Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 273, Issue 1–2, pp 433–453 | Cite as

An optimization model for container inventory management

  • Mark Ching-Pong Poo
  • Tsz Leung YipEmail author
S.I.: OR in Transportation

Abstract

This paper formulates the empty container repositioning (ECR) problem, which is one of the most important issues in the container shipping industry, by running a model to generate the service route of feeder shipping in a dynamic environment. The objective is to reduce the disequilibrium of laden and empty containers. This paper first provides a literature review with the emphasis on the shipping scheduling and modelling of ECR. Second, a network model has been designed to find the optimum size of ship servicing a particular region. A simply ECR policy is tested to demonstrate an essential impact on the profit of a container transport system. With the aid of this heuristic shipping model, ECR is integrated with the tramp ship routing problem under dynamic condition.

Keywords

Empty container repositioning Container inventory management Artificial bee colony algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Guest Editors and two anonymous referees for their extremely helpful comments. This research was partially supported by Research Grant of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project Code G-YBEG).

References

  1. Di Francesco, M., Lai, M., & Zuddas, P. (2013). Maritime repositioning of empty containers under uncertain port disruptions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64, 827–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DNV, G. L. (2016). Maritime software. [Online] https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/software.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.
  3. Dong, J.-X., & Song, D.-P. (2012). Lease term optimization in container shipping systems. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 15(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong, J.-X., & Song, D.-P. (2012). Quantifying the impact of inland transport times on container fleet sizing in liner shipping services with uncertainties. OR Spectrum, 34(1), 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gass, S. I., & Fu, M. C. (2013). Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutchins, R. (2015). Less container ship capacity forecast to be scrapped. New York: Journal of Commerce.Google Scholar
  7. Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers. (2015). Containerisation, unitisation and intermodalism. In T. Mason (Ed.), Liner trades (pp. 103–128). London: Witherby Seamanship International Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Investment Weekly News. (2014). Research and markets; Ship fleet management system—market outlook report. [Online] http://search.proquest.com/docview/1626002420?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=16210. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.
  9. Karaboga, D. (2005). An idea based on honey bee swam for numerical optimization. Kayseri: Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department.Google Scholar
  10. Karaboga, D., & Basturk, B. (2007). A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization, 39(3), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, L., Wang, K. Y., & Yip, T. L. (2013). Development of a container port system in Pearl River Delta: Path to multi-gateway ports. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng, Q., & Wang, S. (2012). Liner ship fleet deployment with week-dependent container shipment demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng, Q., Wang, T., & Wang, S. (2012). Short-term liner ship fleet planning with container transshipment and uncertain container shipment demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(1), 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olivo, A., Di Francesco, M., & Zuddas, P. (2012). An optimization model for the inland repositioning of empty containers. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Progressive Digital Media Transportation News. (2015). OOCL orders six mega container vessels for $951.6m. London: Progressive Digital Media.Google Scholar
  16. PRWEB, (2013). Growth of Fleet Management Systems Market to 2018 Forecast at a CAGR of 22.8% in a New Research Available at ReportsnReports.com. [Online] http://www.prweb.com/releases/Fleet-management-systems/2018-FMS-forecast/prweb11038928.htm. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.
  17. Shui, C., & Szeto, W. (2015). An artificial bee colony algorithm for public bike repositioning. Sydney, The 37th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2015).Google Scholar
  18. Song, D.-P., & Dong, J.-X. (2011). Flow balancing-based empty container repositioning in typical shipping service routes. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 13, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Song, D.-P., & Dong, J.-X. (2012). Cargo routing and empty container repositioning in multiple shipping service routes. Transportation Research Part B, 46, 1556–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Song, D.-P., & Dong, J.-X. (2013). Long-haul liner service route design with ship deployment and empty container repositioning. Transportation Research Part B, 55, 188–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song, D.-P., & Dong, J.-X. (2015). Chapter 6 empty container repositioning. In C. Lee & Q. Meng (Eds.), Handbook of ocean container transport logistics (pp. 163–208). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime rconomics (3rd ed.). s.l.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Tran, N. K., & Haasis, H.-D. (2015). An empirical study of fleet expansion and growth of ship size in container liner shipping. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tran, N. K., & Haasis, H.-D. (2015). Literature survey of network optimization in container liner shipping. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 27(2), 139–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations. (2014). Review of maritime transport. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations. (2015). Review of maritime transport. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  27. Varelas, T., et al. (2013). Optimizing ship routing to maximize fleet revenue at Danaos. Interfaces, 47(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vojdani, N., Lootz, F., & Rösner, R. (2013). Optimizing empty container logistics based on a collaborative network approach. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(4), 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolff, J., Herz, N., & Flamig, H. (2012). Report on case study empty container logistics Hamburg-Baltic Sea region. Hamburg: Hamburg University of Technology.Google Scholar
  30. Xu, J. J., Yip, T. L., & Marlow, P. B. (2011). The dynamics between freight volatility and fleet size growth in dry bulk shipping markets. Transportation Research Part E, 47(6), 983–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yip, T. L., Sun, X. Y., & Liu, J. J. (2011). Group and individual heterogeneity in a stochastic frontier model: Container teminal operators. European Journal of Operational Research, 213, 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yip, T. L., & Wong, M. C. (2015). The Nicaragua Canal: Scenarios of its future roles. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, D. H., Yip, T. L., & Ng, C.-O. (2009). Predicting tsunami arrivals: Estimates and policy implications. Marine Policy, 33, 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine Research InstituteLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of BusinessThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations