Advertisement

Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation

  • Xindong Peng
  • Xiang Zhang
  • Zhigang LuoEmail author
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The 5G industry is of great concern to countries to formulate a major national strategy for 5G planning, promote industrial upgrading, and accelerate their economic and technological modernization. When considering the 5G industry evaluation, the basic issues involve strong uncertainty. Pythagorean fuzzy sets, depicted by membership degree and non-membership degree, are a more resultful means for capturing uncertainty. In this paper, the comparison issue in Pythagorean fuzzy environment is disposed by proposing novel score function. Next, the \(\ominus \) and \(\oslash \) operations are defined and their properties are proved. Later, the objective weight is calculated by Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation method. Meanwhile, the combined weight is determined by reflecting both subjective weight and the objective weight. Then, the Pythagorean fuzzy decision making algorithm based Combined Compromise Solution is developed. Lastly, the validity of algorithm is expounded by the 5G evaluation issue, along with their sensitivity analysis. The main advantages of proposed algorithm are: (1) have no counterintuitive phenomena; (2) without division or antilogarithm by zero problem; (3) own stronger ability to distinguish alternatives.

Keywords

5G industry evaluation Pythagorean fuzzy sets Score function CoCoSo CRITIC 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very appreciative to the reviewers for their precious comments which enormously ameliorated the quality of this paper. Our work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61462019, 61806213), MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 18YJCZH054), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2018A030307033, 2018A0303130274), Social Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. GD18CFX06) and Special Innovation Projects of Universities in Guangdong Province (No. KTSCX205).

References

  1. Andrews JG, Buzzi S, Choi W, Hanly SV, Lozano A, Soong AC, Zhang JC (2014) What will 5G be? IEEE J Sel Area Commun 32:1065–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20:87–96zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas A, Sarkar B (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision-making with unknown weight information through entropy measure. Int J Intell Syst 34:1108–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonferroni C (1950) Sulle medie multiple di potenze. Boll Mate Ital 5:267–270MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen TY (2018a) A novel PROMETHEE-based outranking approach for multiple criteria decision analysis with Pythagorean fuzzy information. IEEE Access 6:54495–54506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen TY (2018b) An effective correlation-based compromise approach for multiple criteria decision analysis with Pythagorean fuzzy information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:3529–3541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen TY (2019) Multiple criteria decision analysis under complex uncertainty: a Pearson-like correlation-based Pythagorean fuzzy compromise approach. Int J Intell Syst 34:114–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22:763–770zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao H, Lu M, Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Some novel Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Fund Inform 159:385–428MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garg H (2016a) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:886–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garg H (2016b) A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int J Intell Syst 31:1234–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garg H (2017) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 32:597–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garg H (2018a) Generalised Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations and their application to decision making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30:763–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garg H (2018b) Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multiattribute decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 33:1234–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garg H (2019) New logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 34:82–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J (2018) A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:32–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guan N, Liu T, Zhang Y, Tao D, Davis LS (2019) Truncated Cauchy non-negative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 41:246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hara T, Uchiyama M, Takahasi SE (1998) A refinement of various mean inequalities. J Inequal Appl 1998:387–395MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang HH, Liang Y (2019) An integrative analysis system of gene expression usings self-paced learning and SCAD-Net. Expert Syst Appl 135:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jia-hua D, Zhang H, He Y (2019) Possibility Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi BP (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy average aggregation operators based on generalized and group-generalized parameter with application in MCDM problems. Int J Intell Syst 34:895–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan AA, Ashraf S, Abdullah S, Qiyas M, Luo J, Khan SU (2019a) Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in decision support system. Symmetry 11:383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan M, Abdullah S, Ali A (2019b) Multiattribute group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein prioritized aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 34:1001–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang G, Miao D, Fujita H (2019) Three-way group conflict analysis based on Pythagorean fuzzy set theory. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2908123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laurin CM (1729) A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 36:59–96Google Scholar
  26. Li DQ, Zeng WY (2018) Distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 33:348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Wei G, Lu M (2018a) Pythagorean fuzzy hamy mean operators in multiple attribute group decision making and their application to supplier selection. Symmetry 10:505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li L, Zhang R, Wang J, Zhu X, Xing Y (2018b) Pythagorean fuzzy power Muirhead mean operators with their application to multi-attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:2035–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li YY, Wang JQ, Wang TL (2019) A linguistic neutrosophic multi-criteria group decision-making approach with EDAS method. Arab J Sci Eng 44:2737–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang D, Xu Z (2017) The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 60:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang D, Xu Z, Darko AP (2017) Projection model for fusing the information of Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on geometric Bonferroni mean. Int J Intell Syst 32:966–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang D, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Darko AP (2018a) Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operator and its accelerative calculating algorithm with the multithreading. Int J Intell Syst 33:615–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang D, Xu Z, Liu D, Wu Y (2018b) Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at Pythagorean fuzzy information. Inf Sci 435:282–295MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang D, Darko AP, Xu Z (2019a) Pythagorean fuzzy partitioned geometric Bonferroni mean and its application to multi-criteria group decision making with grey relational analysis. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21:115–128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liang D, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Jamaldeen A (2019b) Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry. Appl Soft Comput 78:583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luglio M, Romano SP, Roseti C, Zampognaro F (2019) Service delivery models for converged satellite-terrestrial 5G network deployment: a satellite-assisted CDN use-case. IEEE Netw 33:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma Z, Xu Z (2016) Symmetric Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric/averaging operators and their application in multicriteria decision-making problems. Int J Intell Syst 31:1198–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mozaffari M, Kasgari A, Saad W, Bennis M, Debbah M (2019) Beyond 5G with UAVs: foundations of a 3D wireless cellular network. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 18:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muirhead RF (1902) Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions of n letters. Proc Edinb Math Soc 21:144–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nguyen XT, Nguyen VH, Garg H (2019) Exponential similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to pattern recognition and decision-making process. Complex Intell Syst 5:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nie RX, Tian ZP, Wang JQ, Hu JH (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and partitioned normalized weighted Bonferroni mean operator. Int J Intell Syst 34:297–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ning Z, Wang X, Xia F, Rodrigues JJ (2019) Joint computation offloading, power allocation, and channel assignment for 5G-enabled traffic management systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 15:3058–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Onar SC, Oztaysi B, Kahraman C (2018) Multicriteria evaluation of cloud service providers using Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS. J Mult Valued Log Soft Comput 30:263–283Google Scholar
  44. Ozdemir Y, Gul M (2019) Measuring development levels of NUTS-2 regions in Turkey based on capabilities approach and multi-criteria decision-making. Comput Ind Eng 128:150–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peng X (2019a) Algorithm for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision making based on WDBA with new score function. Fund Inform 165:99–137MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng X (2019b) New multiparametric similarity measure and distance measure for interval neutrosophic set with IoT industry evaluation. IEEE Access 7:28258–28280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peng X, Dai J (2017) Approaches to Pythagorean fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on prospect theory and regret theory with new distance measure and score function. Int J Intell Syst 32:1187–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peng XD, Garg H (2019a) Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Appl Intell.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01445-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng X, Selvachandran G (2019b) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev 52:1873–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng X, Smarandache F (2019c) New multiparametric similarity measure for neutrosophic set with big data industry evaluation. Artif Intell Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09756-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peng X, Smarandache F (2019d) Novel neutrosophic Dombi Bonferroni mean operators with mobile cloud computing industry evaluation. Expert Syst 36:e12411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30:1133–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peng X, Yang Y (2016a) Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral based MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:989–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peng X, Yang Y (2016b) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31:444–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peng X, Yang Y (2016c) Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set. Comput Eng Appl 52:50–54Google Scholar
  56. Peng X, Yuan H (2016) Fundamental properties of Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Fund Inform 147:415–446MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peng X, Yuan H, Yang Y (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 32:991–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pérez-Domínguez L, Rodríguez-Picón LA, Alvarado-Iniesta A, Luviano-Cruz D, Xu Z (2018) MOORA under Pythagorean fuzzy set for multiple criteria decision making. Complexity.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2602376 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rostamzadeh R, Ghorabaee MK, Govindan K, Esmaeili A, Nobar H (2018) Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach. J Clean Prod 175:651–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shakeel M, Abduulah S, Shahzad M, Mahmood T, Siddiqui N (2019) Averaging aggregation operators with Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36:1899–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shen X, Zhang X, Lan L, Liao Q, Luo Z (2019) Another robust NMF: rethinking the hyperbolic tangent function and locality constraint. IEEE Access 7:31089–31102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taleb T, Afolabi I, Bagaa M (2019) Orchestrating 5G network slices to support industrial internet and to shape next-generation smart factories. IEEE Netw 33:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tus A, Adali EA (2019) The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. OPSEARCH 56:528–538zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wan SP, Li SQ, Dong JY (2018) A three-phase method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making and application to haze management. Comput Ind Eng 123:348–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang J, Gao H, Wei G (2019a) The generalized Dice similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34:1158–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang L, Che YL, Long J, Duan L, Wu K (2019b) Multiple access mmwave design for UAV-aided 5G communications. IEEE Wirel Commun 26:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wei GW (2019a) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Fund Inform 166:57–85MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wei G, Lu M (2018a) Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wei G, Lu M (2018b) Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:1043–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wei G, Wei Y (2018c) Similarity measures of pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 33:634–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu SJ, Wei GW (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Int J Knowl Intell Eng Syst 21:189–201Google Scholar
  73. Wu P, Zhou L, Chen H, Tao Z (2019) Additive consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation with a new expansion principle for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:716–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xiao F, Ding W (2019) Divergence measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application in medical diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput 79:254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35:417–433MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28:436–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yalcin N, Unlu U (2018) A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 24:534–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yang W, Pang Y (2018) New pythagorean fuzzy interaction Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:39241–39260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang W, Pang Y (2019) Hesitant interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR method. Int J Intell Syst 34:754–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yang Y, Chin KS, Ding H, Lv HX, Li YL (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni means based on T-norm and its dual T-conorm. Int J Intell Syst 34:1303–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yazdani M, Chatterjee P (2018) Intelligent decision making tools in manufacturing technology selection. Futuristic composites. Springer, Singapore, pp 113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yazdani M, Zarate P, Zavadskas K, Turskis Z (2018) A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Manag Decis.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yu L, Zeng S, Merigó JM, Zhang C (2019) A new distance measure based on the weighted induced method and its application to Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34:1440–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yucesan M, Kahraman G (2019) Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: a model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. Energy Policy 126:343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zeng W, Li D, Yin Q (2018) Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:2236–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhan J, Alcantud JCR (2019) A novel type of soft rough covering and its application to multicriteria group decision making. Artif Intell Rev 52:2381–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:593–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhu J, Li Y (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators and their application in multiple-criteria group decision-making. Information 9:142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhu L, Liang X, Wang L, Wu X (2018) Generalized pythagorean fuzzy point operators and their application in multi-attributes decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:1407–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zolfani SH, Chatterjee P, Yazdani M (2019) A structured framework for sustainable supplier selection using a combined BWM-CoCoSo model. In: International scientific conference in business, management and economics engineering. Vilnius, Lithuania, pp 797–804Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ComputerNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Information Science and EngineeringShaoguan UniversityShaoguanChina

Personalised recommendations