Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 283, Issue 1–2, pp 543–560 | Cite as

Theory in humanitarian operations research

  • Richard OloruntobaEmail author
  • Gazi Farid Hossain
  • Beverly Wagner
Applications of OR in Disaster Relief Operations

Abstract

Academic research on humanitarian operations (HO) is growing (Anaya-Arenas et al. in Ann Oper Res 223(1):53–79, 2014; Burkart et al. in Ann Oper Res 1–21, 2016; Duhamel et al. in Ann Oper Res 1–21, 2016). However, attention to and use of relevant theories in associated research is limited (Richey Jr in Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 39(7):619–628, 2009). Theories are valuable for cultivating a deeper scholarly understanding of a concept such as humanitarian operations. As such, this paper advocates increased deployment of theory in humanitarian operations research. The paper suggests and analyzes three social science and management theories as worthy of consideration by scholars and practitioners. The paper generates and stimulates new theory driven research ideas and outlines potential directions for future theoretically rigorous investigations of the practice of operations management in humanitarian contexts.

Keywords

Humanitarian operations Humanitarian logistics Humanitarian supply chains Theory 

References

  1. Ågerfalk, P. J. (2014). Insufficient theoretical contribution: A conclusive rationale for rejection? European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 593–599.Google Scholar
  2. Anaya-Arenas, A. M., Renaud, J., & Ruiz, A. (2014). Relief distribution networks: A systematic review. Annals of Operations Research, 223(1), 53–79.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., & Coughlan, A. T. (1987). International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 51, 71–82.Google Scholar
  4. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2016). Why we need theory in the organization sciences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1126–1131.Google Scholar
  5. Asmussen, C. G., Pedersen, T., & Dhanaraj, C. (2009). Host country environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 42–57.Google Scholar
  6. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496–515.Google Scholar
  7. Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
  8. Biggart, N. W., & Delbridge, R. (2004). Systems of exchange. Academy of Management Review, 29, 28–49.Google Scholar
  9. Burkart, C., Nolz, P. C., & Gutjahr, W. J. (2016). Modelling beneficiaries’ choice in disaster relief logistics. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-2097-9.Google Scholar
  10. Cabrera-Suárez, K. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor’s development in the family firm. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 71–96.Google Scholar
  11. Cadieux, L., Lorrain, J., & Hugron, P. (2002). Succession in women-owned businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17–30.Google Scholar
  12. Calhoun, M. A. (2002). Unpacking liability of foreignness: Identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 301–321.Google Scholar
  13. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Sharma, P., & Yoder, T. R. (2009). Guiding family business succession through the succession process: A step-by-step guide for CPA advisors. CPA Journal, 79, 48–51.Google Scholar
  14. Churchill, N. C., & Hatten, K. J. (1997). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. Family Business Review, 10(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309–1335.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.Google Scholar
  18. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
  19. Day, J. M., Melnyk, S. A., Larson, P. D., Davis, E. W., & Whybark, D. C. (2012). Humanitarian and disaster relief supply chains: A matter of life and death. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 21–36.Google Scholar
  20. Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: Agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
  21. Duhamel, C., Santos, A. C., Brasil, D., Châtelet, E., & Birregah, B. (2016). Connecting a population dynamic model with a multi-period location–allocation problem for post-disaster relief operations. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-2104-1.Google Scholar
  22. Dunning, J. H. (2003). Some antecedents of internationalization theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 108–115.Google Scholar
  23. Dyck, B., Mauws, M., Starke, F. A., & Mischke, G. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143–162.Google Scholar
  24. Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535–556.Google Scholar
  25. EJOR. (2016). Proposal special issue on OR applied to humanitarian operations. European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) Call for Papers http://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-operational-research/call-for-papers/call-for-papers-or-applied-to-humanitarian-operations. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.
  26. Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.Google Scholar
  28. Fawcett, S. E., & Waller, M. A. (2011). Making sense out of chaos: Why theory is relevant to supply chain research. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  29. Fawcett, S. E., & Waller, M. A. (2015). Designing the supply chain for success at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(3), 233–239.Google Scholar
  30. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux. ISBN - 10:0312425074.Google Scholar
  32. George, G. (2015). Expanding context to redefine theories: Africa in management research. Management and Organization Review, 11, 5–10.Google Scholar
  33. George, G., Corbishley, C., Khayesi, J. N., Haas, M. R., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Bringing Africa in: Promising directions for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 377–393.Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
  35. Groves, K. S. (2007). Integrating leadership development and succession planning best practices. Journal of Management Development, 26(3), 239–260.Google Scholar
  36. Hambrick, D. (2007a). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1345–1352.Google Scholar
  37. Hambrick, D. C. (2007b). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.Google Scholar
  38. Hens, L. (2012). Overcoming institutional distance: Expansion to base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1692–1699.Google Scholar
  39. Hilhorst, D. (2003). Responding to disasters: Diversity of bureaucrats, technocrats and local people. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21(1), 37–56.Google Scholar
  40. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J. L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467.Google Scholar
  41. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.Google Scholar
  42. Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., & Connelly, B. L. (2006). International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831–867.Google Scholar
  43. Hobbs, J. E. (1996). A transaction cost approach to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1(2), 15–27.Google Scholar
  44. Hohenthal, J., Johanson, J., & Johanson, M. (2014). Network knowledge and business-relationship value in the foreign market. International Business Review, 23(1), 4–19.Google Scholar
  45. Horn, S. A. (2015). The social and psychological costs of peer review stress and coping with manuscript rejection. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1056492615586597 http://jmi.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/05/18/1056492615586597.full.pdf+html. Accessed 17 Aug 2016.
  46. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456.Google Scholar
  47. Huffman, K., & Dowdell, K. (2015). Psychology in action (11th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jahre, M., Jensen, L. M., & Listou, T. (2009). Theory development in humanitarian logistics: A framework and three cases. Management Research News, 32(11), 1008–1023.Google Scholar
  50. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.Google Scholar
  51. Jola-Sanchez, A. F., Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., Bretthauer, K. M., & Britto, R. A. (2016). Effect of armed conflicts on humanitarian operations: Total factor productivity and efficiency of rural hospitals. Journal of Operations Management, 45, 73–85.Google Scholar
  52. Kamradt-Scott, A. (2016). WHO’s to blame? The World Health Organization and the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Third World Quarterly, 37(3), 401–418.Google Scholar
  53. Karatas-Cetin, C., & Denktas-Sakar, G. (2013). Logistics research beyond 2000: Theory, method and relevance. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(2), 125–144.Google Scholar
  54. Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(2), 99–114.Google Scholar
  55. Kunz, N., & Reiner, G. (2012). A meta-analysis of humanitarian logistics research. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2(2), 116–147.Google Scholar
  56. Langfield-Smith, K., & Smith, D. (2003). Management control systems and trust in outsourcing relationships. Management Accounting Research, 14(3), 281–307.Google Scholar
  57. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305–328.Google Scholar
  58. L’Hermitte, C., Tatham, P. H., & Bowles, M. (2014). Classifying logistics relevant disasters: Conceptual model and empirical investigation. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 155–178.Google Scholar
  59. McGuinness, T. (1994). Markets and managerial hierarchies. In G. Thompson, et al. (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies and networks (pp. 66–81). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Meixell, M. J., & Gargeya, V. B. (2005). Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique. Transportation Research, 41(6), 531–550.Google Scholar
  61. Muller, A. R., Pfarrer, M. D., & Little, L. M. (2014). A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  62. Naim, M. M., & Gosling, J. (2011). On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 342–354.Google Scholar
  63. Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K., Bau, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087–1122.Google Scholar
  64. Oloruntoba, R. (2016). Boko Haram: Challenges and techniques of distributing aid in security challenged environments. In G. Kovacs & I. Haavisto (Eds.), Supply chain management for humanitarians: Tools for practice. London: Kogan.Google Scholar
  65. Oloruntoba, R., & Banomyong, R. (2016). Logistics and SCM in the context of relief for refugees and internally displaced persons IDPs. Special issue call for papers from Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Emerald Group Publishing. http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/call_for_papers.htm?id=6790. Accessed 2 Dec 2016.
  66. Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2003). Humanitarian aid organisations and logistics. Corby: The Institute of Logistics and Transport.Google Scholar
  67. Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2006). Humanitarian aid: An agile supply chain? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 115–120.Google Scholar
  68. Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2009). Customer service in emergency relief chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(6), 486–505.Google Scholar
  69. Oloruntoba, R., & Kovács, G. (2015). A commentary on agility in humanitarian aid supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 708–716.Google Scholar
  70. Özdamar, L., & Ertem, M. A. (2015). Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  71. Parkhe, A. (2003). Institutional environments, institutional change, and international alliances. Journal of International Management, 9(3), 305–316.Google Scholar
  72. Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Vehicle replacement in the International Committee of the Red Cross. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 365–376.Google Scholar
  73. Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Empirically grounded research in humanitarian operations management: The way forward. Journal of Operations Management, 45(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
  74. Prasad, S., Zakaria, R., & Altay, N. (2016). Big data in humanitarian supply chain networks: A resource dependence perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 1–31. doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2280-7.Google Scholar
  75. Richey, G, Jr. (2009). The supply chain crisis and disaster pyramid: A theoretical framework for understanding preparedness and recovery. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(7), 619–628.Google Scholar
  76. Rynes, S., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340–356.Google Scholar
  77. Santora, J. C., Sarros, J. C., Bozer, G., Esposito, M., & Bassi, A. (2015). Non-profit executive succession planning and organizational sustainability: A preliminary comparative study in Australia, Brazil, Israel, Italy, Russia, and the United States. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 66.Google Scholar
  78. Santos-Peñate, D. R. (2016). Location analysis. Annals of Operation Research, 246(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  79. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1–16.Google Scholar
  80. Sinkovics, R. R., Zagelmeyer, S., & Kusstatscher, V. (2011). Between merger and syndrome: The intermediary role of emotions in four cross-border M&As. International Business Review, 20(1), 27–47.Google Scholar
  81. Suddaby, R. (2015). Editor’s comments: Why theory? Academy of Management Review, 4015(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  82. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not? Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.Google Scholar
  83. Tatham, P., & Houghton, L. (2011). The wicked problem of humanitarian logistics and disaster relief aid. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
  84. Tatham, P., & Kovács, G. (2010). The application of “swift trust” to humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  85. Thomas, A. (2003). Humanitarian logistics: Enabling disaster response. Fritz Institute, San Francisco.http://www.fritzinstitute.org/pdfs/whitepaper/enablingdisasterresponse.pdf. 17 Nov 2016.
  86. Thomas, A. (2004). Elevating humanitarian logistics. International Aid & Trade Review 102–106. http://www.fritzinstitute.org/PDFs/InTheNews/2004/AidandTrade_0104.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  87. Thomas, A., & Kopczak, L. (2005). From logistics to supply chain management: The path forward to the humanitarian sector. San Francisco: Fritz Institute.Google Scholar
  88. Turner, J. (2003). The structure of sociological theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  89. Ülkü, M. A., Bell, K. M., & Wilson, S. G. (2015). Modelling the impact of donor behavior on humanitarian aid operations. Annals of Operations Research, 230(1), 153–168.Google Scholar
  90. Vega, D., & Roussat, C. (2015). Humanitarian logistics: The role of logistics service providers. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(4), 352–375.Google Scholar
  91. Walsh, J. P. (2015). Organization and management scholarship in and for Africa... and the World. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  92. Wang, X., Wu, Y., Liang, L., & Huang, Z. (2016). Service outsourcing and disaster response methods in a relief supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 471–487.Google Scholar
  93. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.Google Scholar
  94. Whipple, J. M., Griffis, S. E., & Daugherty, P. J. (2013). Conceptualizations of trust: Can we trust them? Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
  95. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  96. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–575.Google Scholar
  97. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Williamson, O. E. (2008). Outsourcing: Transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(2), 5–16.Google Scholar
  99. Wright, P. M. (2015). Rethinking “Contribution”. Journal of Management, 41(3), 765–768.Google Scholar
  100. Yang, F., Yuan, Q., Du, S., & Liang, L. (2015). Reserving relief supplies for earthquake: A multi-attribute decision making of China Red Cross. Annals of Operations Research, 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1749-5.Google Scholar
  101. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.Google Scholar
  102. Zsidisin, G., & Ellram, L. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 15–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Oloruntoba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gazi Farid Hossain
    • 1
  • Beverly Wagner
    • 2
  1. 1.Newcastle Business SchoolThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Marketing, Stenshouse WingUniversity of Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations