Production and safety efficiency evaluation in Chinese coal mines: accident deaths as undesirable output

  • 226 Accesses

  • 1 Citations


Coal mining is one of the highest-risk industries in China. Accident deaths in coal mines attract intense concern every year. This is the first attempt to measure production efficiency of coal mines with consideration of accident deaths. A combined directional distance function and slacks-based model is proposed to assess production and safety efficiency across 18 coal-mining provinces in China. Results showed that the average total factor humanitarian-production efficiency is poor, with nearly half of production potential unexploited. Safety efficiency is also low, and half of the deaths would be avoided if all coal enterprises operated at fully efficient levels. The directional contribution analysis pointed out that southern provinces should pay more attention to accident deaths than northern ones, while the importance of reducing accident death in efficiency promotion declined for nearly all provinces, which creates a tradeoff between safety and efficiency for enterprises and regulators. The results of this study showed that the safety situation of coal mines is not as optimistic as the official data suggest. Effective prevention mechanisms are urgently needed to prevent disastrous accidents in coal mines in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5


  1. Arabi, B., Munisamy, S., & Emrouznejad, A. (2015). A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. Omega, 51, 29–37.

  2. Asmild, M., Kronborg, D., & Matthews, K. (2016). Introducing and modeling inefficiency contributions. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 725–730.

  3. Baek, C., & Lee, J.-D. (2009). The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the least-distance measure. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1), 265–275.

  4. Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Additional topics in DEA. In P. Bogetoft & L. Otto (Eds.), Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R (pp. 115–153). New York: Springer.

  5. Byrnes, P., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1984). Measuring productive efficiency: An application to Illinois strip mines. Management Science, 30(6), 671–681.

  6. Byrnes, P., Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1988). The effect of unions on productivity: U.S. surface mining of coal. Management Science, 34(9), 1037–1053.

  7. Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 407–419.

  8. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(1), 181–186.

  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto–Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91–107.

  10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. J. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

  11. Choi, T.-M. (2015). Sustainable management of mining operations with accidents: A mean–variance optimization model. Resources Policy, 46, 116–122.

  12. Choi, T.-M. (2016). Multi-period risk minimization purchasing models for fashion products with interest rate, budget, and profit target considerations. Annals of Operations Research, 237(1), 77–98.

  13. Choi, T.-M., Cheng, T. C. E., & Zhao, X. (2016). Multi-methodological research in operations management. Production and Operations Management, 25(3), 379–389.

  14. Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229–240.

  15. Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2016). Efficiency and benchmarking with directional distances: A data-driven approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(7), 928–944.

  16. Fang, H., Wu, J., & Zeng, C. (2009). Comparative study on efficiency performance of listed coal mining companies in China and the US. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5140–5148.

  17. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2006). New directions: Efficiency and Productivity. New York: Springer.

  18. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Margaritis, D. (2015). Distance functions in primal and dual spaces. In J. Zhu (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of models and methods (pp. 1–21). New York: Springer.

  19. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055–1066.

  20. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2013). Directional output distance functions: Endogenous directions based on exogenous normalization constraints. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 267–269.

  21. Farsi, M., Filippini, M., & Greene, W. (2005). Efficiency measurement in network industries: Application to the Swiss railway companies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 28(1), 69–90.

  22. Farsi, M., Filippini, M., & Greene, W. (2006). Application of panel data models in benchmarking analysis of the electricity distribution sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(3), 271–290.

  23. Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(4), 274–287.

  24. Geissler, B., Mew, M. C., Weber, O., & Steiner, G. (2015). Efficiency performance of the world’s leading corporations in phosphate rock mining. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105(Part B), 246–258.

  25. Homer, A. W. (2009). Coal mine safety regulation in China and the USA. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 39(3), 424–439.

  26. Kulshreshtha, M., & Parikh, J. K. (2002). Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in India: A DEA analysis. Energy Economics, 24(5), 439–453.

  27. Kumar, S., & Managi, S. (2010). Environment and productivities in developed and developing countries: The case of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(7), 1580–1592.

  28. Lee, C.-Y., & Johnson, A. L. (2015). Measuring efficiency in imperfectly competitive markets: An example of rational inefficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164(2), 702–722.

  29. Li, L.-B., & Hu, J.-L. (2012). Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 46, 216–224.

  30. Lozano, S., & Gutiérrez, E. (2008). Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 687–699.

  31. Luenberger, D. G. (1992). Benefit functions and duality. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(5), 461–481.

  32. Pal, D., & Mitra, S. K. (2016). An application of the directional distance function with the number of accidents as an undesirable output to measure the technical efficiency of state road transport in India. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 93, 1–12.

  33. Shen, Z., Boussemart, J.-P., & Leleu, H. (2017). Aggregate green productivity growth in OECD’s countries. International Journal of Production Economics, 189, 30–39.

  34. Sider, H. (1983). Safety and productivity in underground coal mining. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 225–233.

  35. Simar, L., & Vanhems, A. (2012). Probabilistic characterization of directional distances and their robust versions. Journal of Econometrics, 166(2), 342–354.

  36. Song, M., Fisher, R., Wang, J., & Cui, L. (2016). Environmental performance evaluation with big data: Theories and methods. Annals of Operations Research.

  37. Song, M., & Wang, J. (2016). Coal price fluctuations in China: Economic effects and policy implications. Journal of Renewable & Sustainable Energy, 8(6), 9011–9014.

  38. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

  39. Tsolas, I. E. (2011). Performance assessment of mining operations using nonparametric production analysis: A bootstrapping approach in DEA. Resources Policy, 36(2), 159–167.

  40. Tu, J. (2007). Safety challenges in China’s coal mining industry. China Brief, 7(1), 6–8.

  41. Wang, Q., Su, B., Zhou, P., & Chiu, C.-R. (2016). Measuring total-factor CO2 emission performance and technology gaps using a non-radial directional distance function: A modified approach. Energy Economics, 56, 475–482.

  42. Wang, L., Tran, T., & Nguyen, N. (2015). An empirical study of hybrid DEA and grey system theory on analyzing performance: A case from Indian mining industry. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2015, 1–15.

  43. Wang, K., Xian, Y., Lee, C.-Y., Wei, Y.-M., & Huang, Z. (2017). On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: A review. Annals of Operations Research.

  44. Weber, M. M., & Weber, W. L. (2004). Productivity and efficiency in the trucking industry: Accounting for traffic fatalities. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(1), 39–61.

  45. Wu, J., Xiong, B., An, Q., Sun, J., & Wu, H. (2017). Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1), 257–276.

  46. Yu, M.-M., & Fan, C.-K. (2006). Measuring the cost effectiveness of multimode bus transit in the presence of accident risks. Transportation Planning and Technology, 29(5), 383–407.

  47. Zhou, Y., Xing, X., Fang, K., Liang, D., & Xu, C. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of power industry in China based on an entropy SBM model. Energy Policy, 57, 68–75.

  48. Zofio, J. L., Pastor, J. T., & Aparicio, J. (2013). The directional profit efficiency measure: On why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 257–266.

Download references


We would like to show our appreciation for the support of the Humanities and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education Youth Project of China (No. 16YJCZH155), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-12-0595), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71171001), Key Foundation of Natural Science for Colleges and Universities in Anhui, China (No. KJ2011A001), Soft Science Foundation of Anhui, China (No. 12020503063), and Key Foundation of National Research in Statistics of China (No. 2011LZ023), Humanities and Social Science Research Project of Education Department in Liaoning, China (No. LN2017QN001).

Author information

Correspondence to Jianlin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, M., Wang, J., Zhao, J. et al. Production and safety efficiency evaluation in Chinese coal mines: accident deaths as undesirable output. Ann Oper Res (2018) doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2804-4

Download citation


  • Total factor humanitarian-production efficiency
  • Total factor safety efficiency
  • Directional distance function
  • Slacks-based measure
  • Accident deaths
  • Coal mining