Advertisement

On the economic growth and environmental trade-off: a multi-objective analysis

  • Simone MarsiglioEmail author
  • Fabio Privileggi
S.I.: MOPGP 2017
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

We develop a multicriteria approach, based on both scalarization and goal programming techniques, in order to analyze the trade off between economic growth and environmental outcomes in a framework in which the economy and environment relation is bidirectional. On the one hand, economic growth by stimulating production activities gives rise to emissions of pollutants which deteriorate the environment. On the other hand, the environment affects economic activities since pollution generates a production externality determining how much output the economy can produce and reducing welfare. In this setting we show that optimality dictates an initial overshooting followed by economic degrowth and rising pollution. This implies that independently of the relative importance of economic and environmental factors, it is paradoxically optimal for the economy to asymptotically reach the maximum pollution level that the environment is able to bear.

Keywords

Economic growth Pollution Multi-objective optimization 

JEL Classification

O40 O41 Q50 Q56 

Notes

References

  1. Ansuategi, A., & Marsiglio, S. (2017). Is environmental protection expenditure beneficial for the environment? Review of Development Economics, 21, 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansuategi, A., & Perrings, C. A. (2000). Transboundary externalities in the environmental transition hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17, 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athanassoglou, S., & Xepapadeas, A. (2012). Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63, 304–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1998). Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economic problems. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bethmann, D. (2007). A closed-form solution of the Uzawa–Lucas model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economics, 90(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethmann, D. (2013). Solving macroeconomic models with homogeneous technology and logarithmic preferences. Australian Economic Papers, 52(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Economic growth and the environment: A review of theory and empirics. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 1749–1821). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Chinchilnisky, G. (1997). What is sustainable development? Land Economics, 73, 476–491.Google Scholar
  10. Chinchilnisky, G., Heal, G., & Beltratti, A. (1995). The green golden rule. Economics Letters, 49, 174–179.Google Scholar
  11. Colapinto, C., Jayaraman, R., & Marsiglio, S. (2017b). Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences. Annals of Operations Research, 251, 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colapinto, C., Liuzzi, D., & Marsiglio, S. (2017a). Sustainability and intertemporal equity: A multicriteria approach. Annals of Operations Research, 251, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Frutos, J., & Martín-Herran, G. (2018). Spatial effects and strategic behavior in a multiregional transboundary pollution dynamic game. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  14. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977). The steady state and ecological salvation: A thermodynamic analysis. BioScience, 27, 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis—state of the art surveys. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. John, A., & Pecchenino, R. (1994). An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Economic Journal, 104, 1393–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Martinez-Alierc, J. (2012). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. La Torre, D., Liuzzi, D., & Marsiglio, S. (2015). Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over time. Mathematical Social Sciences, 78, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. La Torre, D., Liuzzi, D., & Marsiglio, S. (2017). Pollution control under uncertainty and sustainability concern. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67, 885–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latouche, S. (2009). Degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 519–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsiglio, S. (2017). A simple endogenous growth model with endogenous fertility and environmental concern. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 64, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsiglio, S., & La Torre, D. (2018). Economic growth and abatement activities in a stochastic environment: A multi-objective approach. Annals of Operations Research, 267, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsiglio, S., Ansuategi, A., & Gallastegui, M. C. (2016). The environmental Kuznets curve and the structural change hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 63, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramsey, F. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy, B., & Vincke, P. (1981). Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 8, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soretz, S. (2007). Efficient dynamic pollution taxation in an uncertain environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 36, 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stokey, N. L. (1998). Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review, 39, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. von Weizcker, C. C. (1967). Lemmas for a theory of approximately optimal growth. Review of Economic Studies, 34, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xepapadeas, A. (2005). Economic growth and the environment. In K.-G. Maler & J. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1219–1271). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Statistics “Cognetti de Martiis”University of TurinTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations