Advertisement

“All the world’s a stage”: incongruity humour revisited

  • Anton Nijholt
Open Access
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Eighteenth and nineteenth century philosophers took interest in humour and, in particular, humorous incongruities. Humour was not necessarily their main interest; however, observations on humour could support their more general philosophical theories. Spontaneous and unintentional humour such as anecdotes, witty remarks and absurd events were the styles of humour that they analysed and made part of their theories. Prepared humour such as verbal jokes were rarely included in their observations, likely dismissed as too vulgar and not requiring intellectual effort. Humour, as analysed by several eighteenth and nineteenth century philosophers, was seen as part of daily life or life simulated on stage. In the twentieth century, Freud emphasized a possible ‘relief’ function of ‘prepared’ humour such as jokes. Additionally, linguists began developing theories to analyse jokes. A joke has a particular structure that is constructed with the aim of achieving a humorous effect. This structure makes jokes suitable for linguistic analysis. In the present-day humour research, jokes have become a main topic of research. This linguistically oriented joke research neglects many other forms of humour: spontaneous humour, non-verbal humour, physical humour, and many forms of unintentional humour that appear in real life. We want to survey and re-evaluate the contributions to the humour research of these eighteenth, nineteenth and early twentieth century philosophers and clarify that their more general contributions to the humour research have been neglected in favour of the very restricted form of prepared humour and linguistically expressed and analysed humour as it appears in jokes. We hope that the views expressed in this paper will help to steer the humour research away from joke research and help to integrate humour in the design of human-computer interfaces and smart environments. That is, rather than considering only verbal jokes, we should aim at generating smart environments that understand, facilitate or create humour that goes beyond jokes.

Keywords

Philosophy of humour Incongruity humour Humour theories Human-computer interaction Human-robot interaction Computational humour Smart environments 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

01-02 68T01 68T50 91C99 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I’m grateful to the referees for pointing out some errors in an earlier version of the paper and for their suggestions to improve it. In this paper there are many citations taken from books that were published centuries ago. For that reason spelling and grammatical structure can sometimes differ from modern English. I’m grateful to Google for making many of these old texts available in the public domain.

References

  1. 1.
    Morreall, J.: Philosophy of humor. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/index.html (2016)
  2. 2.
    Larkin-Galiñanes, C.: An overview of humor theory. In: Attardo, S (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nijholt, A.: From word play to world play: introducing humor in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE’18), pp 1–8. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willmann, J.M.: An analysis of humor and laughter. Am. J. Psychol. 53, 70–85 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wyer, R.S., Collins, J.E.: A theory of humor elicitation. Psychol. Rev. 99(4), 663–688 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Critchley, S.: On Humour. Routledge, London (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morreall, J.: Comic Relief: a Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nijholt, A.: Smart bugs and digital banana peels: accidental humor in smart environments? In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) Distributed, Ambient and pervasive Interactions (DAPI 2016). LNCS, vol. 9749, pp 329–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nijholt, A.: Designed and accidental humor in the smart digital wild. In: Fifteenth International Symposium on Comunicación Social: retos y perspectivas. Nuevos estudios sobre Comunicación Social, pp 310–317. Centro de Lingüística Aplicada, Santiago de Cuba (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hobbes, T.: Human nature or the fundamental elements of policy, being a discovery of the faculties acts and passions of the soul of man from their original causes according to such philosophical principles as are not commonly known or asserted (1640)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hobbes, T.: Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London, printed for Andrew Crooke, at the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church-yard (1651)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Congreve, W.: Concerning humour in comedy. Letter from Mr. Congreve, to Mr. Dennis, dated 10 July 1695. In: McKenzie, D.F. (ed.) The Works of William Congreve, vol. 3, pp. 63–72. Oxford University Press (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaftesbury, Earl of (Anthony Ashely Cooper): essay on the freedom of wit and humour. In: Characters of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, vol. I. Essay was first printed in 1709 (1737)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amir, L.B.: Humor and the good life in modern philosophy: Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard., State University of New York Press, Albany, p. 4 (2014). Addison J.: Difference between True and False Humour. The Spectator, No. 35, April 10 (1711)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, J.B.: The Spectator, in Miniature, Being the Principal Religious, Moral, Humourous, Satirical and Critical Essays, in that Publication. Compressed Into Two Volumes, pp. 69–72 (1839)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Addison, J.: Pleasures of the Imagination. The Spectator Nos. 411–421 (1712)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hutcheson, F.: Reflections upon laughter, and remarks upon “The Fable of the Bees” (Glasgow, 1750), Printed by R. Urie, For Daniel Baxter, Bookseller. Originally published in The Dublin Journal in 1725. Also (as appendix) in Kivy, P. (ed.) Francis Hutcheson: An Inquiry Concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony, Design. International Archives of the History of Ideas. Series Minor 9, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1973)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Akenside, M.: The Pleasures of Imagination. A Poem in Three Books. Printed for R. Dodsley at Tully’s Head in Pall-Mall, London (1744)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whitehead, W.: An Essay on Ridicule. Printed for R. Dodsley at Tully’s Head in Pall-Mall, London (1743)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morris, C.: Essay Towards Fixing the True Standards of Wit, Humour, Raillery, Satire, and Ridicule. London: Printed for J. Roberts, at the Oxford-Arms, in Warwick-lane; and W. Bickerton, in the Temple-Exchange, near the Inner-Temple-Gate, Fleet-Street. MDCCXLIV (1744)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramsay, A.: An Essay on Ridicule. Printed for A. Millar in the Strand, London (1753)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beattie, J.: Essay on Laughter and Ludicrous Composition. Written in the Year 1764. Printed for William Creech, Edinburgh; and for E. & C. Dilly, London (1776)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Preston, W.: Essay on ridicule, wit and humour. Part the first. Trans. R. Ir. Acad. 2, 69–90 (1788)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blackmore, R.: An essay upon wit. In: Essays Upon Several Subjects, London (1716)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wickberg, D.: The Senses of Humor: Self and Laughter in Modern America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldsmith, O.: An Enquiry into the Present State of Polite Learning in Europe. London (1759)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Redwood, J.: Reason, ridicule and religion: the age of enlightenment in England, 1660–1750. Thames and Hudson, London (1976)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., Proyer, R.T.: Broadening humor: comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Front. Psychol. 9(6), 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith, S.: Lectures X and XI. On wit and humour. In: Elementary Sketches of Moral Philosophy, delivered at The Royal Institution, in the Years 1804, 1805, and 1806, by the late Rev. Sydney Smith, M.A. Spottiswoodes and Shaw, New-street-Square, London, 114–152 (1849)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hunt, L.: Wit and humour, selected from the English poets: with an illustrative essay, and critical comments, vol. 65. Cornhill, London (1846)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hazlitt, W.: Lecture I.—Introduction. On Wit and Humour, 3d edn, pp 1–55. John Templeman, London (1841)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kant, I.: . In: Guyer, P. (ed.) Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kant, I.: Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Herausgegeben von der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band XXV, Vierte Abteilung, Vorlesungen. Zweiter Band, Erste Hälfte, Berlin, 1997, Vorlesungen Über Anthropologie. Walter de Gruyter, p. 347 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schopenhauer, A.: The world as will and idea. Volume I, Paragraph 13 (1818). Seventh Edition. Translated from the German by R.B. Haldane and J. Kemp. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., London (1909)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schopenhauer, A.: The world as will and idea. Volume II, Chapter VIII. On The Theory Of The Ludicrous (1819). Seventh Edition. Translated from the German by R.B. Haldane and J. Kemp. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., London (1909)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kierkegaard, S.: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Edited and Translated by Alastair Hannay. Originally published in 1846, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bain, A.: The Emotions and the Will. Longman, London (1859)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spencer, H.: The physiology of laughter. Macmillan’s Mag. 1, 395–402 (1860)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Freud, S.: Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious. Translation by J. Strachey. W.W. Norton, New York (1960) (Original work published) (1905)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mélinaud, C.: Pourquoi rit-on. Revue de deux mondes (1895)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bergson, H.: Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic. Translated from Le Rire: Essai sur la signification du comique. Gutenberg project (2003). Original edition appeared in 1900Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Milner Davis, J.: Bergson and the theory of the comic. In: Attardo, S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, vol. 1, pp 77–80. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carroll, N.: Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Atkinson, C.: What’s so funny? Or, why humor should matter to philosophers. Philos. Today 50(4), 437–443 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Junco, M.A.: Designing the incorrect. (Design and graphic humor). Design Discourse III(2), 1–16 (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Steinert, S.: Technology is a laughing matter: Bergson, the comic and technology. AI Soc. 32, 201–208 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Eastman, M.: The Sense of Humor. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York (1922)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Eastman, M.: Enjoyment of Laughter. Hamish Hamilton Publisher, London (1937)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chesterton, G.K.: Humour, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th edn, XI, 883-5, p. 883 (1929)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goldstein, J.H., McGhee, P.E.: The Psychology of Humor. Academic Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chapman, A.J., Foot, H.C. (eds.): It’s a funny thing, humour. In: International Conference on Humour & Laughter. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Suls, J.M.: A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons an information-processing analysis. In: Goldstein, J.H., McGhee, P.E. (eds.) The Psychology of Humor Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, pp 81–100. Academic Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June 1974. In: Winston, P. (ed.) Reprinted in The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill (1975)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.: Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Minsky, M.: Jokes and the logic of the cognitive unconscious. In: Vaina, L., Hintikka, J (eds.) Cognitive Constraints on Communication. Synthese Language Library (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy), vol. 18. Springer, Dordrecht (1980)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Raskin, V.: Semantic mechanisms of humor. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp 325–335 (1979)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Raskin, V.: Semantic Mechanisms of Humor, Springer Science & Business Media, Springer, Berlin, Germany; originally D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1985)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Attardo, S., Raskin, V.: Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor 4(3–4), 293–347 (1991)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Raskin, V., Hempelmann, C.F., Taylor, J.M.: How to understand and assess a theory: the evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and Now into the OSTH. J. Lit. Theory 3(2), 285–312 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.016 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hofstadter, D., Gabora, L.: Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition. Humor 2(4), 417–440 (1989)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hulstijn, J., Nijholt, A. (eds.): Computational humor: automatic interpretation and generation of verbal humor. In: Proceedings Twente Workshop on Language Technology 12 (TWLT12). University of Twente, The Netherlands (1996)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stock, O., Strapparava, C., Nijholt, A. (eds.): The April Fools’ Day Workshop on Computational Humour. ITC-IRST, Trento (2002)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nijholt, A. (ed.): Computational Humor 2012. In: Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Computational Humor. CTIT Workshop Proceedings WP12-02. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology University of Twente (2012)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Binsted, K., Ritchie, G.: An implemented model of punning riddles. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 1) (AAAI ’94), pp 633–638. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park (1994)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Binsted, K.: Using humor to make natural language interfaces more friendly. In: Proceedings of AI, ALife, and Entertainment Workshop, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Morkes, J., Kernal, H.K., Nass, C.: Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: a direct test of SRCT theory. Hum. Comput. Interact. 14(4), 395–435 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nijholt, A.: Conversational agents and the construction of humorous acts. Chapter 2. In: Nishida, T (ed.) Conversational Informatics: An Engineering Approach, pp 21–47. Wiley, Chicester (2007)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tinholt, H.W., Nijholt, A.: Computational humour: utilizing cross-reference ambiguity for conversational jokes. In: Masulli, F., Mitra, S., Pasi, G (eds.) 7th International Workshop on Fuzzy Logic and Applications (WILF 2007), LNAI 4578, pp 477–483. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Stock, O., Strapparava, C.: Laughing with HAHAcronym, a computational humor system. In: Cohn, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2 (AAAI’06), vol. 2, pp 1675–1678. AAAI Press (2006)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mihalcea, R., Strapparava, C.: Learning to laugh (automatically): computational models for humor recognition. Comput. Intell. 22(2), 126–142 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gatti, L., Özbal, G., Guerini, M., Stock, O., Strapparava, C.: Heady-lines: a creative generator of newspaper headlines. In: Companion Publication of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’16 Companion), pp 79–83. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Gatti, L., Özbal, G., Stock, O., Strapparava, C.: Automatic generation of lyrics parodies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Multimedia Conference (MM ’17), pp 485–491. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Veale, T., Valitutti, A., Li, G.: Twitter: the best of both worlds for automated wit. In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions. DAPI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9189, pp 689–699. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Berger, A.A.: An Anatomy of Humor. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1993). First edition appeared in 1976Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Buijzen, M., Valkenburg, P.: Developing a typology of humor in audiovisual media. Media Psychol. 6(2), 147–167 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vandaele, J.: Humor Mechanisms in Film Comedy: Incongruity and Superiority. Poetics Today 23:2, pp 221–249. Duke University Press, Durham (2002)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Morreall, J.: Taking Laughter Seriously. State University of New York Press, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Nijholt, A.: The humor continuum: from text to smart environments (Keynote Paper). In: Proceedings International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), IEEE Xplore, pp. 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ludden, G.D.S., Kudrowitz, B.M., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P.: Surprise and humor in product design. Designing sensory metaphors in multiple modalities. Humor 25(3), 285–309 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ludden, G.D., Schifferstein, H.N., Hekkert, P.: Beyond surprise: a longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products. Int. J. Des. 6(1), 1–23 (2012)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Van Cauwenberge, F.: Humor in Product Design and its Influence on Consumer Behavior. Master’s thesis, Ghent University, Ghent (2015)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yu, Y., Nam, T.-J.: Let’s Giggle!: Design Principles for Humorous Products. DIS 2014, pp. 275–284. Vancouver (2014)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yu, Y., Nam, T.-Y.: Products with a sense of humor: case study of humorous products with Giggle popper. Int. J. Des. 11(1), 79–92 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pabel, A.: Assessing and enhancing humour in the tourism setting. PhD thesis, James Cook University, Cairns (2014)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nijholt, A.: Mischief humor in smart and playable cities, chapter 11. In: Nijholt, A. (ed.) Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground. Gaming Media and Social Effects, pp 235–253. Springer, Singapore (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations