Formulation and solution of a two-stage capacitated facility location problem with multilevel capacities
- 174 Downloads
In this paper, the multi-product facility location problem in a two-stage supply chain is investigated. In this problem, the locations of depots (distribution centres) need to be determined along with their corresponding capacities. Moreover, the product flows from the plants to depots and onto customers must also be optimised. Here, plants have a production limit whereas potential depots have several possible capacity levels to choose from, which are defined as multilevel capacities. Plants must serve customer demands via depots. Two integer linear programming (ILP) models are introduced to solve the problem in order to minimise the fixed costs of opening depots and transportation costs. In the first model, the depot capacity is based on the maximum number of each product that can be stored whereas in the second one, the capacity is determined by the size (volume) of the depot. For large problems, the models are very difficult to solve using an exact method. Therefore, a matheuristic approach based on an aggregation approach and an exact method (ILP) is proposed in order to solve such problems. The methods are assessed using randomly generated data sets and existing data sets taken from the literature. The solutions obtained from the computational study confirm the effectiveness of the proposed matheuristic approach which outperforms the exact method. In addition, a case study arising from the wind energy sector in the UK is presented.
KeywordsFacility location Matheuristic ILP
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under the agreement SCP2-GA-2013-614020 (LEANWIND: Logistic Efficiencies And Naval architecture for Wind Installations with Novel Developments).
- De Regt, D. N. (2012). Economic feasibility of offshore service locations for maintenance of offshore wind farms on the Dutch part of the North Sea. MSc thesis. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Irawan, C. A., Jones, D., & Ouelhadj, D. (2015). Bi-objective optimisation model for installation scheduling in offshore wind farms. Computers and Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.09.010i.
- Irawan, C. A., Salhi, S., Luis, M., & Azizi, N. (2017b). The continuous single source location problem with capacity and zone-dependent fixed cost: Models and solution approaches. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.004.
- Li, J., Ren, C., Dong, J., He, M., Wang, Q., Chen, F., et al. (2011). A Lagrangean-based heuristic for a two-stage facility location problem with handling costs. In IEEE international conference on service operations, logistics, and informatics (SOLI) (pp. 319–324).Google Scholar
- Lindqvist, M., & Lundin, J. (2010). Spare part logistics and optimization for wind turbines: Methods for cost-effective supply and storage. MS thesis. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Information Technology, Division of Systems and Control, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
- Mišković, S., & Stanimirović, Z. (2016). Solving the robust two-stage capacitated facility location problem with uncertain transportation costs. Optimization Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1036-2.
- Whitaker, R. A. (1983). A fast algorithm for the greedy interchange for large-scale clustering and median location problems. INFOR, 21, 95–108.Google Scholar