-first century. Annals of Operations Research, 235, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babakus, E., Yavas, U., & Haahti, A. (2006). Perceived uncertainty: Networking and export performance: A study of nordic SMEs. European Business Review, 18, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartoli, F., Ferri, G., & Murro, P. (2014). Bank support and export: Evidence from small Italian firms. Small Business Economics, 42, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2003). Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: A DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, A. N., & Frame, W. S. (2007). Small business credit scoring and credit availability. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehe, D. (2013). Collaborate at home to win abroad: How does access to local network resources influence export behavior? Journal of Small Business Management, 51, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandouy, O., Kerstens, K., & Van de Woestyne, I. (2015). Frontier-based vs. traditional mutual fund ratings: A first backtesting analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 242, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brouthers, L. E., & Nakos, G. (2005). The role of systematic international market selection on small firms’ export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brustbauer, J. (2014). Enterprise risk management in SMEs: Towards a structural model. International Small Business Journal, 34, 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgstaller, J., & Wagner, E. (2015). How do family ownership and founder management affect capital structure decisions and adjustment of SMEs? Evidence from a bank-based economy. The Journal of Risk Finance, 16, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camanho, A. S., Dyson, R. G., The, I., & Sim, T. (1999). Efficiency, size, benchmarks and targets for bank branches: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castellano, R., & Cerqueti, R. (2014). Mean-variance portfolio selection in presence of infrequently traded stocks. European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ceptureanu, E. G., Ceptureanu, S. I., & Popescu, D. I. (2017). Relationship between entropy, corporate entrepreneurship and organizational capabilities in romanian medium sized enterprises. Entropy, 19, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cerqueti, R., Falbo, P., Guastaroba, G., & Pelizzari, C. (2013). A tabu search heuristic procedure in Markov chain bootstrapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cerqueti, R., Rotundo, R., & Ausloos, M. (2018). Investigating the configurations in cross shareholding: A joint copula- entropy approach. Entropy, 20, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. De Maeseneire, W., & Claeys, T. (2012). SMEs, foreign direct investment and financial constraints: The case of Belgium. International Business Review, 21, 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delerue, H., & Perez, M. (2009). Unilateral commitment in alliances: An optional behavior. Journal of Management Development, 28, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fatoki, O., & Odeyemi, A. (2010). Which new small and medium enterprises in South Africa have access to bank credit. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fethi, M. D., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing bank performance with operational artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gao, G. Y., Murray, J., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2009). A ‘strategy tripod’ perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31, 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & O‘Donnell, A. (2004). Small business owner-managers and their attitude to risk. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haahti, A., Madupu, V., Yavas, U., & Babakus, E. (2005). Cooperative strategy, knowledge intensity and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 40, 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallerbach, W., Ning, H., Soppe, A., & Spronk, J. (2004). A framework for managing a portfolio of socially responsible investments. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 53, 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hollman, K. W., & Mohammad-Zadeh, S. (1984). Risk management in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 22, 7–55.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (1998). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Kaffash, S., & Marra, M. (2017). Data envelopment analysis in financial services: A citations network analysis of banks, insurance companies and money market funds. Annals of Operations Research, 253, 307–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2004). Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. The Journal of Finance, 59, 2177–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. L., & Morgan, A. N. (2000). Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kazem, A., & Van Der Heijden, B. (2006). Exporting firms’ strategic choices: The case of Egyptian SMEs in the food industry. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71, 21–33.Google Scholar
  38. Kim, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2014). Managing risk in the formative years: Evidence from young enterprises in Europe. Technovation, 34, 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le, N. T. B., & Nguyen, T. (2009). The impact of networking on bank financing: The case of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 867–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lockett, A., Wright, M., Burrows, A., Scholes, L., & Paton, D. (2008). The export intensity of venture capital backed companies. Small Business Economics, 31, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Echeverría Lazcano, A. M., & Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K., & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non- parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. (2011). ISIC Rev.3 technology intensity definition. Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/48350231.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2018.
  44. Ogryczak, W., & Ruszczynski, A. (1999). From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semi deviations as risk measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Okpara, J. O., & Koumbiadis, N. J. (2010). Strategic export orientation and internationalization barriers: Evidence from SMEs in a developing economy. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
  46. Pinho, J. C. (2007). The impact of ownership. International Marketing Review, 24, 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. EU recommendation 2003/361.Google Scholar
  48. Riding, A., Orser, B. J., Spence, M., & Bélanger, B. (2012). Financing new venture exporters. Small Business Economics, 38, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ringle, C., M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt, Germany: SmartPLS. Available at: http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed April 5, 2018.
  50. Rodriguez, A., & Nieto, M. J. (2010). The internationalization of knowledge-intensive business services: The effect of collaboration and the mediating role of innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 32, 1057–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soderqvist, A., & Chetty, S. K. (2013). Strength of ties involved in international new ventures. European Business Review, 25, 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sousa, C. M. P., Martinez-López, F. G., & Coelho, F. (2008). The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 343–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steuer, R. E., Qi, Y., & Hirschberger, M. (2007). Suitable-portfolio investors, non-dominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 152, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Utz, S., Wimmer, M., Hirschberger, M., & Steuer, R. (2013). Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vassiloglou, M., & Giokas, D. (1990). A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41, 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academia de Studii Economice din BucurestiBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations