Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 273, Issue 1–2, pp 607–650 | Cite as

An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers

  • Kannan GovindanEmail author
  • Vernika Agarwal
  • Jyoti Dhingra Darbari
  • P. C. Jha
OR in Transportation

Abstract

Due to rising concerns for environmental sustainability, the Indian electronic industry faces immense pressure to incorporate effective sustainable practices into the supply chain (SC) planning. Consequently, manufacturing enterprises (ME) are exploring the option of re-examining their SC strategies and taking a formalized approach towards a sustainable partnership with logistics providers. To begin with, it is imperative to associate with sustainable forward and reverse logistics providers to manage effectively the upward and downstream flows simultaneously. In this context, this paper proposes an integrated SC network for the evaluation and selection of forward distribution partners (FDP) and third party reverse logistic providers (3PRLP) from a sustainable perspective of an Indian electronic ME. The sustainable evaluation of the logistic partners is performed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution. The integrated logistics network is modeled as a bi-objective mixed-integer programming problem with the objective of maximizing the profit of the manufacturer and maximizing the sustainable score of the selected forward and reverse logistics providers. The novelty of the study is its ranking of the FDPs and 3PRLPs on the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability and the simultaneous integration of logistics outsourcing decisions for the forward and reverse flow of products. Goal programming approach is utilized to capture the trade-off between the conflicting objectives and to attain a satisfying solution to the bi-objective problem. The results indicate that integrating the strategic decisions of selection of logistics partners with the operational flow planning decisions can immensely improve the sustainable performance value of the SC network and secure reasonable profits. The managerial implications drawn from the result analysis provide a sustainable framework to the ME for enhancing its corporate image.

Keywords

FAHP TOPSIS Outsourcing Sustainability FDP 3PRLP 

References

  1. Abbasi, M., & Nilsson, F. (2016). Developing environmentally sustainable logistics: Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers’ perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 273–283.Google Scholar
  2. Abdur Razzaque, M., & Chen Sheng, C. (1998). Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(2), 89–107.Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal, V., Govindan, K., Darbari, J. D., & Jha, P. C. (2016). An optimization model for sustainable solutions towards implementation of reverse logistics under collaborative framework. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 7(4), 480–487.Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2015). A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 76–92.Google Scholar
  5. Aguezzoul, A. (2014). Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, 69–78.Google Scholar
  6. Aktas, E., Agaran, B., Ulengin, F., & Onsel, S. (2011). The use of outsourcing logistics activities: The case of turkey. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(5), 833–852.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, E. J., Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., & Keating, B. (2011). What drives the choice of a third-party logistics provider? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 97–115.Google Scholar
  8. Asuquo, M., Coward, I., & Yang, Z. (2014). Modeling selection of third party ship management services. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
  9. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370–378.Google Scholar
  10. Awasthi, A. K., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2016). Relationship between e-waste recycling and human health risk in India: A critical review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(12), 11509–11532.Google Scholar
  11. Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.Google Scholar
  12. Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294–308.Google Scholar
  13. Bourlakis, M., & Melewar, T. C. (2011). Marketing perspectives of logistics service providers: Present and future research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 300–310.Google Scholar
  14. Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., & Nebol, E. (2008). Selection of the Strategic Alliance Partner in LogisticsValue Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 148–158.Google Scholar
  15. Chang, C. T. (2007). Multi-choice goal programming. Omega, 35(4), 389–396.Google Scholar
  16. Chu, Z., & Wang, Q. (2012). Drivers of relationship quality in logistics outsourcing in China. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3), 78–96.Google Scholar
  17. Colicchia, C., Marchet, G., Melacini, M., & Perotti, S. (2013). Building environmental sustainability: Empirical evidence from Logistics Service Providers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 197–209.Google Scholar
  18. CPCB 2014 Annual Report 2014-15. http://cpcb.nic.in/annualreport.php. Accessed on 02 Apr 2017.
  19. Dapiran, P., Lieb, R., Millen, R., & Sohal, A. (1996). Third party logistics services usage by large Australian firms. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(10), 36–45.Google Scholar
  20. Daugherty, P. J., & Dröge, C. (1997). Organizational structure in divisionalized manufacturers: The potential for outsourcing logistical services. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 27(5/6), 337–349.Google Scholar
  21. Dou, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2010). A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 567–592.Google Scholar
  22. Efendigil, T., Önüt, S., & Kongar, E. (2008). A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 54(2), 269–287.Google Scholar
  23. Evangelista, P. (2014). Environmental sustainability practices in the transport and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 12, 63–72.Google Scholar
  24. Evangelista, P., & Durst, S. (2015). Knowledge management in environmental sustainability practices of third-party logistics service providers. VINE, 45(4), 509–529.Google Scholar
  25. Falsini, D., Fondi, F., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2012). A logistics provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA and linear programming integration. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4822–4829.Google Scholar
  26. Farzipoor Saen, R. (2009). A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2(2), 180–190.Google Scholar
  27. Garg, C. P. (2016). A robust hybrid decision model for evaluation and selection of the strategic alliance partner in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 55–66.Google Scholar
  28. Giri, B. C., & Sarker, B. R. (2017). Improving performance by coordinating a supply chain with third party logistics outsourcing under production disruption. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 103, 168–177.Google Scholar
  29. Global Reporting Initiative. (2000). Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental, and social performance.Google Scholar
  30. Göl, H., & Çatay, B. (2007). Third-party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 379–384.Google Scholar
  31. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013a). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.Google Scholar
  32. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2016). A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(4), 690–722.Google Scholar
  33. Govindan, K., Palaniappan, M., Zhu, Q., & Kannan, D. (2012). Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 204–211.Google Scholar
  34. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83.Google Scholar
  35. Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Palaniappan, M. (2013b). An analytic network process-based multicriteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(1–4), 863–880.Google Scholar
  36. Hsiao, H., Kemp, R. G. M., Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & Omta, S. O. (2010). A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 75–86.Google Scholar
  37. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  38. Işıklar, G., Alptekin, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2007). Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 34(12), 3701–3714.Google Scholar
  39. Jakhar, S. K., & Barua, M. K. (2014). An integrated model of supply chain performance evaluation and decision-making using structural equation modelling and fuzzy AHP. Production Planning and Control, 25(11), 938–957.Google Scholar
  40. Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), 274–289.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, D., & Tamiz, M. (2010). Practical goal programming (Vol. 141). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Jumadi, H., & Zailani, S. (2010). Integrating green innovations in logistics services towards logistics service sustainability: A conceptual paper. Environmental Research Journal, 4(4), 261–271.Google Scholar
  43. Kannan, G. (2009). Fuzzy approach for the selection of third party reverse logistics provider. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(3), 397–416.Google Scholar
  44. Kannan, D. (2017). Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics (in press).Google Scholar
  45. Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447.Google Scholar
  46. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Shankar, M. (2016). India: Formalize recycling of electronic waste. Nature, 530(7590), 281–281.Google Scholar
  47. Ko, H. J., & Evans, G. W. (2007). A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs. Computers and Operations Research, 34(2), 346–366.Google Scholar
  48. Krumwiede, D. W., & Sheu, C. (2002). A model for reverse logistics entry by third-party providers. Omega, 30(5), 325–333.Google Scholar
  49. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), 287–303.Google Scholar
  50. Kumar, A., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109–123.Google Scholar
  51. Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367–377.Google Scholar
  52. Lambert, S., Riopel, D., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2011). A reverse logistics decisions conceptual framework. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 561–581.Google Scholar
  53. Langella, I. M., & Zanoni, S. (2011). Eco-efficiency in logistics: A case study on distribution network design. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(02), 115–126.Google Scholar
  54. Lieb, K. J., & Lieb, R. C. (2010). Environmental sustainability in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40(7), 524–533.Google Scholar
  55. Li, F., Li, L., Jin, C., Wang, R., Wang, H., & Yang, L. (2012). A 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets. Computers and Operations Research, 39(8), 1879–1884.Google Scholar
  56. Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 67–83.Google Scholar
  57. Liu, H. T., & Wang, W. K. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4387–4398.Google Scholar
  58. Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2015). Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 375–390.Google Scholar
  59. Marchet, G., Melacini, M., & Perotti, S. (2014). Environmental sustainability in logistics and freight transportation: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(6), 775–811.Google Scholar
  60. Martin, P., Guide, V. D. R, Jr., & Craighead, C. W. (2010). Supply chain sourcing in remanufacturing operations: An empirical investigation of remake versus buy. Decision Sciences, 41(2), 301–324.Google Scholar
  61. Mathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resources, Conservation and Recycling (in press).Google Scholar
  62. Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., & Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91, 1–18.Google Scholar
  63. Meade, L., & Sarkis, J. (2002). A conceptual model for selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(5), 283–295.Google Scholar
  64. Millen, R., Sohal, A., Dapiran, P., Lieb, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (1997). Benchmarking Australian firms’ usage of contract logistics services: A comparison with American and Western European practice. Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 4(1), 34–46.Google Scholar
  65. MoEF. (2012–2013). Annual report. Environmental Information System (ENVIS), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, India Offset Press, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  66. Mortensen, O., & Lemoine, O. W. (2008). Integration between manufacturers and third party logistics providers? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 28(4), 331–359.Google Scholar
  67. Nepal, B., Yadav, O. P., & Murat, A. (2010). A fuzzy-AHP approach to prioritization of CS attributes in target planning for automotive product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 6775–6786.Google Scholar
  68. Niknejad, A., & Petrovic, D. (2014). Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(1), 143–154.Google Scholar
  69. Nikolaou, I. E., Evangelinos, K. I., & Allan, S. (2013). A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 173–184.Google Scholar
  70. Perçin, S. (2009). Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), 588–604.Google Scholar
  71. Perçin, S., & Min, H. (2013). A hybrid quality function deployment and fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16(5), 380–397.Google Scholar
  72. Perotti, S., Zorzini, M., Cagno, E., & Micheli, G. J. (2012). Green supply chain practices and company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(7), 640–672.Google Scholar
  73. Pishvaee, M. S., Farahani, R. Z., & Dullaert, W. (2010). A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Computers and operations research, 37(6), 1100–1112.Google Scholar
  74. Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2016a). A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7, 66–78.Google Scholar
  75. Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2016b). An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 108, 63–81.Google Scholar
  76. Romero, C. (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega, 29(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
  77. Romero, C. (2014). Handbook of critical issues in goal programming. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  78. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1996). The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques. International Journal of Forecasting, 12(1), 73–89.Google Scholar
  79. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  80. Sasikumar, P., & Haq, A. N. (2011). Integration of closed loop distribution supply chain network and 3PRLP selection for the case of battery recycling. International Journal of Production Research, 49(11), 3363–3385.Google Scholar
  81. Selviaridis, K., & Spring, M. (2007). Third party logistics: A literature review and research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(1), 125–150.Google Scholar
  82. Senthil, S., Srirangacharyulu, B., & Ramesh, A. (2014). A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 50–58.Google Scholar
  83. Serrato, M. A., Ryan, S. M., & Gaytan, J. (2007). A Markov decision model to evaluate outsourcing in reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4289–4315.Google Scholar
  84. Shankar, K. M., Kannan, D., & Kumar, P. U. (2017). Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices–A case study in Indian context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1332–1343.Google Scholar
  85. Shankar, K. M., Kumar, P. U., & Kannan, D. (2016). Analyzing the drivers of advanced sustainable manufacturing system using AHP approach. Sustainability, 8(8), 824.Google Scholar
  86. Sharma, S. K., & Kumar, V. (2015). Optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers using quality function deployment and Taguchi loss function. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(7), 1281–1300.Google Scholar
  87. Sivakumar, R., Kannan, D., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry. Resources Policy, 46, 64–75.Google Scholar
  88. Tavana, M., Zareinejad, M., Di Caprio, D., & Kaviani, M. A. (2016). An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 544–557.Google Scholar
  89. Tian, Y., Zantow, K., & Fan, C. (2009). A framework of supplier selection of integrative logistics providers. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 7(2), 200–214.Google Scholar
  90. Torfi, F., Farahani, R. Z., & Rezapour, S. (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 10(2), 520–528.Google Scholar
  91. Wang, T. C., & Lee, H. D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980–8985.Google Scholar
  92. Wan, S. P., Wang, F., Lin, L. L., & Dong, J. Y. (2015). An intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming method for logistics outsourcing provider selection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 82, 80–94.Google Scholar
  93. Wath, S. B., Vaidya, A. N., Dutt, P. S., & Chakrabarti, T. (2010). A roadmap for development of sustainable E-waste management system in India. Science of the Total Environment, 409(1), 19–32.Google Scholar
  94. Winter, M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2013). Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management: Current state and opportunities for future inquiry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43(1), 18–38.Google Scholar
  95. Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2016). Partner selection for reverse logistics centres in green supply chains: A fuzzy artificial immune optimisation approach. Production Planning and Control, 27(16), 1356–1372.Google Scholar
  96. Wu, F., Li, H. Z., Chu, L. K., & Sculli, D. (2005). An outsourcing decision model for sustaining long-term performance. International Journal of Production Research, 43(12), 2513–2535.Google Scholar
  97. Xu, L., Kumar, D. T., Shankar, K. M., Kannan, D., & Chen, G. (2013). Analyzing criteria and sub-criteria for the corporate social responsibility-based supplier selection process using AHP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(1–4), 907–916.Google Scholar
  98. Yang, D. H., Kim, S., Nam, C., & Min, J. W. (2007). Developing a decision model for business process outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 34(12), 3769–3778.Google Scholar
  99. Yayla, A. Y., Oztekin, A., Gumus, A. T., & Gunasekaran, A. (2015). A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6097–6113.Google Scholar
  100. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338–353.Google Scholar
  101. Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kannan Govindan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vernika Agarwal
    • 2
  • Jyoti Dhingra Darbari
    • 2
  • P. C. Jha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Technology and InnovationUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Operational ResearchUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations