We consider how a marketer of a GM food product should price it in response to the requirement of GMO food label in the near future and its effect on consumers’ heterogenous attitude. We examine how the GM food pricing is affected by different consumer attitudes toward GM-food (Like, Uninformed, and Dislike), the GMO food labelling to be enforced, and price competition. On the one hand, the GM food seller should expect to raise price after the GMO food labelling to cover the additional cost incurred on labelling. On the other hand, the seller may need to reduce price after labelling as the Uninformed consumers’ attitude may change and become negative once the labelling is available. The tradeoff of these two effects yields interesting results. For example, we find that a monopolist GM food seller may choose to charge a high price, i.e., charge a premium for the GM-traits, and maintain at this price even after the labelling is enforced. Managerial implications and future research directions are discussed.
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, A., & Vitharana, P. (2009). Impact of customer knowledge heterogeneity on bundling strategy. Marketing Science, 28(4), 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccia, F. (2016). Consumer perception: An analysis on second generation genetically modified foods. Nutrition & Food Science, 46(5), 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchione, M., Feldman, C., & Wunderlich, S. (2015). Consume knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 66(3), 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar